Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 611894650 to Pariota et al 2016a

2021-01-21T14:42:08Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 611894650 to Pariota et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == In order to address the Signal Setting Design at urban level two main approaches may be pursued: the coordination and the synchronisation approaches depending..."

2021-01-21T14:42:05Z

Created page with " == Abstract == In order to address the Signal Setting Design at urban level two main approaches may be pursued: the coordination and the synchronisation approaches depending..."

New page

== Abstract ==

In order to address the Signal Setting Design at urban level two main approaches may be pursued: the coordination and the synchronisation approaches depending on the steps considered for the optimisation of decision variables (two steps vs. one step). Furthermore, in terms of objective functions mono-criterion or multi-criteria may be adopted. In this paper the coordination approach is implemented considering the multi-criteria optimisation at single junctions and mono-criterion optimisation at network level whereas the synchronisation is implemented considering the mono-criterion optimisation. The main purpose of the paper is the evaluation of the performances of two strategies not only considering indicators such as the total delay, the queue length etc. but also considering other indicators such as the emissions and the fuel consumption. The methodological framework is composed by three stages: (i) the decision variables (green timings and offsets) computation through optimisation methods; (ii) the implementation of optimal signal settings in a microscopic traffic flow simulator (âSimulation of Urban MObilityâ-SUMO); (iii) the estimation of emissions and fuel consumption indicators.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854/1/2016%20Comparing%20Signal%20Setting%20Design%20Methods.pdf http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854/1/2016%20Comparing%20Signal%20Setting%20Design%20Methods.pdf]

* [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_19] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm

* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48944-5_19 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-48944-5_19],
: [https://www.iris.unisa.it/handle/11386/4675051 https://www.iris.unisa.it/handle/11386/4675051],
: [http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854 http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108854],
: [https://www.scipedia.com/public/De_Luca_et_al_2016a https://www.scipedia.com/public/De_Luca_et_al_2016a],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2548390440 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2548390440]

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:42, 21 January 2021
(No difference)

Pariota et al 2016a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 611894650 to Pariota et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == In order to address the Signal Setting Design at urban level two main approaches may be pursued: the coordination and the synchronisation approaches depending..."