Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 568469226 to Worth Alexander 2010a

2021-02-02T01:43:44Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 568469226 to Worth Alexander 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == A significant amount of work has transpired over the past several years in generating consensus-based standards that include ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 for deve..."

2021-02-02T01:43:38Z

Created page with " == Abstract == A significant amount of work has transpired over the past several years in generating consensus-based standards that include ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 for deve..."

New page

== Abstract ==

A significant amount of work has transpired over the past several years in generating consensus-based standards that include ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 for developing composite repair systems. The intent in developing these standards has been to provide industry with guidelines for designing composite repair systems to ensure that damaged pipelines and piping systems are safely and properly reinforced. With the numerous composite repair systems currently available to pipeline operators, the importance of evaluating the capabilities of each system cannot be overstated. The fundamental design variables available to manufacturers are stiffness, strength, and thickness of the composite. A properly-designed repair system ensures that strains in the reinforced steel and reinforcing composite material do not reach unacceptable levels. This paper provides a basic overview of the design philosophy embedded into the current design codes, as well as presenting results associated with several specific studies that were conducted to evaluate composite repair performance.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ab92/d26a9717b2aeab75c686dd7cf38c5b76df97.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ab92/d26a9717b2aeab75c686dd7cf38c5b76df97.pdf]

* [http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IPC2010-31527/2702008/767_1.pdf http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IPC2010-31527/2702008/767_1.pdf],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2010-31527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2010-31527]

* [https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC2010/44236/767/363301 https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC2010/44236/767/363301],
: [http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1615326 http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1615326],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1993016528 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1993016528]

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:43, 2 February 2021
(No difference)

Worth Alexander 2010a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 568469226 to Worth Alexander 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == A significant amount of work has transpired over the past several years in generating consensus-based standards that include ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 for deve..."