<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=V._Leggieri_2021a</id>
		<title>V. Leggieri 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=V._Leggieri_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=V._Leggieri_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T20:24:00Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=V._Leggieri_2021a&amp;diff=232691&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 284578256 to V. Leggieri 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=V._Leggieri_2021a&amp;diff=232691&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T11:53:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_284578256&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 284578256&quot;&gt;Draft Content 284578256&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/V._Leggieri_2021a&quot; title=&quot;V. Leggieri 2021a&quot;&gt;V. Leggieri 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:53, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=V._Leggieri_2021a&amp;diff=232690&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The  study  of  the  seismic  vulnerability  of  historical  centres,  especially  in  the  Mediterranean zone, is one of the main issues in ongoing scientific...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=V._Leggieri_2021a&amp;diff=232690&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T11:53:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The  study  of  the  seismic  vulnerability  of  historical  centres,  especially  in  the  Mediterranean zone, is one of the main issues in ongoing scientific...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  study  of  the  seismic  vulnerability  of  historical  centres,  especially  in  the &lt;br /&gt;
Mediterranean zone, is one of the main issues in ongoing scientific research. This is due, on &lt;br /&gt;
the one hand, to the continuous evolution of the seismic demand and, on the other hand, to the &lt;br /&gt;
high  vulnerability  of  the  masonry  existing  building  stock.  &lt;br /&gt;
The seismic events of the last few years highlighted the necessity to perform a large-scale &lt;br /&gt;
survey of the huge amount of masonry buildings in historical centres, in order to provide &lt;br /&gt;
prioritization  scales  for  planning  mitigation  strategies.  With  this  regard,  the  scientific &lt;br /&gt;
literature provides  several  methodologies  that  allow  a  rapid  assessment  based  on  pre-&lt;br /&gt;
defined  survey forms. The data obtained from the surveys are usually used as the input for &lt;br /&gt;
algorithms  aimed  at  estimating  the  vulnerability  level  of  the  building  investigated.   &lt;br /&gt;
The  aim  of  the  present  work  is  to  propose  a  general  framework  for  analysing seismic &lt;br /&gt;
vulnerability of masonry historical centres and deriving fragility curves basing on multiple data &lt;br /&gt;
sources.  In  particular,  using  data  collected  through  existing  territorial  databases, &lt;br /&gt;
supplemented  by  a  set  of  vulnerability  forms  available  for  the  city  centre  of  the &lt;br /&gt;
Municipality  of  Foggia, Southern Italy, some vulnerability classes are defined. Based on the &lt;br /&gt;
mechanical  and  geometrical  features  identified  for  each  class,  several  ideal  and &lt;br /&gt;
representative buildings are generated, and their seismic behaviour is investigated through &lt;br /&gt;
the  variation  of  significant  parameters.  &lt;br /&gt;
At the end, the capacity of the buildings is evaluated by performing simplified nonlinear &lt;br /&gt;
analyses and, subsequently, by estimating the damage level of the sample through the definition &lt;br /&gt;
of regional fragility curves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_284578256p1201.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1]  Calvi G.M., Pinho R., Magenes G., Bommer J.J., Restrepo-Veléz L.F., Crowley H., (2006)  The  development  of  seismic  vulnerability  assessment  methodologies  for  variable   geographical scales over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43(3),  75-104.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]  G. Uva, P. L. Ciampoli, V. Leggieri, A. Nettis, and S. Ruggieri, A mechanical approach  for  estimating  regional  fragility  curves  of  existing  RC  buildings  stock  in  Puglia,  in  COMPDYN 2019 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in  Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (2019).