https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Ortega_2020bOrtega 2020b - Revision history2026-04-25T07:33:53ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ortega_2020b&diff=269357&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 899835105 to Ortega 2020b2023-02-02T09:32:43Z<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_899835105" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 899835105">Draft Content 899835105</a> to <a href="/public/Ortega_2020b" title="Ortega 2020b">Ortega 2020b</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:32, 2 February 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Scipediacontenthttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ortega_2020b&diff=269356&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The aim of this paper is to review the current and most relevant literature on the use of altmetric providers since 2012. This review is supported by a meta-a..."2023-02-02T09:32:39Z<p>Created page with " == Abstract == The aim of this paper is to review the current and most relevant literature on the use of altmetric providers since 2012. This review is supported by a meta-a..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
== Abstract ==<br />
<br />
The aim of this paper is to review the current and most relevant literature on the use of altmetric providers since 2012. This review is supported by a meta-analysis of the coverage and metric counts obtained by more than 100 publications that have used these bibliographic platforms for altmetric studies. The article is the most comprehensive analysis of altmetric data providers (Lagotto, Altmetric.com, ImpactStory, Mendeley, PlumX, Crossref Event Data) and explores the coverage of publications, social media and events from a longitudinal view. Disciplinary differences were also analysed. The results show that most of the studies are based on Altmetric.com data. This provider is the service that captures most mentions from social media sites, blogs and news outlets. PlumX has better coverage, counting more Mendeley readers, but capturing fewer events. CED has a special coverage of mentions from Wikipedia, while Lagotto and ImpactStory are becoming disused products because of their limited reach.<br />
<br />
== Full document ==<br />
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_899835105-77682-9376-document.pdf</pdf></div>Scipediacontent