Toprak et al 2015a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 22:31, 28 January 2021

2021-01-28T22:31:41Z

Scipediacontent at 13:20, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T13:20:03Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 398508149 to Toprak et al 2015a

2020-10-14T12:46:15Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 398508149 to Toprak et al 2015a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performan..."

2020-10-14T12:46:11Z

Created page with " == Abstract == This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performan..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. © The Author(s) 2015.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_398508149-beopen623-9051-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230]

* [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/15106 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/15106]

* [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/22649 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/22649]

* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf] under the license cc-by-nc

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 28 January 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

−	This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. Â© The Author(s) 2015.	+	This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. © The Author(s) 2015.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 == Abstract ==
-This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. © The Author(s) 2015.
+This paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. Â© The Author(s) 2015.
-−
-Document type: Part of book or chapter of book
-−
-== Full document ==
-<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_398508149-beopen623-9051-document.pdf</pdf>
@@ Line 14: / Line 9: @@
 The different versions of the original document can be found in:
-* [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230]
+* [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/10230] under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc
 * [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/15106 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/15106]
@@ Line 20: / Line 15: @@
 * [http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/22649 http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/22649]
-* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf] under the license cc-by-nc
+* [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16964-4_10.pdf]

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:46, 14 October 2020
(No difference)