Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 681010050 to Ojeda et al 2016a

2021-02-16T12:09:03Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 681010050 to Ojeda et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == This paper reviews five field assessments of the cathodic protection of coated steel pipelines buried in soils of an average resistivity of 4300 Ω cm, perfor..."

2021-02-16T12:08:56Z

Created page with " == Abstract == This paper reviews five field assessments of the cathodic protection of coated steel pipelines buried in soils of an average resistivity of 4300 Ω cm, perfor..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This paper reviews five field assessments of the cathodic protection of coated steel pipelines buried in soils of an average resistivity of 4300 Ω cm, performed using the close interval survey (CIS) technique and incorporating the instant off potential (IOP) method to measure any voltage drop. Multiple current sources were identified in the surveys, and simultaneous interruption of all the current sources was achieved using synchronised switches. The results presented here highlight the importance of incorporating the IOP method when performing CIS in order to quantify the voltage drop factor and thus improve the interpretation of potential measurements. Unexpected field situations encountered when performing the CIS technique are discussed and the practicality of using corrosion coupons is analysed.

The authors express their gratitude to Eng. C. K. Meier from Corrosion Control Inc., Rutledge, Ga, USA for the many discussions, and to CICYT, Spain (Project Nº DPI2011-26480) for financial support.

Peer Reviewed

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://hdl.handle.net/10261/143044 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/143044]

* [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743278215y.0000000041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743278215y.0000000041]

* [https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041 https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041],
: [https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/143044 https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/143044],
: [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000041],
: [http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/143044/1/accesoRestringido.pdf http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/143044/1/accesoRestringido.pdf],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1541633991 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1541633991]

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:09, 16 February 2021
(No difference)

Ojeda et al 2016a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 681010050 to Ojeda et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == This paper reviews five field assessments of the cathodic protection of coated steel pipelines buried in soils of an average resistivity of 4300 Ω cm, perfor..."