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]  Uva G, Sangiorgio V., Ciampoli P.L., Leggieri V, Ruggieri S., A novel rapid survey form  for the vulnerability assessment of existing building stock based on the “Index Building”  approach, Conference Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and  Cybernetics (2019), Bari 6-9 Oct. DOI:10.1109/SMC.2019.8914063  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]  Perrone D, et al, Rapid visual screening for seismic evaluation of RC hospital buildings,  Structures (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.03.002   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]  Porco F., Ruggieri S., Uva G., (2018) Seismic assessment of irregular existing building:  appraisal of the influence of compressive strength variation by means of nonlinear  conventional and multimodal static analysis, Ingegneria Sismica, 35(3), pp. 64-86  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]  Lagomarsino S., Podesta S. (2004). Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage  assessment and emergency planning. Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), pp. 377–394.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]  Uva G, Sangiorgio V., Ruggieri S., Fatiguso F., Structural vulnerability assessment of masonry churches supported by user-reported data and modern Internet of Things (IoT),  Measurement (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.014;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]  De  Matteis,  G.,  Brando,  G.  &amp;amp;amp;  Corlito,  V.  Predictive  model  for  seismic  vulnerability  assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 17,  4909–4936 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]  G. Zuccaro, M. Dolce, D. De Gregorio, E. Speranza, and C. Moroni, La Scheda Cartis Per  La  Caratterizzazione  Tipologico-Strutturale  Dei  Comparti  Urbani  Costituiti  Da  Edifici  Ordinari.  Valutazione  dell’esposizione  in  analisi  di  rischio  sismico  34°  Convegno  Nazionale GNGTS, Trieste, 17-19 novembre 2015.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] A. Bernardini (A cura di), La vulnerabilità degli edifici: valutazione a scala nazionale della  vulnerabilità  sismica  degli  edifici  ordinari,  CNR-Gruppo  Nazionale  per  la  Difesa  dai  Terremoti - Roma, 2000, 175 pp. + CD-ROM allegato  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] G.  Uva,  C.A.  Sanjust,  S.  Casolo,  M.  Mezzina,  ANTAEUS  project  for  the  regional  vulnerability assessment of the current building stock in historical centers International  Journal  of  Architectural  Heritage,  10(1),  pp.  20-43,  2016.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2014.935983  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] FEMA  (2001)  HAZUS99  Technical  Manual.  Service  Release  2.  Federal  Emergency  Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Cosenza E., Manfredi G., Polese M., Verderame G.M., (2005) A multi-level approach to  the capacity assessment of existing RC buildings. J. of Earthq. Eng., 9(1), 1-22.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Borzi B., Pinho, R. Crowley H. (2008). Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis  for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 30(3), 804-820.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Del Vecchio C., Gentile R., Di Ludovico M., Uva G., Pampanin S. (2018). Implementation  and  Validation  of  the  Simple  Lateral  Mechanism  Analysis  (SLaMA)  for  the  Seismic   Performance  Assessment  of  a  Damaged  Case  Study  Building,  Journal  of  Earthquake  Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1483278  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] Gentile R., del Vecchio C., Pampanin S., Raffaele D., Uva G. (2019). Refinement and  Validation  of  the  Simple  Lateral  Mechanism  Analysis  (SLaMA):  Procedure  for  RC  Frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1560377  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] Ruggieri,  S.,  Porco,  F.  &amp;amp;amp;  Uva,  G.  A  practical  approach  for  estimating  the  floor  deformability in existing RC buildings: evaluation of the effects in the structural response  and seismic fragility. Bull. Earthq. Eng. (2019).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[18] Lagomarsino  S.  and  Giovinazzi  S.,  Macroseismic  and  mechanical  models  for  the  vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4, 415–443,  (2006).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[19] Borzi B., Crowley H., Pinho R. Simplified Pushover-Based Earthquake Loss Assessment  (SP-BELA)  Method  for  Masonry  Buildings,  International  Journal  of  Architectural  Heritage, (2008) 2:4, 353-376, DOI: 10.1080/15583050701828178A  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[20] Y. Liu, Z. Li, B. Wei, X. Li and B. Fu, Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale  using data mining and GIScience technology: application to Urumqi (China), Geomatics,  Nat. Hazards Risk 10, 958–985 (2019).