https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Rahimi_et_al_2024aRahimi et al 2024a - Revision history2026-05-10T12:38:01ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rahimi_et_al_2024a&diff=300819&oldid=prevJSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 732104511 to Rahimi et al 2024a2024-06-06T12:43:38Z<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_732104511" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 732104511">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 732104511</a> to <a href="/public/Rahimi_et_al_2024a" title="Rahimi et al 2024a">Rahimi et al 2024a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:43, 6 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rahimi_et_al_2024a&diff=300818&oldid=prevJSanchez at 12:43, 6 June 20242024-06-06T12:43:32Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:43, 6 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This study demonstrates the value of combining multiple non-invasive geophysical methods through a case study at a landslide along Highway 7 near Jasper, Arkansas, USA. Geophysical testing was conducted using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) along with select borings. Geophysical testing was aimed to provide a high-resolution and almost continuous image of subsurface conditions (including bedrock depth) for the slide area and to locate the groundwater table/highly saturated zones within the slide area which contribute to the slope movement. MASW revealed a highly variable depth to the weathered bedrock along the observed zone of displacement becoming shallower downslope. ERT detected saturated zones associated with observed seeps and springs in the area which were feeding water into the unstable zone. A low resistivity zone on the north side correlated to wet spots, while south of the highway saturation occurred near the deeper bedrock interface. Additionally, using a grid pattern HVSR approach, a high-resolution image of the shallow and complex bedrock topography was generated across the slide area providing valuable information for the repair design. Overall, the results of the combined geophysical approach provide a high-resolution image of landslide subsurface conditions which is critical for stability analyses and slope repair design. This integrated geophysical approach offers a more sustainable, rapid, and cost-effective solution for comprehensive landslide characterization and slope stability assessment when combined with conventional methods.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This study demonstrates the value of combining multiple non-invasive geophysical methods through a case study at a landslide along Highway 7 near Jasper, Arkansas, USA. Geophysical testing was conducted using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) along with select borings. Geophysical testing was aimed to provide a high-resolution and almost continuous image of subsurface conditions (including bedrock depth) for the slide area and to locate the groundwater table/highly saturated zones within the slide area which contribute to the slope movement. MASW revealed a highly variable depth to the weathered bedrock along the observed zone of displacement becoming shallower downslope. ERT detected saturated zones associated with observed seeps and springs in the area which were feeding water into the unstable zone. A low resistivity zone on the north side correlated to wet spots, while south of the highway saturation occurred near the deeper bedrock interface. Additionally, using a grid pattern HVSR approach, a high-resolution image of the shallow and complex bedrock topography was generated across the slide area providing valuable information for the repair design. Overall, the results of the combined geophysical approach provide a high-resolution image of landslide subsurface conditions which is critical for stability analyses and slope repair design. This integrated geophysical approach offers a more sustainable, rapid, and cost-effective solution for comprehensive landslide characterization and slope stability assessment when combined with conventional methods.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><pdf>Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_732104511236.pdf</pdf></ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:300816:newid:300818 -->
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rahimi_et_al_2024a&diff=300816&oldid=prevJSanchez at 12:43, 6 June 20242024-06-06T12:43:28Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:43, 6 June 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">                                </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">This study demonstrates the value of combining multiple non-invasive geophysical methods through a case study at a landslide along Highway 7 near Jasper, Arkansas, USA. Geophysical testing was conducted using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR), and Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) along with select borings. Geophysical testing was aimed to provide a high-resolution and almost continuous image of subsurface conditions (including bedrock depth) for the slide area and to locate the groundwater table/highly saturated zones within the slide area which contribute to the slope movement. MASW revealed a highly variable depth to the weathered bedrock along the observed zone of displacement becoming shallower downslope. ERT detected saturated zones associated with observed seeps and springs in the area which were feeding water into the unstable zone. A low resistivity zone on the north side correlated to wet spots, while south of the highway saturation occurred near the deeper bedrock interface. Additionally, using a grid pattern HVSR approach, a high-resolution image of the shallow and complex bedrock topography was generated across the slide area providing valuable information for the repair design. Overall, the results of the combined geophysical approach provide a high-resolution image of landslide subsurface conditions which is critical for stability analyses and slope repair design. This integrated geophysical approach offers a more sustainable, rapid, and cost-effective solution for comprehensive landslide characterization and slope stability assessment when combined with conventional methods.</ins></div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:300815:newid:300816 -->
</table>JSanchezhttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Rahimi_et_al_2024a&diff=300815&oldid=prevJSanchez: Created blank page2024-06-06T12:43:26Z<p>Created blank page</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>JSanchez