Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 730467172 to Turkenburg et al 2010a

2021-02-16T11:30:34Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 730467172 to Turkenburg et al 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs..."

2021-02-16T11:30:31Z

Created page with " == Abstract == systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs..."

New page

== Abstract ==

systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) for CO2 pipelines is presented. Sources of uncertainties that have been assessed are: failure rates, pipeline pressure, temperature, section length, diameter, orifice size, type and direction of release, meteorological conditions, jet diameter, vapour mass fraction in the release and the dose-effect relationship for CO2. A sensitivity analysis with these parameters is performed using release, dispersion and impact models. The results show that the knowledge gaps and uncertainties have a large effect on the accuracy of the assessed risks of CO2 pipelines. In this study it is found that the individual risk contour can vary between 0 and 204m from the pipeline depending on assumptions made. In existing studies this range is found to be between <1m and 7.2km. Mitigating the relevant risks is part of current practice, making them controllable. It is concluded that QRA for CO2 pipelines can be improved by validation of release and dispersion models for high-pressure CO2 releases, definition and adoption of a universal dose-effect relationship and development of a good practice guide for QRAs for CO2 pipelines. © 2009 Elsevier B.V.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068]

* [https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/203095 https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/203095]

* [https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304389409018664?httpAccept=text/xml https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304389409018664?httpAccept=text/xml],
: [https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304389409018664?httpAccept=text/plain https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0304389409018664?httpAccept=text/plain],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068] under the license https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

* [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389409018664 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389409018664],
: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022693 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20022693],
: [http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/203095 http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/203095],
: [https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:9d14f298-5eda-454c-938c-36bf3296b027 https://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:9d14f298-5eda-454c-938c-36bf3296b027],
: [https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Atudelft.nl%3Auuid%3A9d14f298-5eda-454c-938c-36bf3296b027 https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Atudelft.nl%3Auuid%3A9d14f298-5eda-454c-938c-36bf3296b027],
: [https://core.ac.uk/display/39740034 https://core.ac.uk/display/39740034],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2119643760 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2119643760]

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:30, 16 February 2021
(No difference)

Turkenburg et al 2010a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 730467172 to Turkenburg et al 2010a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == systematic assessment, based on an extensive literature review, of the impact of gaps and uncertainties on the results of quantitative risk assessments (QRAs..."