<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Zhang_et_al_2010b</id>
		<title>Zhang et al 2010b - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Zhang_et_al_2010b"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Zhang_et_al_2010b&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T20:22:26Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Zhang_et_al_2010b&amp;diff=202644&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 415376537 to Zhang et al 2010b</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Zhang_et_al_2010b&amp;diff=202644&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-02-02T06:21:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_415376537&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 415376537&quot;&gt;Draft Content 415376537&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Zhang_et_al_2010b&quot; title=&quot;Zhang et al 2010b&quot;&gt;Zhang et al 2010b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 06:21, 2 February 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Zhang_et_al_2010b&amp;diff=202643&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot; == Abstract ==  The risk and reliability based fitness-for-services (FFS) assessment addressed in this paper is a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based FFS study on subsea...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Zhang_et_al_2010b&amp;diff=202643&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-02-02T06:21:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; == Abstract ==  The risk and reliability based fitness-for-services (FFS) assessment addressed in this paper is a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based FFS study on subsea...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The risk and reliability based fitness-for-services (FFS) assessment addressed in this paper is a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based FFS study on subsea oil or gas pipelines. The main purpose of QRA is to determine the target reliabilities for different pipeline segments. And then, a structure reliability analysis (SRA) method is used to calculate the maximum safe operating pressure, which indicates the pipeline retaining pressure capacity. It has been revealed that the target reliability or target safety level should reflect the consequences of failure, inspection and monitoring scheme etc. But, in the traditional FFS assessment (e.g. B31G and DNV RP F101), the identification of pipeline target reliability is merely based on qualitative judgments and experience. In this paper, however, a quantitative risk assessment will be performed based on abundant data from pipeline inspection and monitoring records, pipeline environmental impact assessment (EIA) study report, pipeline corrosion study report, pipeline emergency response scheme and anything else which can affect the pipeline failure consequences. An example of pipeline FFS assessment performed at four levels has revealed that the risk and reliability based FFS results have much better consistency to the reality.Copyright © 2010 by ASME&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Original document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The different versions of the original document can be found in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d2a/26809fd5b2c2c4a7ba0b452c622a9579b740.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d2a/26809fd5b2c2c4a7ba0b452c622a9579b740.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/OMAE/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/OMAE2010-20670/4567210/469_1.pdf http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/OMAE/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/OMAE2010-20670/4567210/469_1.pdf],&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2010-20670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2010-20670]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/OMAE/proceedings/OMAE2010/49101/469/359840 https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/OMAE/proceedings/OMAE2010/49101/469/359840],&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1617452 http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1617452],&lt;br /&gt;
: [https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1617452 https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1617452],&lt;br /&gt;
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2041428807 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2041428807]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>