Peng et al 2023a - Revision history

Pp00 at 07:49, 2 June 2023

2023-06-02T07:49:55Z

Pp00: Replaced content with "'''''''''''''''
2023-05-25T10:49:42Z

Replaced content with "<span id="_Hlk97732452"></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>''''''<nowiki/>'''<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki..."
Show changes

Pp00: Pp00 moved page Draft Peng 137819056 to Peng et al 2023a

2023-05-25T10:39:11Z

Pp00 moved page Draft Peng 137819056 to Peng et al 2023a

Pp00 at 10:06, 25 May 2023

2023-05-25T10:06:07Z

Pp00 at 09:55, 25 May 2023

2023-05-25T09:55:49Z

Pp00 at 09:19, 25 May 2023

2023-05-25T09:19:06Z

Show changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 2 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<span id="_Hlk97732452"></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>''''''<nowiki/>'''<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>'''''<nowiki/>''</span>	+	<span id="_Hlk97732452"></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">''<nowiki/>'''''<nowiki/>'''<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>'''''<nowiki/>''</span>

@@ Line 678: / Line 678: @@
 |  style="border-bottom: 2pt solid black;text-align: center;vertical-align: bottom;"|0.6923
 |}Figure 4.5 shows that with increasing impact velocity, the particle break ratio initially increases and then decreases at a speed of 70m/s. With a maximum angle of incidence of 20 degrees.[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image64.png|center|342px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
-<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.5 Visual analysis trend chart'''</span></div><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>''''''</span>It can be seen from the range analysis Figure 4.6 that the angle of impact has the largest influence on the crush ratio, followed by the velocity of the impact, and the thickness of the mud wall has little effect.
+<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.5 Visual analysis trend chart'''</span></div><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>'''''</span>It can be seen from the range analysis Figure 4.6 that the angle of impact has the largest influence on the crush ratio, followed by the velocity of the impact, and the thickness of the mud wall has little effect.
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
@@ Line 756: / Line 756: @@
 |}
-For the purposes of this paper, in order to adjust the use of the test prototype, firstly, to change the shape of the new cor plate, and repeating the test of each contraption plate four times, and calculating the materials broken respectively. Insert this optimized component into a proof machine, the relative position is illustrated in Figure 4.7, The left side is the optimized cavity shape, the left side is the sand making machine, and the particle impact velocity is adjusted by controlling the rotational speed of the rotor. Figure 4.8 shows a photograph of the stone wall after impact crushing. The particles can be seen to impact in to the I region of the stone wall, and the stone wall in I area is broken, which is consistent with the definition of the crushing function in I area in the test simulation. A large amount of energy is absorbed into the stone wall and the particles are broken. The material then ejected upwards to Zone II, and the particles from the stone wall on the surface were disrupted by friction, and eventually flew along Zone III of the rock wall with only minor
+For the purposes of this paper, in order to adjust the use of the test prototype, firstly, to change the shape of the new cor plate, and repeating the test of each contraption plate four times, and calculating the materials broken respectively. Insert this optimized component into a proof machine, the relative position is illustrated in Figure 4.7, The left side is the optimized cavity shape, the left side is the sand making machine, and the particle impact velocity is adjusted by controlling the rotational speed of the rotor. Figure 4.8 shows a photograph of the stone wall after impact crushing. The particles can be seen to impact in to the I region of the stone wall, and the stone wall in I area is broken, which is consistent with the definition of the crushing function in I area in the test simulation. A large amount of energy is absorbed into the stone wall and the particles are broken. The material then ejected upwards to Zone II, and the particles from the stone wall on the surface were disrupted by friction, and eventually flew along Zone III of the rock wall with only minor friction. [[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image68.png|center|264px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.7 Installation of test prototype'''</span>[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image69.png|center|240px]]</div>
 friction.[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image68.png|center|264px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.7 Installation of test prototype'''</span>[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image69.png|center|240px]]</div>
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">

