https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Viaplana_1995aViaplana 1995a - Revision history2026-07-25T04:41:41ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Viaplana_1995a&diff=107246&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 538649249 to Viaplana 1995a2019-03-14T15:48:46Z<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_538649249" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 538649249">Draft Content 538649249</a> to <a href="/public/Viaplana_1995a" title="Viaplana 1995a">Viaplana 1995a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:48, 14 March 2019</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Scipediacontenthttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Viaplana_1995a&diff=107245&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Created page with " == Resum == The traditional notion of linguistic irregularity is unique, without any internal distinction. It covers all the linguistic facts departing from the general patt..."2019-03-14T15:48:43Z<p>Created page with " == Resum == The traditional notion of linguistic irregularity is unique, without any internal distinction. It covers all the linguistic facts departing from the general patt..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
== Resum ==<br />
<br />
The traditional notion of linguistic irregularity is unique, without any internal distinction. It covers all the linguistic facts departing from the general patterns of a particular language. Everything falling within this notion is thus considered irregular in the same way. Under the irregularity label, though, traditional grammars exhibit an amount of facts, some of which do not have much in common, and would be better treated as belonging to different sets or to different subsets. Assuming that `proper' irregularity is that related to transgressions of the rules, different kinds of 'improper' irregularity come to light. The aim of this paper is to show this on a morphological basis.<br />
<br />
== Text complet ==<br />
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_538649249-7378-7237-document.pdf</pdf></div>Scipediacontent