https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Rodrigues%2A_et_al_2024a 2026-05-10T08:19:46Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rodrigues*_et_al_2024a&diff=302662&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:11:03Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_715379198" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 715379198">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 715379198</a> to <a href="/public/Rodrigues*_et_al_2024a" title="Rodrigues* et al 2024a">Rodrigues* et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:11, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rodrigues*_et_al_2024a&diff=302661&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:10:57Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:10, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Residual soils are non-textbook materials that are hard to be modelled by traditional soil mechanics, which creates serious difficulties in the in-situ test interpretations and the consequent applications to geotechnical design. This is due to the presence of a cementation structure that is responsible for a cohesive-frictional behaviour of these soils, meaning that two strength parameters must be derived to represent the overall strength. Furthermore, cementation structure also deeply affects the stiffness behaviour, deviating from typical response of transported soils. The common interpretation of in-situ tests usually considers extreme behaviours represented by only one parameter, namely undrained cohesion for clays and angle of shearing resistance for sands, which naturally do not work in these cohesive-frictional materials. For this purpose, only tests that take two or more independent measurements can be used to solve this problem, as it is the case of SCPTu, SDMT and PMT tests, while SPT and DPSH tests cannot be effective in this determination. Portuguese research institutions have been looking over the granitic residual soil characterization through specific research works, from which resulted several publications on the subject. Following previous research works of calibration with (S)DMT (Cruz, 2010) and (S)CPTu (Cruz et al. 2018) tests performed in Polytechnic Institute of Guarda (IPG), Portugal, a new research frame was developed to settle a methodology for obtaining strength parameters of granitic residual soils from pressuremeter tests (PMT), which is presented and discussed herein.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Residual soils are non-textbook materials that are hard to be modelled by traditional soil mechanics, which creates serious difficulties in the in-situ test interpretations and the consequent applications to geotechnical design. This is due to the presence of a cementation structure that is responsible for a cohesive-frictional behaviour of these soils, meaning that two strength parameters must be derived to represent the overall strength. Furthermore, cementation structure also deeply affects the stiffness behaviour, deviating from typical response of transported soils. The common interpretation of in-situ tests usually considers extreme behaviours represented by only one parameter, namely undrained cohesion for clays and angle of shearing resistance for sands, which naturally do not work in these cohesive-frictional materials. For this purpose, only tests that take two or more independent measurements can be used to solve this problem, as it is the case of SCPTu, SDMT and PMT tests, while SPT and DPSH tests cannot be effective in this determination. Portuguese research institutions have been looking over the granitic residual soil characterization through specific research works, from which resulted several publications on the subject. Following previous research works of calibration with (S)DMT (Cruz, 2010) and (S)CPTu (Cruz et al. 2018) tests performed in Polytechnic Institute of Guarda (IPG), Portugal, a new research frame was developed to settle a methodology for obtaining strength parameters of granitic residual soils from pressuremeter tests (PMT), which is presented and discussed herein.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_71537919853.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rodrigues*_et_al_2024a&diff=302659&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:10:56Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:10, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Residual soils are non-textbook materials that are hard to be modelled by traditional soil mechanics, which creates serious difficulties in the in-situ test interpretations and the consequent applications to geotechnical design. This is due to the presence of a cementation structure that is responsible for a cohesive-frictional behaviour of these soils, meaning that two strength parameters must be derived to represent the overall strength. Furthermore, cementation structure also deeply affects the stiffness behaviour, deviating from typical response of transported soils. The common interpretation of in-situ tests usually considers extreme behaviours represented by only one parameter, namely undrained cohesion for clays and angle of shearing resistance for sands, which naturally do not work in these cohesive-frictional materials. For this purpose, only tests that take two or more independent measurements can be used to solve this problem, as it is the case of SCPTu, SDMT and PMT tests, while SPT and DPSH tests cannot be effective in this determination. Portuguese research institutions have been looking over the granitic residual soil characterization through specific research works, from which resulted several publications on the subject. Following previous research works of calibration with (S)DMT (Cruz, 2010) and (S)CPTu (Cruz et al. 2018) tests performed in Polytechnic Institute of Guarda (IPG), Portugal, a new research frame was developed to settle a methodology for obtaining strength parameters of granitic residual soils from pressuremeter tests (PMT), which is presented and discussed herein.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rodrigues*_et_al_2024a&diff=302658&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:10:54Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez