<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Peterson_2012a</id>
		<title>Peterson 2012a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Peterson_2012a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Peterson_2012a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T13:32:17Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Peterson_2012a&amp;diff=190783&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 876220088 to Peterson 2012a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Peterson_2012a&amp;diff=190783&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-01-26T17:12:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_876220088&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 876220088&quot;&gt;Draft Content 876220088&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Peterson_2012a&quot; title=&quot;Peterson 2012a&quot;&gt;Peterson 2012a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 17:12, 26 January 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Peterson_2012a&amp;diff=190782&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot; == Abstract ==  25 airports have a connection with the local rail transit system, but each is unique. Variables such as network size, train frequency, type of airport station...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Peterson_2012a&amp;diff=190782&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-01-26T17:12:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; == Abstract ==  25 airports have a connection with the local rail transit system, but each is unique. Variables such as network size, train frequency, type of airport station...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
25 airports have a connection with the local rail transit system, but each is unique. Variables such as network size, train frequency, type of airport station, time, and cost vary by airport. Both airport passengers and planners should have a technical basis of selecting which system is the most useful, efficient, and reliable. To date, there have been no scoring procedures created to rank the airports in order of quality of connection. This thesis analyzes rail transit accessibility for all 25 airports (3 of which have 2 separate transit systems) by investigating 8 characteristics, 3 of which are market factors and 5 of which are system factors. The 5 system factors are travel time difference between car and train, transit cost difference between car and train, airport/transit connection type, network size, and train frequency. The 3 market factors are rail transit mode share, business traveler percentage, and low-cost carrier percentage. A scoring system was then developed and each airportâ  s characteristics were inputted. The airports were scored using three different methods and were subsequently evaluated to understand why airports received the scores they did. This evaluation led to a better understanding of airport transit best practices. The scoring system was used again to evaluate an airport (Washington-Dulles) undergoing radical changes to understand by what factor a score can improve. A â  top 10â   list of airport transit connections was produced with JFK coming in first. This method is a starting point for developing a robust system to evaluate transit connections to airports. Master of Science&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Original document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The different versions of the original document can be found in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32772 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32772],&lt;br /&gt;
: [http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05142012-101644 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05142012-101644]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>