https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Serrat_et_al_2023aSerrat et al 2023a - Revision history2026-04-16T17:21:45ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Serrat_et_al_2023a&diff=284477&oldid=prevJSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 764858138 to Serrat et al 2023a2023-10-03T10:00:59Z<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_764858138" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 764858138">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 764858138</a> to <a href="/public/Serrat_et_al_2023a" title="Serrat et al 2023a">Serrat et al 2023a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:00, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Serrat_et_al_2023a&diff=284420&oldid=prevJSanchez at 09:55, 3 October 20232023-10-03T09:55:53Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:55, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In the long-term performance analysis of the built environment, classification systems are seen as a key consideration. When classifying residential building objects, characteristics such as accuracy, exhaustivity, and consistency are required. It is noticeable that while organizations around the world are working to develop an internationally agreed standard classifier, the use of national classification systems remains widespread. Therefore, this paper focuses on reviewing the most popular classification systems such as CoClass, Uniclass 2015 and OmniClass®, among others, and discusses their strengths and weaknesses, in order to be useful both to the research and technical communities. Based on this, two main contributions are derived. On the one hand, the paper points out that there is no international consensus to use a common classification system. On the other hand, some recommendations are given and illustrated to meet the challenges of classifying existing buildings, in particular under a functional assessment approach.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In the long-term performance analysis of the built environment, classification systems are seen as a key consideration. When classifying residential building objects, characteristics such as accuracy, exhaustivity, and consistency are required. It is noticeable that while organizations around the world are working to develop an internationally agreed standard classifier, the use of national classification systems remains widespread. Therefore, this paper focuses on reviewing the most popular classification systems such as CoClass, Uniclass 2015 and OmniClass®, among others, and discusses their strengths and weaknesses, in order to be useful both to the research and technical communities. Based on this, two main contributions are derived. On the one hand, the paper points out that there is no international consensus to use a common classification system. On the other hand, some recommendations are given and illustrated to meet the challenges of classifying existing buildings, in particular under a functional assessment approach.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_76485813861.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284418:newid:284420 -->
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Serrat_et_al_2023a&diff=284418&oldid=prevJSanchez at 09:55, 3 October 20232023-10-03T09:55:52Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:55, 3 October 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In the long-term performance analysis of the built environment, classification systems are seen as a key consideration. When classifying residential building objects, characteristics such as accuracy, exhaustivity, and consistency are required. It is noticeable that while organizations around the world are working to develop an internationally agreed standard classifier, the use of national classification systems remains widespread. Therefore, this paper focuses on reviewing the most popular classification systems such as CoClass, Uniclass 2015 and OmniClass®, among others, and discusses their strengths and weaknesses, in order to be useful both to the research and technical communities. Based on this, two main contributions are derived. On the one hand, the paper points out that there is no international consensus to use a common classification system. On the other hand, some recommendations are given and illustrated to meet the challenges of classifying existing buildings, in particular under a functional assessment approach.</ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284417:newid:284418 -->
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Serrat_et_al_2023a&diff=284417&oldid=prevJSanchez: Created blank page2023-10-03T09:55:50Z<p>Created blank page</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>JSanchez