Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 482187133 to Smith Turnquist 2016a

2021-02-03T18:52:05Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 482187133 to Smith Turnquist 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The application of in-line inspection (ILI) to assess pipelines for various anomalies is standard practice in the pipeline industry. When ILI data identifies..."

2021-02-03T18:52:01Z

Created page with " == Abstract == The application of in-line inspection (ILI) to assess pipelines for various anomalies is standard practice in the pipeline industry. When ILI data identifies..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The application of in-line inspection (ILI) to assess pipelines for various anomalies is standard practice in the pipeline industry. When ILI data identifies the presence of anomalies such as denting or ovalization, current convention is to perform either a depth-based or strain-based assessment to assess the severity. Although a strain-based methodology is generally accepted in the pipeline industry, this approach does not address all of the primary damage mechanisms associated with pipeline dents. Assessment based upon either depth or strain alone may not only provide non-conservative results but also fail to properly rank dents in order of their true severity. A life-cycle assessment approach that considers the damage caused by the dent formation, the stress intensification effect of the dent profile, and the severity of future pressure cycling provides an improved understanding of the probability of failure, allowing for more informed integrity management decision making. Strain-based assessment of dents in pipelines is typically performed by calculating the local curvatures in the dent geometry as measured by ILI. Local strains are then calculated based on these local curvatures. However, this approach does not address that once a dent has been formed, continued pressure cycling at that location is what will ultimately cause a failure. The current strain-based methodology does not account for the severity of the pressure cycling at the dent. A new and innovative methodology has been developed which takes a life-cycle approach to the assessment of pipeline dents. This approach estimates the remaining life of a dent based on fatigue damage accumulation. Finite element analysis (FEA) is used to calculate various stress concentration factors (SCFs) based on the geometry of the dent. These SCFs are used to calculate an equivalent alternating stress for a unit pressure cycle event. Past representative pressure cycling data is gathered using a rainflow counting approach. The amount of damage accumulated during each pressure cycle is calculated using stress or strain based (S-N) fatigue curves; this allows for a damage rate to be calculated based on past operational history. A remaining life can be estimated based on this damage rate and an estimation of the initial fatigue damage accumulated during formation of the dent. This estimation is made based on previous elastic-plastic FEA of various scenarios which simulate the formation and shakedown of a pipeline dent. Case studies which explore the use of different assessment methods to analyze dents will be presented. A comparison of different assessment methodologies will illustrate the improved understanding of the probability of failure of dents based upon the life-cycle assessment.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1e35/fcfee03afc28ee6828b4c9d7ce87fd3232ec.pdf http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1e35/fcfee03afc28ee6828b4c9d7ce87fd3232ec.pdf]

* [http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IPC2016-64460/2510224/v001t03a024-ipc2016-64460.pdf http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IPC2016-64460/2510224/v001t03a024-ipc2016-64460.pdf],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2016-64460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2016-64460]

* [https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC2016/50251/V001T03A024/266672 https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/proceedings/IPC2016/50251/V001T03A024/266672],
: [https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2583735 https://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2583735],
: [http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2583735 http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2583735],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2550592442 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2550592442]

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:52, 3 February 2021
(No difference)

Smith Turnquist 2016a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 482187133 to Smith Turnquist 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The application of in-line inspection (ILI) to assess pipelines for various anomalies is standard practice in the pipeline industry. When ILI data identifies..."