https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Quaglia%2A_Cueto_2024a Quaglia* Cueto 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-09T08:44:31Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Quaglia*_Cueto_2024a&diff=301891&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 272073792 to Quaglia* Cueto 2024a 2024-06-07T11:37:13Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_272073792" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 272073792">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 272073792</a> to <a href="/public/Quaglia*_Cueto_2024a" title="Quaglia* Cueto 2024a">Quaglia* Cueto 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:37, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Quaglia*_Cueto_2024a&diff=301890&oldid=prev JSanchez at 11:37, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T11:37:08Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:37, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This paper presents the implementation of a Cone Penetration Test (CPT)-based methodology to identify fluid-like tailings in the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) pond to support a TSF deconstruction. The TSF discussed in this paper was partially raised upstream and classified as very high risk due to its location, next to a creek and a short distance to the downstream community. The owner's preferred mitigation strategy was to proceed with the TSF deconstruction. To inform the deconstruction planning, a comprehensive geotechnical site investigation was conducted, which included CPTu and boreholes with continuous thin wall tube sampling from a floating platform. The investigation identified tailings in the pond as high plasticity clays (CH) with a geotechnical fines content exceeding 95 %. The CPT results indicated low tip resistance, nearly linear pore pressure measurements, and minimal sleeve friction, suggesting the presence of fluid-like tailings in a significant portion of the TSF. The implementation of this methodology allowed to systematically confirm the presence of fluid-like tailings across the pond and define their extent. This information supported the owner’s decision to employ mechanical excavation taking advantage of the tailings flowability. The observations made during the tailings excavation confirmed a good agreement between the CPT assessment and the actual material behaviour. These findings underscore the efficacy of the CPT-based method in guiding safe TSF deconstruction projects</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This paper presents the implementation of a Cone Penetration Test (CPT)-based methodology to identify fluid-like tailings in the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) pond to support a TSF deconstruction. The TSF discussed in this paper was partially raised upstream and classified as very high risk due to its location, next to a creek and a short distance to the downstream community. The owner's preferred mitigation strategy was to proceed with the TSF deconstruction. To inform the deconstruction planning, a comprehensive geotechnical site investigation was conducted, which included CPTu and boreholes with continuous thin wall tube sampling from a floating platform. The investigation identified tailings in the pond as high plasticity clays (CH) with a geotechnical fines content exceeding 95 %. The CPT results indicated low tip resistance, nearly linear pore pressure measurements, and minimal sleeve friction, suggesting the presence of fluid-like tailings in a significant portion of the TSF. The implementation of this methodology allowed to systematically confirm the presence of fluid-like tailings across the pond and define their extent. This information supported the owner’s decision to employ mechanical excavation taking advantage of the tailings flowability. The observations made during the tailings excavation confirmed a good agreement between the CPT assessment and the actual material behaviour. These findings underscore the efficacy of the CPT-based method in guiding safe TSF deconstruction projects</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_27207379258.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301888:newid:301890 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Quaglia*_Cueto_2024a&diff=301888&oldid=prev JSanchez at 11:37, 7 June 2024 2024-06-07T11:37:06Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:37, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">This paper presents the implementation of a Cone Penetration Test (CPT)-based methodology to identify fluid-like tailings in the Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) pond to support a TSF deconstruction. The TSF discussed in this paper was partially raised upstream and classified as very high risk due to its location, next to a creek and a short distance to the downstream community. The owner's preferred mitigation strategy was to proceed with the TSF deconstruction. To inform the deconstruction planning, a comprehensive geotechnical site investigation was conducted, which included CPTu and boreholes with continuous thin wall tube sampling from a floating platform. The investigation identified tailings in the pond as high plasticity clays (CH) with a geotechnical fines content exceeding 95 %. The CPT results indicated low tip resistance, nearly linear pore pressure measurements, and minimal sleeve friction, suggesting the presence of fluid-like tailings in a significant portion of the TSF. The implementation of this methodology allowed to systematically confirm the presence of fluid-like tailings across the pond and define their extent. This information supported the owner’s decision to employ mechanical excavation taking advantage of the tailings flowability. The observations made during the tailings excavation confirmed a good agreement between the CPT assessment and the actual material behaviour. These findings underscore the efficacy of the CPT-based method in guiding safe TSF deconstruction projects</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:301887:newid:301888 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Quaglia*_Cueto_2024a&diff=301887&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-07T11:37:05Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez