Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 236405179 to Turner et al 2018a

2020-10-14T14:32:12Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 236405179 to Turner et al 2018a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The work reported here is a result of the EPSRC Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Hub research programme (Grant ref. EP/J016454/1). A core theme of the UK Gover..."

2020-10-14T14:32:10Z

Created page with " == Abstract == The work reported here is a result of the EPSRC Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Hub research programme (Grant ref. EP/J016454/1). A core theme of the UK Gover..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The work reported here is a result of the EPSRC Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Hub research programme (Grant ref. EP/J016454/1). A core theme of the UK Government's new Industrial Strategy is exploiting opportunities for domestic supply chain development. This extends to a special Automotive Sector Deal that focuses on the shift to low emissions vehicles (LEVs). Here attention is on electric vehicle and battery production and innovation. In this paper, we argue that a more straightforward gain in terms of framing policy around potential economic benefits may be made through supply chain activity to support refuelling of battery/hydrogen vehicles. We set this in the context of LEV refuelling supply chains potentially replicating the strength of domestic upstream linkages observed in the UK electricity and/or gas industries. We use input-output multiplier analysis to deconstruct and assess the structure of these supply chains relative to that of more import-intensive petrol and diesel supply. A crucial multiplier result is that for every £1million of spending on electricity (or gas), 8 full-time equivalent jobs are supported throughout the UK. This compares to less than 3 in the case of petrol/diesel supply. Moreover, the importance of service industries becomes apparent, with 67% of indirect and induced supply chain employment to support electricity generation being located in services industries. The comparable figure for GDP is 42%. Publisher PDF Peer reviewed

Document type: Book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_236405179-beopen1034-7963-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.011] under the license cc-by

* [https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/63949/8/Turner_etal_EP_2018_Framing_policy_on_low_emissions_vehicles_in_terms_of_economic_gains.pdf https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/63949/8/Turner_etal_EP_2018_Framing_policy_on_low_emissions_vehicles_in_terms_of_economic_gains.pdf] under the license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

* [https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/68480/1/Alabi_etal_2018_Framing_policy_on_low_emissions_vehicles_in_terms_of_economic_gains.pdf https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/68480/1/Alabi_etal_2018_Framing_policy_on_low_emissions_vehicles_in_terms_of_economic_gains.pdf]

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:32, 14 October 2020
(No difference)

Turner et al 2018a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 236405179 to Turner et al 2018a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The work reported here is a result of the EPSRC Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Research Hub research programme (Grant ref. EP/J016454/1). A core theme of the UK Gover..."