Philip et al 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 18:45, 11 March 2021

2021-03-11T18:45:14Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 182315947 to Philip et al 2021a

2021-03-11T16:10:42Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 182315947 to Philip et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size a..."

2021-03-11T16:10:38Z

Created page with "== Abstract == In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size a..."

New page

== Abstract ==

In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of D

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_182315947p2638.pdf</pdf>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Abstract ==
-In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of D
+In the current clinical practice, the rupture risk prediction of fusiform aneurysms is based on maximum diameter. This approach does not account for the size and shape dependent cyclic stresses arising due to fluid-solid interaction (FSI). Previous fluid-structure interaction studies by the authors on model two dimensional fusiform aneurysms (abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)) has revealed that the maximum diameter to height ratio (DHr) could possibly be used as a critical parameter, since it can signify the hemodynamic and biomechanical stresses [7]. Hence the present study assesses whether the observations from the shape index based 2D simulations hold good in realistic 3D conditions as well. Based on the preliminary investigations, it is hypothesized, that a combination of Dmax and DHr would
 == Full document ==
 <pdf>Media:Draft_Content_182315947p2638.pdf</pdf>

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:10, 11 March 2021
(No difference)