Qu 2024a - Revision history

Derekqu212: Derekqu212 moved page Draft Qu 634732210 to Qu 2024a

2024-07-12T04:32:28Z

Derekqu212 moved page Draft Qu 634732210 to Qu 2024a

Derekqu212 at 04:27, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:27:00Z

Derekqu212 at 04:26, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:26:23Z

Derekqu212 at 04:25, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:25:59Z

Show changes

Derekqu212 at 04:17, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:17:38Z

Derekqu212 at 04:15, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:15:58Z

Derekqu212 at 04:12, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:12:16Z

Derekqu212 at 04:09, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:09:03Z

Derekqu212 at 04:08, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T04:08:23Z

Derekqu212 at 03:45, 12 July 2024

2024-07-12T03:45:59Z

@@ Line 148: / Line 148: @@
 [12] Zeni, Thomas A., et al. “Making “sense” of ethical decision making.” ScienceDirect, December 2016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1048984316300716. Accessed 29 April 2024.
 ==Appendix==
-# Emotional Intelligence Questions
+. Emotional Intelligence Questions
 * Do you often reflect on your own emotions and understand why you feel a certain way?
 * Can you easily recognize when you are stressed or under pressure?
@@ Line 168: / Line 168: @@
 * Can you maintain a sense of balance and well-being, even during demanding times?
 * Do you actively work to build and maintain positive relationships with others?
-* Are you supportive of the emotional well-being of those around you?    2. Ethical Decision-making Questions
+* Are you supportive of the emotional well-being of those around you?
 * 1) Confidentiality: You’re at school and overhear your teacher discussing another student's confidential information with someone who is not involved in the student. What should you do?
 * 2) School Integrity: Your classmate asks you to manipulate some lab data to make the procedure's performance look better than it actually is. What is the most ethical course of action?

@@ Line 168: / Line 168: @@
 * Can you maintain a sense of balance and well-being, even during demanding times?
 * Do you actively work to build and maintain positive relationships with others?
-* Are you supportive of the emotional well-being of those around you?  2. Ethical Decision-making Questions
+* Are you supportive of the emotional well-being of those around you?    2. Ethical Decision-making Questions
 * 1) Confidentiality: You’re at school and overhear your teacher discussing another student's confidential information with someone who is not involved in the student. What should you do?

@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 [1] Albert, Dustin, et al. “Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making - PMC.” NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276317/. Accessed 24 April 2024.
 [2] Boretti, James. “Ethics Questionnaire.” 9 June 2002, https://osec.sccgov.org/sites/g/files/exjcpb1071/files/EthicsTheLineforSHandE.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2024.
 [3] Collado-Soler, Rocio. “Emotional Intelligence and Resilience Outcomes in Adolescent Period, is Knowledge Really Strength?” NCBI, 22 April 2023, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132289/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 [4] Drigas, Athanasios S., and Chara Papoutsi. “A New Layered Model on Emotional Intelligence.” NCBI, 2 May 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981239/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 [5] “A Framework for Ethical Decision Making - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.” Santa Clara University, 5 November 2021, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/. Accessed 29 April 2024.
 [6] Goleman, Daniel. “What is Emotional Intelligence?” UNH Scholars' Repository, 1 January 2004, https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=personality_lab. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 [7] Greene, JD, et al. “An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.” PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11557895/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 [8] Jordan, Peter J., et al. "Workgroup Emotional Intelligence: Scale Development and Relationship to Team Process Effectiveness and Goal Focusing." Human Resource Management Review, vol. 12, no. 2, 2002, pp. 195–214.
 [9] Kohlberg, Lawrence et al. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. Harper & Row, 1981.
 [10] Romanelli, Frank, et al. “Emotional Intelligence as a Predictor of Academic and/or Professional Success.” NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1636947/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 [11] Suarez, Victoria D., et al. “Examination of Ethical Decision-Making Models Across Disciplines: Common Elements and Application to the Field of Behavior Analysis.” NCBI, 29 November 2022, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480129/. Accessed 29 April 2024.
 [12] Zeni, Thomas A., et al. “Making “sense” of ethical decision making.” ScienceDirect, December 2016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1048984316300716. Accessed 29 April 2024.

