<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Sangiorgio et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T17:20:34Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232847&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 246058912 to Sangiorgio et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232847&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:20:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_246058912&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 246058912&quot;&gt;Draft Content 246058912&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Sangiorgio et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Sangiorgio et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:20, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232846&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The heritage building stock represents a significant element at risk from earthquakes, as recent  seismic events have shown, especially in the Mediterranean ar...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Sangiorgio_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=232846&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:20:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The heritage building stock represents a significant element at risk from earthquakes, as recent  seismic events have shown, especially in the Mediterranean ar...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heritage building stock represents a significant element at risk from earthquakes, as recent &lt;br /&gt;
seismic events have shown, especially in the Mediterranean area. In fact, in the last few years, &lt;br /&gt;
the issue of assessing its seismic vulnerability has been widely discussed by the scientific &lt;br /&gt;
community. The vulnerability assessment procedures involve many critical points related to the &lt;br /&gt;
complexity and uncertainty of the parameters involved. If a detailed analysis of the individual &lt;br /&gt;
buildings is to be performed this of course requires a great effort in both the data retrieval, &lt;br /&gt;
modelling and analysis phases. &lt;br /&gt;
In particular, historical masonry churches have been studied in detail in Italy and empirical &lt;br /&gt;
approaches have been proposed in which a vulnerability index based on the classification of &lt;br /&gt;
recurrent failure mechanisms is defined, exploiting a macro-elements approach to identify the &lt;br /&gt;
parameters  that  influence  the  index.  On  the  other  hand,  intangible  aspects  related  to  the &lt;br /&gt;
architectural, historical and artistic value are not included in the Index, either in the structural &lt;br /&gt;
parts themselves or in additional non-structural elements or contents. &lt;br /&gt;
This paper proposes a procedure that combines the well-known vulnerability analysis based on &lt;br /&gt;
the  macro-elements  approach  and  classification  of  recurrent  failure  mechanisms  with  an &lt;br /&gt;
evaluation  of  the  church’s  architectural  and  artistic  assets,  such  as  frescoes,  statues  and &lt;br /&gt;
paintings, by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The novel procedure is integrated in a &lt;br /&gt;
useful  Decision  Support  System  to  provide  a  complete  overview  of  a  church’s  structural &lt;br /&gt;
condition,  including  its  artworks,  in  order  to  create  a  priority  scale  for  the  assessment, &lt;br /&gt;
retrofitting and protection of existing masonry churches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_246058912p1199.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Canuti, C., S. Carbonari, A. Dall’Asta, L. Dezi, F. Gara, G. Leoni, M. Morici, E. Petrucci,  A. Prota, and A. Zona. 2019. Post- earthquake damage and vulnerability assessment of  churches  in  the  Marche  Region  struck  by  the  2016  central  Italy  seismic  sequence.  International  Journal  of  Architectural  Heritage  1–22.  doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1653403.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, and F. Fatiguso. 2018. User-reporting based semeiotic assessment of existing building stock at the regional scale. Journal of Performance of Constructed  Facilities 32 (6):04018079. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943- 5509.0001227.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, F. Fatiguso, and J. M. Adam. 2019. A new index to evaluate  exposure and potential damage to RC building structures in coastal areas. Engineering  Failure Analysis 100:439–55. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.052.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] Lagomarsino,  S.,  S.  Podestà,  G.  Cifani,  and  A.  Lemme.  2004.  The  31st  October  2002 earthquake  in  Molise  (Italy):  A  new  methodology  for  the  damage  and  seismic  vulnerability survey of churches. Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake  Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1–6.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] Sangiorgio,  V.,  Uva,  G.,  and  Adam,  J.  M.  2020.  Integrated  Seismic  Vulnerability  Assessment of Historical Masonry Churches Including Architectural and Artistic Assets  Based on Macro-element Approach. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1- 14. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1709916.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International  journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, and F. Fatiguso. 2017. Optimized AHP to overcome limits in weigh  calculation: A building perfor- mance application. Journal of Construction Engineering  and Management. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001418.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Uva,  G.,  Sangiorgio,  V.,  Ruggieri,  S.,  &amp;amp;amp;  Fatiguso,  F.  (2019).  Structural  vulnerability  assessment of masonry churches supported by user-reported data and modern Internet of  Things (IoT). Measurement, 131, 183-192.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9] Sangiorgio, V., Uva, G., &amp;amp;amp; Fatiguso, F. (2016). A procedure to assess the criticalities of  structures built in absence of earthquake resistant criteria. REHABEND, 2016, 631-639.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10] De Matteis, G., E. Criber, and G. Brando. 2016. Damage probability matrices for three- nave  masonry  churches  in  Abruzzi  after  the  2009  L’Aquila  earthquake.  International  Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):120–45.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11] De  Matteis,  G.,  G.  Brando,  and  V.  Corlito.  2019a.  Predictive  model  for  seismic  vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of  Earthquake Engineering 17 (9):4909–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12] Jokilehto, J. 2006. World heritage: Defining the outstanding universal value. City and  Time 2 (2):1.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13] İpekoğlu, B. 2006. An architectural evaluation method for con- servation of traditional  dwellings.  Building  and  Environment  41  (3):386–94.  doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.009.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14] Ghizzi, S. 1994. Aspetti economici del restauro archeolgoico, in Note di Economia dei  Beni  Culturali  ed  Ambientali.  Rivista  di  Analisi  dei  Problemi  di  Finanziamento,  Valutazione e Gestione dei Progetti di Investimento per il Restauro e la Valorizzazione  dei Beni Culturali, Anno II, Numero 1, Roma. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77044-2.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[15] Sangiorgio,  V.,  Martiradonna,  S.,  Uva,  G.,  &amp;amp;amp;  Fatiguso,  F.  (2017,  September).  An  information  system  for  masonry  building  monitoring.  In  2017  IEEE  International  Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI) (pp. 230-235).  IEEE.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>