@@ Line 284: / Line 284: @@
 {| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
 |-
-| <math>p_{min}=0\mbox{ }\mbox{ }\mbox{ }\mbox{ }�p_{max}=</math><math>\frac{{\theta }_rK_nl^2}{B}</math>
+| <math>p_{min}=0,p_{max}=\theta_rK_nl^2/B</math>
 |}
 | style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (7)
@@ Line 307: / Line 307: @@
 {| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
 |-
-| <math display="inline">M=\left(F_nB\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{l}{3B}\right)�l=</math><math>{\left(\frac{2F_nB}{K_n{\theta }_r}\right)}^{0.5}</math>
+| <math display="inline">M=\left(F_nB\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{l}{3B}\right),l=</math><math>{\left(\frac{2F_nB}{K_n{\theta }_r}\right)}^{0.5}</math>
 |}
 | style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (9)
@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
 {| style="text-align: center; margin:auto;"
 |-
-| <math>M_0=\frac{1}{6}\left(F_nB\right)�{\theta }_\mbox{r}^\mbox{0}\mbox{=}\frac{\mbox{2}F_\mbox{n}}{K_\mbox{n}B}</math>
+| <math>M_0=\frac{1}{6}\left(F_nB\right),{\theta }_\mbox{r}^\mbox{0}\mbox{=}\frac{\mbox{2}F_\mbox{n}}{K_\mbox{n}B}</math>
 |}
 | style="width: 5px;text-align: right;white-space: nowrap;" | (10)
@@ Line 422: / Line 422: @@
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
-（a） 30米/秒</div>
+（a） 30m/s</div>
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
@@ Line 428: / Line 428: @@
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
-（b） 50米/秒</div>
+（b） 50m/s</div>
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
@@ Line 434: / Line 434: @@
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
-（c） 70米/秒</div>
+（c） 70m/s</div>
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
@@ Line 570: / Line 570: @@
 <span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''
 [[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image62.png|center|324px]]
-Figure 4.3 3D printed stone wall shape<br>
+Figure 4.3 3D printed stone wall shape'''<nowiki/>'''
-'''</span></div>The surface is then coated with a layer of stone beating raw materials to perform simulation of the surface contact parameters, which can be seen in Figure 4.4 (limestone, pebble and granite) from the left to the right.[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image63.png|center|396px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
+</div>The surface is then coated with a layer of stone beating raw materials to perform simulation of the surface contact parameters, which can be seen in Figure 4.4 (limestone, pebble and granite) from the left to the right.[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image63.png|center|396px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
 <span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.4 Optimized stone wall shape'''</span></div>
@@ Line 577: / Line 577: @@
 <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
-<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Table 1. Factor level table.'''</span></div>
+<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Table 1. Factor level table'''</span></div>
 {| style="width: 100%;margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;"
@@ Line 756: / Line 756: @@
 |}
+For the purposes of this paper, in order to adjust the use of the test prototype, firstly, to change the shape of the new cor plate, and repeating the test of each contraption plate four times, and calculating the materials broken respectively. Insert this optimized component into a proof machine, the relative position is illustrated in Figure 4.7, The left side is the optimized cavity shape, the left side is the sand making machine, and the particle impact velocity is adjusted by controlling the rotational speed of the rotor. Figure 4.8 shows a photograph of the stone wall after impact crushing. The particles can be seen to impact in to the I region of the stone wall, and the stone wall in I area is broken, which is consistent with the definition of the crushing function in I area in the test simulation. A large amount of energy is absorbed into the stone wall and the particles are broken. The material then ejected upwards to Zone II, and the particles from the stone wall on the surface were disrupted by friction, and eventually flew along Zone III of the rock wall with only minor
-For the purposes of this paper, in order to adjust the use of the test prototype, firstly, to change the shape of the new counter plate, and repeating the test of each contraption plate four times, and calculating the materials broken respectively. Insert this optimized component into a proof machine, the relative position is illustrated in Figure 4.7, The left side is the optimized cavity shape, the left side is the sand making machine, and the particle impact velocity is adjusted by controlling the rotational speed of the rotor. Figure 4.8 shows a photograph of the stone wall after impact crushing. The particles can be seen to impact in to the I region of the stone wall, and the stone wall in I area is broken, which is consistent with the definition of the crushing function in I area in the test simulation. A large amount of energy is absorbed into the stone wall and the particles are broken. The material then ejected upwards to Zone II, and the particles from the stone wall on the surface were disrupted by friction, and eventually flew along Zone III of the rock wall with only minor
 friction.[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image68.png|center|264px]]<div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''Figure 4.7 Installation of test prototype'''</span>[[Image:Draft_Peng_137819056-image69.png|center|240px]]</div>

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:39, 25 May 2023
(No difference)

Peng et al 2023a - Revision history

Pp00 at 07:49, 2 June 2023

Pp00: Replaced content with "''''''''''''''' 2023-05-25T10:49:42Z Replaced content with "<span id="_Hlk97732452"></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>''''''<nowiki/>'''<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki..." Show changes

Pp00: Pp00 moved page Draft Peng 137819056 to Peng et al 2023a

Pp00 at 10:06, 25 May 2023

Pp00 at 09:55, 25 May 2023

Pp00 at 09:19, 25 May 2023

Pp00: Created page with "

Pp00: Replaced content with "'''''''''''''''
2023-05-25T10:49:42Z

Replaced content with "<span id="_Hlk97732452"></span><span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki/>''''''<nowiki/>'''<span style="text-align: center; font-size: 75%;">'''<nowiki..."
Show changes