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 In conclusion, Emotional Intelligence plays a crucial role in ethical decision-making, offering a lens through which to understand and navigate the complexities of moral reasoning. As educators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the education system, fostering emotional intelligence skills should be a priority, ensuring that our future leaders are equipped to make ethical decisions that positively impact society.
-==3 Bibliography<!--
+[1] Albert, Dustin, et al. “Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making - PMC.” NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276317/. Accessed 24 April 2024.
-Citations in text will follow a citation-sequence system (i.e. sources are numbered by order of reference so that the first reference cited in the document is [1], the second [2], and so on) with the number of the reference in square brackets. Once a source has been cited, the same number is used in all subsequent references. If the numbers are not in a continuous sequence, use commas (with no spaces) between numbers. If you have more than two numbers in a continuous sequence, use the first and last number of the sequence joined by a hyphen
+[2] Boretti, James. “Ethics Questionnaire.” 9 June 2002, https://osec.sccgov.org/sites/g/files/exjcpb1071/files/EthicsTheLineforSHandE.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2024.
+[3] Collado-Soler, Rocio. “Emotional Intelligence and Resilience Outcomes in Adolescent Period, is Knowledge Really Strength?” NCBI, 22 April 2023, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132289/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
-You should ensure that all references are cited in the text and that the reference list. References should preferably refer to documents published in Scipedia. Unpublished results should not be included in the reference list, but can be mentioned in the text. The reference data must be updated once publication is ready. Complete bibliographic information for all cited references must be given following the standards in the field (IEEE and ISO 690 standards are recommended). If possible, a hyperlink to the referenced publication should be given. See examples for Scipedia’s articles [1], other publication articles [2], books [3], book chapter [4], conference proceedings [5], and online documents [6], shown in references section below. -->==
+[4] Drigas, Athanasios S., and Chara Papoutsi. “A New Layered Model on Emotional Intelligence.” NCBI, 2 May 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5981239/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
+[5] “A Framework for Ethical Decision Making - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.” Santa Clara University, 5 November 2021, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/. Accessed 29 April 2024.
+[6] Goleman, Daniel. “What is Emotional Intelligence?” UNH Scholars' Repository, 1 January 2004, https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=personality_lab. Accessed 28 April 2024.
+[7] Greene, JD, et al. “An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.” PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11557895/. Accessed 28 April 2024.
 ==4 Acknowledgments<!-- Acknowledgments should be inserted at the end of the document, before the references section. -->==

@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
 Table 3: Average Ethical Score in terms of EI
-{|
+[[File:Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 10.06.17 PM.png|none|thumb]]
-!EI Score
-!Average Ethical
-−
-Score
-|-
-|7
-|0
-|-
-|8
-|0
-|-
-|9
-|1.57
-|-
-|10
-|1.42
-|-
-|11
-|3.45
-|-
-|12
-|3
-|-
-|13
-|2
-|-
-|14
-|4
-|-
-|15
-|4
-|-
-|16
-|3.6
-|-
-|17
-|4.5
-|-
-|18
-|4.6
-|}
 Additionally, a separate survey was conducted with the same sample of teenagers where respondents were asked to pick what they would do in the scenario compared to what they thought was the best decision in the original survey. This separate survey was conducted because the researcher hypothesized that students would choose differently depending on the situation. According to Dustin Albert a professor at Duke University, When adolescents are in the presence of peers, their risk-taking behavior increases significantly compared to when they are alone. This is not observed to the same extent in adults. (Albert et al.) Making decisions may seem inherently simple however we can see how this may not be the case in many situations. For example, making the decision to recycle is generally easy and is widely recognized as an important step towards conserving natural resources, reducing pollution, and combating climate change. Many people are aware of the benefits of recycling and understand the importance of separating recyclable materials from regular waste to minimize environmental harm. However, putting this decision into action can be challenging due to various obstacles.
@@ Line 112: / Line 71: @@
  Table 6: Survey 2 Average Ethical Score in terms of EI
-[[File:Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 10.31.33 PM.png|none|thumb]]
+[[File:Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 10.31.33 PM.png|none|thumb|469x469px]]
 '''Discussion'''

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:32, 12 July 2024
(No difference)

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 Table 1: Evaluated EI Score
-{|
+[[File:Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 10.04.57 PM.png|none|thumb|582x582px]]
-−
-|Low EI
-−
--7
-|Developing EI
-−
--12
-|Moderate EI
-−
--16
-|High EI
-−
--20
-|-
-|Number of Students
-|2
-|35
-|17
-|13
-|}
 Consequently, respondents were given 5 ethical dilemmas in school settings. Each dilemma had 3 answer choices, ranging from unethical to most ethical. The most common correctly answered dilemma was the personal integrity dilemma followed by the school integrity, confidentiality, environmental responsibility and diversity and inclusion with the most incorrect answers. On average respondents got a score of 2.67 out of 5 points on the ethical dilemma survey shown on table 2.

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 Table 2: Ethical Decision-Making Scores
-{|
+[[File:Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 10.03.59 PM.png|none|thumb|582x582px]]
-|Score(X/5):
-|0 - Low
-|1
-|2
-|3
-|4
-|5 - High
-|-
-|Number of Students:
-|7
-|11
-|11
-|15
-|14
-|9
-|}
 Table 3: Average Ethical Score in terms of EI