Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 460281671 to Nocera et al 2021a

2021-11-30T13:18:35Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 460281671 to Nocera et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This study explores the use of macro-modelling techniques based on smeared crack and damage-plastic constitutive laws for the cyclic in-plane analysis of maso..."

2021-11-30T13:18:32Z

Created page with "== Abstract == This study explores the use of macro-modelling techniques based on smeared crack and damage-plastic constitutive laws for the cyclic in-plane analysis of maso..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This study explores the use of macro-modelling techniques based on smeared crack
and damage-plastic constitutive laws for the cyclic in-plane analysis of masonry panels. The
numerical investigation is focused on two material macromechanical models, known as Total
Strain Cracking and Crack and Plasticity models. These show some limitations when analysing
the behaviour of masonry structures subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. A modified version of
the Drucker-Prager model including cohesive softening is introduced to overcome these
shortcomings.
A suite of numerical simulations is performed referring to an experimental campaign on two
masonry (squat and slender) panels. A comparison of distinctive features of flexural and shear
response of masonry panels is addressed. The results derived from the two FE macro-models
are compared with the experimental outcomes, highlighting the effects of geometry, stiffness
degradation, and post-peak energy dissipation. Furthermore, a comparison with another
macromechanical model is performed.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_460281671p915.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] G. Brandonisio, G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca, “Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 34, pp. 693–714, 2013.

[2] P. B. Lourenço, N. Mendes, L. F. Ramos, and D. V. Oliveira, “Analysis of Masonry Structures Without Box Behavior,” Int. J. Archit. Herit., vol. 5, no. 4–5, pp. 369–382, Jul. 2011.

[3] E. Sacco, D. Addessi, and K. Sab, “New trends in mechanics of masonry,” Meccanica, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1565–1569, 2018.

[4] P. Roca, M. Cervera, G. Gariup, and L. Pela’, “Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 299–325, Jul. 2010.

[5] D. Addessi and E. Sacco, “Nonlinear analysis of masonry panels using a kinematic enriched plane state formulation,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 90, pp. 194–214, 2016.

[6] P. B. Lourenço and J. G. Rots, “Multisurface Interface Model for Analysis of Masonry Structures,” J. Eng. Mech., vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 660–668, Jul. 1997.

[7] L. C. Silva, P. B. Lourenço, and G. Milani, “Derivation of the out-of-plane behaviour of masonry through homogenization strategies: micro-scale level,” Comput. Struct., vol. 209, pp. 30–43, 2018.

[8] L. Karapitta, H. Mouzakis, and P. Carydis, “Explicit finite‐element analysis for the in‐ plane cyclic behavior of unreinforced masonry structures,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 175–193, 2011.

[9] D. Addessi, “A 2D Cosserat finite element based on a damage-plastic model for brittle materials,” Comput. Struct., vol. 135, pp. 20–31, 2014.

[10] L. Pelà, M. Cervera, and P. Roca, “An orthotropic damage model for the analysis of masonry structures,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 41, pp. 957–967, Apr. 2013.

[11] L. C. Silva, P. B. Lourenço, and G. Milani, “A discrete macro-model using homogenization with strain-rate dependency for the out-of-plane study of masonry panels subjected to impact loading,” in ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017.

[12] L. C. Silva, N. Mendes, P. B. Lourenço, and J. Ingham, “Seismic Structural Assessment of the Christchurch Catholic Basilica, New Zealand,” Structures, vol. 15, pp. 115–130, 2018.

[13] C. Gatta, D. Addessi, and F. Vestroni, “Static and dynamic nonlinear response of masonry walls,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 155, pp. 291–303, 2018.

[14] L. Kachanov, “Rupture time under creep conditions,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 8, pp. 26–31, 1958.

[15] J. G. Rots, “Computational modeling of concrete fracture,” 1988.

[16] R. De Borst and P. Nauta, “Non-orthogonal cracks in a smeared finite element model,” Eng. Comput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 1985.

[17] J. G. Rots and J. Blaauwendraad, “Crack models for concrete: discrete or smeared? Fixed multi-directional or rotatin?,” Heron, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3–59, 1989.

[18] A. Anthoine, G. Magonette, and G. Magenes, “Shear-compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls,” in Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 1657–1662.

[19] DIANA, 2019, DIsplacement ANAlyzer finite element software package, version 10, DIANA FEA, Delft, https://dianafea.com. .

[20] C. Comi and U. Perego, “Fracture energy based bi-dissipative damage model for concrete,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 38, no. 36–37, pp. 6427–6454, 2001.

[21] G. Pijaudier-Cabot and Z. P. Bažant, “Nonlocal damage theory,” J. Eng. Mech., vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 1512–1533, 1987.

[22] G. Magenes and G. M. Calvi, “In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1091–1112, Nov. 1997.

[23] P. B. Lourenço, “Recent advances in masonry modelling: micromodelling and homogenisation,” in Multiscale modeling in solid mechanics: computational approaches, World Scientific, 2010, pp. 251–294.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:18, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

Nocera et al 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 460281671 to Nocera et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This study explores the use of macro-modelling techniques based on smeared crack and damage-plastic constitutive laws for the cyclic in-plane analysis of maso..."