<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Tonna_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Tonna et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Tonna_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tonna_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T17:20:39Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tonna_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232815&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 483024217 to Tonna et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tonna_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232815&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:18:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_483024217&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 483024217&quot;&gt;Draft Content 483024217&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Tonna_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Tonna et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Tonna et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:18, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tonna_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232814&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The need to define earthquake prevention and intervention strategies, in order to  limit dramatic consequences for the society, has acquired a high priority in...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Tonna_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232814&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:18:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The need to define earthquake prevention and intervention strategies, in order to  limit dramatic consequences for the society, has acquired a high priority in...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The need to define earthquake prevention and intervention strategies, in order to &lt;br /&gt;
limit dramatic consequences for the society, has acquired a high priority in countries where, &lt;br /&gt;
like in Italy, a large number of historic masonry buildings (listed or not) are located in areas &lt;br /&gt;
with  medium  to  high  seismic  hazard.  From  the  point  of  view  of  the  level  of  safety  to  be &lt;br /&gt;
reached  through  interventions,  the  concept  of  improvement,  as  opposed  to  that  of  full &lt;br /&gt;
strengthening, is nowadays widely accepted in the case of monumental heritage; what is still &lt;br /&gt;
lacking, in many cases, is a procedure for the vulnerability analysis, as a synthetic evaluation &lt;br /&gt;
tool  for  the  definition  of  intervention  priorities.  In  a  modern  perspective,  where  territorial &lt;br /&gt;
planning  is  conceived  as  a  safety  project  for  the  territory,  the  seismic  vulnerability  analysis &lt;br /&gt;
should not be confined to specific technical documents, but should rather be considered at a &lt;br /&gt;
general  level;  in  this  way  only,  indeed,  the  issue  of  seismic  risk  could  acquire  widespread &lt;br /&gt;
knowledge and awareness in the population, also pushing urban planning in the direction of &lt;br /&gt;
general programs for the increase of seismic safety. In the above perspective, revised criteria &lt;br /&gt;
have to be developed for a global vulnerability assessment, to be introduced at a general level &lt;br /&gt;
in territorial planning. Considering that seismic vulnerability analyses are strictly dependent &lt;br /&gt;
on specific building typologies, attention has been focused, in the present study, on to the case &lt;br /&gt;
of  structural  aggregates  in  historical  centers,  thus  following  the  needs  of  the  Italian  Civil &lt;br /&gt;
Protection Agency in relation to seismic prevention activities in historical towns. The &lt;br /&gt;
research, which is still in progress, takes advantage from the application to a few study cases, &lt;br /&gt;
suitable for the experimental testing of procedures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_483024217p656.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Benedetti, D., Petrini, V., Sulla vulnerabilità sismica di edifici in muratura: Proposta su  un metodo di valutazione. L’industria delle Costr. (1984) 149, 66–74.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Giuffrè, A. Sicurezza e conservazione dei centri storici: il caso Ortigia. Laterza, (1993).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Aguado,  J.L.P.,  Ferreira,  T.M.,  Lourenço,  P.B.,  The  Use  of  a  Large-Scale  Seismic  Vulnerability  Assessment  Approach  for  Masonry  FaçadeWalls  as  an  Effective  Tool  for  Evaluating, Managing and Mitigating Seismic Risk in Historical Centers.  Int. J. Archit.  Herit. (2018) 12, 1259–1275.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Petrini , V., Sede indagine: regione Lombardia, provincia Brescia (1995).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Carocci C. et al, Il caso di Faenza (RA)- Identificazione preliminare delle caratteristiche  degli aggregati del centro storico e delle vulnerabilità osservate, (2011).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Carocci C. et al, Piano di Ricostruzione  del centro storico di Fossa (AQ) (2012).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Rondelet, J. Traité théorique et pratique de l’art de bâtir. Parigi, Francia, 1802-1817, in :  Tocci, C., Masiani, R., Lagomarsino, S., Cocina, S., Carocci, C. F., Sicurezza e  conservazione degli edifici storici monumentali, pag. 78, ed.Gangemi Editore (2016).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Vicente,  R., Parodi , S., Lagomarsino, S., Varum, H.,  Mendes Silva, J. A. R., Seismic  vulnerability  and  risk  assessment:  case  study  of  the  historic  city  centre  of  Coimbra,  Portugal, Bull Earthquake Eng - © Springer Science+Business Media (2011).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] Ferreira,  T.M.,  Maio,  R.,  Vicente,  R.,  Analysis  of  the  impact  of  large  scale  seismic retrofitting  strategies  through  the application  of  a  vulnerability-based approach  on  traditional masonry buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. (2017) 16, 329–348.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] Ferreira  T.M.,  Mendes  N.,  Silva  R.,  Multiscale  Seismic  Vulnerability  Assessment  and Retrofit of Existing Masonry Buildings, MDPI Journal (2019).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] Formisano, A., Florio, G., R. Landolfo, Mazzolani, F. M., Un metodo per la valutazione  su larga scala della vulnerabilità sismica degli aggregati storici, ANIDIS. Bari, (2011).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Bernardini,  A.,  Giovinazzi  S.,  Lagomarsino  S.,  Parodi  S.  Vulnerabilità  e  previsione  di danno a scala territoriale secondo una metodologia macrosismica coerente con la scala  EMS-98. Convegno A.N.I.D.I.S. Pisa, Italia, (2007).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] Dolce,  M.,  Masi,  A.,  Marino,  M.,  Vona,  M.,  Earthquake  damage  scenarios  of  the  building  stock  of  Potenza  (Southern  Italy)  including  site  effects.  Bull.  Earthq.  Eng.  (2003) 1, 115–140.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Braga,  F.,  Dolce,  M.,  Liberatore,  D.  A  statistical  study  on  damaged  buildings  and  an ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on  Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece, 20–25 September (1982) pp. 431–450.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] ATC-13.  Earthquake  Damage  Estimation  Data  for  California;  Report  ATC-13;  Applied Technology Council: Redwood City, CA, USA, (1985).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[16] Faccioli,  E.,  Pessina,  V.,  Calvi  G.  M.  and  Borzi,  B.,  A  study  on  damage  scenarios  for residential buildings in Catania city, Article in Journal of Seismology (1999) 3, 327–343.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[17] L. Berto, P. Faccio, A. Saetta, D. Talledo, I. Zamboni, 2017, Valutazione di vulnerabilità  sismica  di  edifici  complessi/in  aggregato:  metodi  di  primo  livello,  in :  Atti  del  XVII  Convegno  Nazionale  ANIDIS, L’ingegneria  sismica  in  Italia (Pistoia,  17-21  settembre  2017), Pisa University press, Pisa.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[18] PCM-DPC.  Manuale  compilazione  scheda  di  1°  livello  di  rilevamento  danno,  pronto  intervento e agibilità per edifici ordinari nell'emergenza post-sismica (AeDES) (2014).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>