https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Tran_Piat_2024a Tran Piat 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-08T04:38:34Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tran_Piat_2024a&diff=304989&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 336733889 to Tran Piat 2024a 2024-06-28T09:52:34Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_336733889" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 336733889">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 336733889</a> to <a href="/public/Tran_Piat_2024a" title="Tran Piat 2024a">Tran Piat 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:52, 28 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tran_Piat_2024a&diff=304988&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:52, 28 June 2024 2024-06-28T09:52:30Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:52, 28 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Microstructures with minimal surfaces can be often found in natural porous architectures, where the surface tension minimizes the area. The triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) [1] are an example of such microstructures. Compared with other porous structures, TPMS have three significant features: firstly, their geometries can be completely expressed via analytical functions; secondly, TPMS are periodic in three independent directions and thirdly, the mean curvature of TPMS is zero [2]. Transforming the TPMS-based unit cell into a lattice structure has particular usage in aerospace, nuclear energy, and biomedical applications where light weight, high stiffness, and temperature resistance are of critical importance. In the presented studies, the failure behavior of four typical TPMS structures (Primitive, Gyroid, Neovius, and IWP) under compression was studied using finite element analysis. Numerical modeling of the damage propagation and strength prediction was performed by removing the finite elements in which the appropriate damage criterion is reached. Utilizing the equations of the generated TPMS structures, the wall thickness of unit cell was considered the main parameter that defined the ceramics volume fraction and should be taken into consideration. Therefore, various unit cell models for different wall thicknesses were generated and used to investigate the impact of the cell geometry on the damage initiation, propagation, and overall compression strength. The results of compression strength and damage development were compared with those of other TPMS structures for the same wall thickness and volume fraction. Finally, the grade TPMS porous structure was provided to verify the effect of wall thickness variation on damage evolution on the macroscale.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Microstructures with minimal surfaces can be often found in natural porous architectures, where the surface tension minimizes the area. The triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) [1] are an example of such microstructures. Compared with other porous structures, TPMS have three significant features: firstly, their geometries can be completely expressed via analytical functions; secondly, TPMS are periodic in three independent directions and thirdly, the mean curvature of TPMS is zero [2]. Transforming the TPMS-based unit cell into a lattice structure has particular usage in aerospace, nuclear energy, and biomedical applications where light weight, high stiffness, and temperature resistance are of critical importance. In the presented studies, the failure behavior of four typical TPMS structures (Primitive, Gyroid, Neovius, and IWP) under compression was studied using finite element analysis. Numerical modeling of the damage propagation and strength prediction was performed by removing the finite elements in which the appropriate damage criterion is reached. Utilizing the equations of the generated TPMS structures, the wall thickness of unit cell was considered the main parameter that defined the ceramics volume fraction and should be taken into consideration. Therefore, various unit cell models for different wall thicknesses were generated and used to investigate the impact of the cell geometry on the damage initiation, propagation, and overall compression strength. The results of compression strength and damage development were compared with those of other TPMS structures for the same wall thickness and volume fraction. Finally, the grade TPMS porous structure was provided to verify the effect of wall thickness variation on damage evolution on the macroscale.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_3367338898.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:304986:newid:304988 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tran_Piat_2024a&diff=304986&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:52, 28 June 2024 2024-06-28T09:52:28Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:52, 28 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Microstructures with minimal surfaces can be often found in natural porous architectures, where the surface tension minimizes the area. The triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS) [1] are an example of such microstructures. Compared with other porous structures, TPMS have three significant features: firstly, their geometries can be completely expressed via analytical functions; secondly, TPMS are periodic in three independent directions and thirdly, the mean curvature of TPMS is zero [2]. Transforming the TPMS-based unit cell into a lattice structure has particular usage in aerospace, nuclear energy, and biomedical applications where light weight, high stiffness, and temperature resistance are of critical importance. In the presented studies, the failure behavior of four typical TPMS structures (Primitive, Gyroid, Neovius, and IWP) under compression was studied using finite element analysis. Numerical modeling of the damage propagation and strength prediction was performed by removing the finite elements in which the appropriate damage criterion is reached. Utilizing the equations of the generated TPMS structures, the wall thickness of unit cell was considered the main parameter that defined the ceramics volume fraction and should be taken into consideration. Therefore, various unit cell models for different wall thicknesses were generated and used to investigate the impact of the cell geometry on the damage initiation, propagation, and overall compression strength. The results of compression strength and damage development were compared with those of other TPMS structures for the same wall thickness and volume fraction. Finally, the grade TPMS porous structure was provided to verify the effect of wall thickness variation on damage evolution on the macroscale.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:304985:newid:304986 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tran_Piat_2024a&diff=304985&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-28T09:52:26Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez