Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 581449005 to Vernaleken et al 2013a

2021-02-03T17:47:29Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 581449005 to Vernaleken et al 2013a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Three different stereoscopic 3D visualisations are compared with the 2D display currently used at air traffic control (ATC) controller working positions. Usin..."

2021-02-03T17:47:26Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Three different stereoscopic 3D visualisations are compared with the 2D display currently used at air traffic control (ATC) controller working positions. Usin..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Three different stereoscopic 3D visualisations are compared with the 2D display currently used at air traffic control (ATC) controller working positions. Using safety critical air traffic scenarios, air traffic controllers (ATCOs), pilots, and two groups of laypersons, one of which with appropriate training, are asked to judge safety critical scenarios showing two converging aircraft. To simulate the cognitive demands ATCOs have to face when required to process both visual information of the traffic situation display and auditory information caused by incoming radio messages at the same time, an auditory task is added. Due to the experimental manipulation of visualisation-, task-, and person-related variables, the results allow for an explanation of the inconsistent results that have been reported in studies evaluating the use of 3D for ATC. Analyses reveal that performance differences between 2D and 3D depend on both task characteristics and the level of expertise. While the judgement certainty of 2D and 3D is virtually equal in all cases of conflict, the observed differences between the modes of visualisation appear to be due to the dimension on which the aircraft miss each other in case of separation. When judgement certainty is ignored, no noteworthy differences appear. Thus, the results depend on the individual response criterion, because it represents the level of uncertainty the operator is willing to accept.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf http://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf]

* [http://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf http://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/safe130191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/safe130191]

* [https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/SAFE13/SAFE13019FU1.pdf],
: [https://trid.trb.org/view/1263887 https://trid.trb.org/view/1263887],
: [https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-the-built-environment/134/25116 https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactions-on-the-built-environment/134/25116],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2036901225 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2036901225]

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:47, 3 February 2021
(No difference)

Vernaleken et al 2013a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 581449005 to Vernaleken et al 2013a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Three different stereoscopic 3D visualisations are compared with the 2D display currently used at air traffic control (ATC) controller working positions. Usin..."