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[21] L.  Matassoni,  S.  Giovinazzi,  M.  Pollino,  A.  Fiaschi,  L.  La  Porta  and  V.  Rosato,  A Geospatial Decision Support Tool for Seismic Risk Management: Florence (Italy) Case  Study, Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2013, 7974, 278–293 (2013).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[22] G.  Uva,  M.  Dassisti,  F.  Iannone,  G.  Florio,  F.  Maddalena,  M.  Ruta,  A.  Grieco,  I. Giannoccaro, V. Albino, M. Lezoche, A. Aubry, A. Giovannini, A. Buscicchio, Y. Eslami,  V.  Leggieri,  Modelling  Framework  for  Sustainable  Co-management  of  Multi-purpose  Exhibition Systems: The ‘Fiera del Levante’ Case, Procedia Engineering 180, 812-821,  (2017).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[23] Uva G., Leggieri V., Morrone M., USE of data derived by different sources for the seismic  vulnerability assessment of current building stock in GIS environment: an application to  the  municipality  of  Bisceglie,  Italy.  3rd  International  Conference  on  International  Conference on Recent Advances in Nonlinear Design, Resilience and Rehabilitation of  Structures, CoRASS 2019 H. Barros, C. Ferreira, José M. Adam and Norb Delatte (Eds)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[24] Uva G., Leggieri V., Mastrodonato G., Proposal of a procedure for gathering data for the  structural and energy classification of residential building stock: a case study in Puglia. 3rd  International Conference on International Conference on Recent Advances in Nonlinear  Design, Resilience and Rehabilitation of Structures, CoRASS 2019 H. Barros, C. Ferreira,  José M. Adam and Norb Delatte (Eds)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[25] Pagnini LC, Vicente R, Lagomarsino S, Varum H. A mechanical model for the seismic  vulnerability assessment of old masonry buildings. Earthq Struct 2011;2(1)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[26] Formisano A., Florio G., Landolfo R., Mazzolani F. Numerical calibration of an easy  method for seismic behaviour assessment on large scale of masonry building aggregates.  Advances in Engineering Software 80 (2015) 116–138  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[27] Formisano  A.  Theoretical  and  Numerical  Seismic  Analysis  of  Masonry  Building  Aggregates: Case Studies in San Pio Delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy). Journal of Earthquake  Engineering, 00:1–19, 2016  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[28] Ramos LF, Lourenço PB. Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic  areas: a case study in Lisbon. Eng Struct 2004;26(9):1295–310.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[29] Senaldi  I,  Magenes  G,  Penna  A.  Numerical  investigations  on  the seismic  response  of masonry building aggregates. Adv Mater Res 2010;133– 134:715–20.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[30] Casolo S., Sanjust C. A., Uva G., Diana V., Seismic modelling and analysis of masonry  building in aggregate: a case study. Compdyn 2017 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference  on  Computational  Methods  in  Structural  Dynamics  and  Earthquake  Engineering  M.  Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis (eds.) Rhodes Island, Greece, 15–17 June 2017  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[31] Fagundes C., Bento R., Cattari S., On the seismic response of buildings in aggregate:  Analysis of a typical masonry building from Azores, Structures (2016).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[32] Ferrito T, Milosevic J, Bento R, Seismic vulnerability assessment of a mixed masonry–RC building aggregate by linear and nonlinear analyses. Bull Earthquake Eng. (2016).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[33] Aiello, M.A., Ciampoli, P.L., Fiore, A., Perrone, D., Uva, G. (2017a) Influence of infilled  frames on seismic vulnerability assessment of recurrent building typologies, Ingegneria  Sismica, 34(4), pp. 58-80  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[34] Tomazevic, M., “The computer program POR”, Report ZRMK, 1978 (in Slovenian)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[35] https://www.newsoft-eng.it/software/por-2000/  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[36] Circolare  21  gennaio  2019,  n.7  C.S.LL.PP.  Istruzioni  per  l’applicazione  dell’Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al DM 17/01/2018.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>