Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 157298123 to Petrovic et al 2021a

2021-11-30T13:20:20Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 157298123 to Petrovic et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a structural design methodology in order to find the best possible solution of protective structures for active archeological sites. Besid..."

2021-11-30T13:20:17Z

Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a structural design methodology in order to find the best possible solution of protective structures for active archeological sites. Besid..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This paper presents a structural design methodology in order to find the best
possible solution of protective structures for active archeological sites. Besides the typical
demands for construction on these sites which arise from the typology and the level of
protection of cultural heritage, active archeological sites require a structural solution with
regard to time and direction of further excavation. The hypothesis is that modular
spatial structures which are easily assembled or disassembled, and have the ability to be
extended in one or more directions, are the most functional solution for these sites.
This paper shows the analysis of several types of spatial structures based on the
requirements of active archeological sites. It explores the possibilities of structural systems
derived from multiplication of one primary element of structure, their material and joints
between elements. The most adequate assembly of the entire structure is supposed to
be found in the interdependency of the load and the dimension of the element’s cross-
section, in a suitable geometric configuration. The focus of the analysis is on structures
made of short-bearing elements which have the advantage of the efficiency of transport and
assembling.
One of the design criteria for this methodology is that the structural system itself looks
simple and elegant in order to complement the archeological site. This is shown in the paper
through the analysis of patterns in which these structures are assembled. The aim is to
correlate the position of the elements in the structural system, the dimensions of cross-section,
and the lengths of the straight beams which form the spatial structure in order to find a
simple, functional and economical solution for protective structures at active archeological
sites.
The conclusion shows the advantages and disadvantages of the design methodology
presented in the paper, as well as the discussion about the analyzed spatial structures. This
type of methodology that systematizes various design criteria from different fields of
research engages the problem of design of protective structures for archeological sites and opens up new questions for further research.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_157298123p709.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] Cambridge University Press. Cambrigde Dictionary. Retrieved from Meaning of archaeology in English, (2020, January 31): https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/archaeology

[2] Nikolić, E. Evaluation of the protection and presentation of historic buildings in the Viminacium Archaeological Park in relation to their spatial context. Spatium, (2018), pp. 26-37.

[3] Nerdinger, W., Meissner, I., Möller, E., & Grđanski, M. Frei Otto Complete Works: Lightweight construction - natural design. Basel: Birkhäuser, (2005)

[4] Fuller, R. B., Inventions - The patented works of R. Buckminster Fuller. New York: St. Martin’s press, (1983), pp. 129.

[5] United States of America Patent No. 2,682,235, 1954

[6] Fuller, R. B., & Applewhite, E. Synergetics. Sebastopol: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc, (1975, 1979).

[7] Popovic Larsen, O. Reciprocal Frame Architecture. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, (2003)

[8] Song, P., Fu, C.-W., Goswami, P., Zheng, J., Mitra, N. J., & Cohen-Or, D. An Interactive Computational Design Tool for Large. Nexus Network Journal, (2014) pp. 109-118.

[9] Tamke, M., Rüber, J., & Jungjohanne, H. Lamella Flock. In C. Ceccato, L. Hesselgren, M. Pauly, H. Pottmann, & J. Wallner, Advances in Architectural Geometry 2010, Vienna: Springer. (2010), pp. 37-48.

[10] Ceccato, C., Hesselgren, L., Pauly, M., Pottmann, H., & Wallner, J. Advances in Architectural Geometry 2010. Vienna: Springer. (2010).

[11] Weller, B. Lamella Roof Constructions by Hugo Junkers. Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures, Valencia: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia. (2009), pp. 1611-1621

[12] Hertzberg, M., & Lloyd Wright, F. Wright in Racine: The Architect's Vision for One American City. San Francisco: Pomegranate, (2004)

[13] Balz, M. Phantasy in space. An Anthology of Structural Morfology, (2009), pp. 112.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:20, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

Petrovic et al 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 157298123 to Petrovic et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a structural design methodology in order to find the best possible solution of protective structures for active archeological sites. Besid..."