https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Pinto%2A_et_al_2024b 2026-05-07T18:30:11Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Pinto*_et_al_2024b&diff=302036&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T12:00:41Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_640587528" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 640587528">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 640587528</a> to <a href="/public/Pinto*_et_al_2024b" title="Pinto* et al 2024b">Pinto* et al 2024b</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:00, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Pinto*_et_al_2024b&diff=302035&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T12:00:35Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:00, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The evaluation of in-situ behaviour, strength and compressibility of a soil profile is routinely performed by geotechnical engineers through field tests, such as the seismic piezocone penetration test (SCPTu), the flat dilatometer test (DMT) and the field vane shear test (FVT). This paper aims to compare the results of a CPTu, DMT and FVT to evaluate an organic alluvium soil in terms of: i) in-situ soil behaviour classification, ii) undrained shear strength and iii) stress history. To compare and complement the in-situ results, laboratory tests were carried out to determine the grain-size distribution, the Atterberg Limits, the pre-consolidation pressure, the organic content and the undrained shear strength under isotropic consolidation triaxial test (CIUC). The results showed that the soil evaluated herein exhibited a clay-like behaviour based on the classification system of both tests (DMT and SCPTu), which agrees with the laboratory characterization. Furthermore, the OCR (overconsolidation ratio) calculated from the SCPTu and DMT also shows a convergence with the values determined from laboratory tests. The SCPTu performed in this soil was predominantly undrained and enabled the calculation of undrained shear strength. Based on this, the methodologies based on Nkt and N∆u (from SCPTu) were compared with the undrained shear strength from the FVT and that obtained from DMT, based on the KD parameter. Finally, a comparison is presented to discuss the influence of shear mode in the undrained shear strength and the applicability of the methodologies used to evaluate the soil behaviour and the stress history.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The evaluation of in-situ behaviour, strength and compressibility of a soil profile is routinely performed by geotechnical engineers through field tests, such as the seismic piezocone penetration test (SCPTu), the flat dilatometer test (DMT) and the field vane shear test (FVT). This paper aims to compare the results of a CPTu, DMT and FVT to evaluate an organic alluvium soil in terms of: i) in-situ soil behaviour classification, ii) undrained shear strength and iii) stress history. To compare and complement the in-situ results, laboratory tests were carried out to determine the grain-size distribution, the Atterberg Limits, the pre-consolidation pressure, the organic content and the undrained shear strength under isotropic consolidation triaxial test (CIUC). The results showed that the soil evaluated herein exhibited a clay-like behaviour based on the classification system of both tests (DMT and SCPTu), which agrees with the laboratory characterization. Furthermore, the OCR (overconsolidation ratio) calculated from the SCPTu and DMT also shows a convergence with the values determined from laboratory tests. The SCPTu performed in this soil was predominantly undrained and enabled the calculation of undrained shear strength. Based on this, the methodologies based on Nkt and N∆u (from SCPTu) were compared with the undrained shear strength from the FVT and that obtained from DMT, based on the KD parameter. Finally, a comparison is presented to discuss the influence of shear mode in the undrained shear strength and the applicability of the methodologies used to evaluate the soil behaviour and the stress history.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_640587528204.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Pinto*_et_al_2024b&diff=302033&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T12:00:33Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:00, 7 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The evaluation of in-situ behaviour, strength and compressibility of a soil profile is routinely performed by geotechnical engineers through field tests, such as the seismic piezocone penetration test (SCPTu), the flat dilatometer test (DMT) and the field vane shear test (FVT). This paper aims to compare the results of a CPTu, DMT and FVT to evaluate an organic alluvium soil in terms of: i) in-situ soil behaviour classification, ii) undrained shear strength and iii) stress history. To compare and complement the in-situ results, laboratory tests were carried out to determine the grain-size distribution, the Atterberg Limits, the pre-consolidation pressure, the organic content and the undrained shear strength under isotropic consolidation triaxial test (CIUC). The results showed that the soil evaluated herein exhibited a clay-like behaviour based on the classification system of both tests (DMT and SCPTu), which agrees with the laboratory characterization. Furthermore, the OCR (overconsolidation ratio) calculated from the SCPTu and DMT also shows a convergence with the values determined from laboratory tests. The SCPTu performed in this soil was predominantly undrained and enabled the calculation of undrained shear strength. Based on this, the methodologies based on Nkt and N∆u (from SCPTu) were compared with the undrained shear strength from the FVT and that obtained from DMT, based on the KD parameter. Finally, a comparison is presented to discuss the influence of shear mode in the undrained shear strength and the applicability of the methodologies used to evaluate the soil behaviour and the stress history.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Pinto*_et_al_2024b&diff=302032&oldid=prev 2024-06-07T12:00:32Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez