Scipediacontent at 14:19, 27 March 2019

2019-03-27T14:19:27Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 603530184 to Yudes-Gomez et al 2018a

2019-03-27T12:07:03Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 603530184 to Yudes-Gomez et al 2018a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "Pulsa aquí para ver la versión en Español (ES) ==== Abstract ==== The g..."

2019-03-27T12:07:00Z

Created page with "<span style="color:#FFFFFF; background:#ffffcc"><span id="article_es"></span>Pulsa aquí para ver la versión en Español (ES)</span> ==== Abstract ==== The g..."

Show changes

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 The goal of this cross-cultural study was to analyze and compare the cybervictimization and cyberaggression scores, and the problematic Internet use between Spain, Colombia and Uruguay. Despite cultural similarities between the Spanish and the South American contexts, there are few empirical studies that have comparatively examined this issue. The study sample consisted of 2,653 subjects aged 10-18 years. Data was collected through the cyberbullying questionnaire and the Spanish version of the “Revised generalized and problematic Internet use scale”. Results showed a higher prevalence of minor cyberbullying behavior in Spain between 10-14 years. In the three countries compared, there was a higher prevalence of two types of bystanders: the defender of the victim and the outsider, although in Colombia there were more profiles of assistant to the bully. Regarding the problematic use of the Internet, there were not differences between the three countries. We provide evidence on the relationship between cybervictimization and cyberaggression and problematic use of the Internet. The dimensions of compulsive use and regulation of mood are the best predictors of cyberbullying. We discuss our results in relation to the possible normalization of violence and its lack of recognition as such.
-[[Media:Draft_Content_603530184-66329.pdf|<span style="color:#0645AD; font-weight: bold">Download the PDF version</span>]]
+[[Media:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329.pdf|<span style="color:#0645AD; font-weight: bold">Download the PDF version</span>]]
 ==== 1. Introduction  ====
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en017.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en017.jpg|center|px|]]
 .2. Assessment instruments
@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en018.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en018.jpg|center|px|]]
 Differences in the proportional distribution of severity of cyberbullying are shown in Table 3 by age and country. The percentage of participants with no problems was higher in Colombia. In contrast, Spain showed a higher number of participants with minor problems (especially within the 10-14 age range). No significant differences were observed regarding severe cyberbullying.
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en019.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en019.jpg|center|px|]]
 Differences based on age and sex were observed in severe CBV in Colombia (10-12 year-old, male: 1,3%; female: 11,7%), ?²(2, N=8)=6,67; p<.05), and minor CBV ( 15-16 year old, male: 4,3%; female: 16,2%), ?²(2, N=37)=17,82; p<.001), with a higher percentage for female students. Differences were also observed in Spain in the category of minor CBV, but with a higher percentage for males (13-14 years, male: 25%; female: 7%), ?²(2, N=28)=18,13; p<.001. No gender- or sex-based differences were found in relation to CBA.
@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en020.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en020.jpg|center|px|]]
 Age-based differences were only observed in Colombia, ?²(12, N=1.339)=42,21; p<.001, being the role of assistant of the cyberbully prevalent among 10-12-year-old students as compared to 15-18-year-old students.
@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en021.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en021.jpg|center|px|]]
 All GPIUS2 dimensions were positively and significantly correlated with overall scores for CBV and CBA, although differences –especially between Colombia and Uruguay– were low to moderate (Table 6).
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329-en022.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329-en022.jpg|center|px|]]
 Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the GPIUS2 dimension that best predicted total scores for CBV and CBA. For Colombia, CBV was predicted by compulsive use (ß=.332 [.174-.490]; p<.001) and mood regulation (ß=.263 [.124-.403]; p<.001) [r2=.049]; whereas CBA was best predicted by negative effects (ß=.406 [.282-.530]; p<.001) [r2= .030]. For Uruguay, the best predictors were mood regulation (for CBV: ß= .680 [.382-.977]; p<.001; for CBA: ß=.303 [.060-.546]; p<.015) [r2=.103] and negative effects (for CBV: ß= .566 [.128-1.005]; p=.012) [r2=.124]; for CBA: ß=.716 [.358-1.075]; p<.001). In Spain, compulsive use (ß=.296 [.140-.452]; p<.001), mood regulation (ß=.286 [.167-.404]; p<.001) and negative effects (ß=.271 [.095-.448]; p=.003) [r2=.143] were predictors of CBV. CBA was predicted by compulsive use (ß=.377 [.308-.446]; p<.001) [r2=.100].
@@ Line 212: / Line 212: @@
 El objetivo de este estudio transcultural ha sido analizar y comparar las puntuaciones de cibervictimización y ciberagresión, y el uso problemático de Internet en adolescentes de España, Colombia y Uruguay, ya que pese a las semejanzas culturales existentes entre el contexto latinoamericano y español son escasos los estudios empíricos que los han comparado previamente. La muestra estuvo formada por 2.653 participantes de 10 a 18 años. Se recogieron datos a través del cuestionario de ciberacoso y de la versión en castellano del «Revised generalized and problematic Internet use scale». Los resultados ponen de manifiesto una mayor prevalencia de conductas de ciberacoso leve en España entre los 10-14 años. En los tres países, destacan dos roles de ciberobservador: defensor de la víctima y no comprometido ante la agresión, aunque con más perfiles de apoyo al agresor en Colombia. No se observan diferencias en un uso problemático de Internet entre los tres países. Se proporcionan evidencias sobre la relación de la cibervictimización y ciberagresión con el uso problemático de Internet. Las dimensiones de uso compulsivo y regulación del estado anímico son las que mejor predicen el ciberacoso. Los resultados son discutidos con relación a la posible normalización de la violencia y su falta de reconocimiento como tal.
-[[Media:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov.pdf|<span style="color:#0645AD; font-weight: bold">Descarga aquí la versión PDF</span>]]
+[[Media:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov.pdf|<span style="color:#0645AD; font-weight: bold">Descarga aquí la versión PDF</span>]]
 ==== 1. Introducción  ====
@@ Line 235: / Line 235: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es017.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es017.jpg|center|px|]]
 .2. Instrumentos de evaluación
@@ Line 268: / Line 268: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es018.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es018.jpg|center|px|]]
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es019.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es019.jpg|center|px|]]
 En la Tabla 3 se muestran, según país y edad, las diferencias en la distribución porcentual de cada nivel de gravedad de ciberacoso. Colombia tuvo mayor porcentaje de participantes que no mostraron problemas. En cuanto a problemas leves, España presentó más casos (especialmente entre los 10-14 años). En los casos de mayor gravedad no hubo diferencias significativas entre países.
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es020.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es020.jpg|center|px|]]
 En relación con las variables sexo y edad, en Colombia se apreciaron diferencias en CBV-Grave (en 10-12 años, hombres: 1,3%; mujeres: 11,7%), ?²(2, N=8)=6,67; p<.05), y CBV-Leve (en 15-16 años, hombres: 4,3%; mujeres: 16,2%), ?²(2, N=37)=17,82; p<.001), con mayor porcentaje de mujeres. Estas diferencias también se observaron en España en CBV-Leve pero en este caso hubo un mayor porcentaje de hombres implicados (en 13-14 años, hombres: 25%; mujeres: 7%), ?²(2, N=28)=18,13; p<.001. No existieron diferencias según estas variables en CBA.
@@ Line 293: / Line 293: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es021.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es021.jpg|center|px|]]
 Por otra parte, todas las dimensiones del GPIUS2 correlacionaron positiva y significativamente con las puntuales globales de CBV y CBA, aunque de manera baja-moderada, especialmente en Colombia y Uruguay (Tabla 6).
@@ Line 300: / Line 300: @@
-[[Image:Draft_Content_603530184-66329_ov-es022.jpg|center|px|]]
+[[Image:Yudes-Gomez_et_al_2018a-66329_ov-es022.jpg|center|px|]]
 ====4. Discusión y conclusiones====

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:07, 27 March 2019
(No difference)

Yudes-Gomez et al 2018a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 14:19, 27 March 2019

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 603530184 to Yudes-Gomez et al 2018a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "Pulsa aquí para ver la versión en Español (ES) ==== Abstract ==== The g..."