Ningileri et al 2013a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 16:37, 25 January 2021

2021-01-25T16:37:19Z

Scipediacontent at 10:33, 22 January 2021

2021-01-22T10:33:30Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 475832812 to Ningileri et al 2013a

2020-10-26T09:32:46Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 475832812 to Ningileri et al 2013a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evalua..."

2020-10-26T09:32:44Z

Created page with " == Abstract == The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evalua..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evaluate the potential use of the existing steel pipeline infrastructure in high pressure gaseous hydrogen applications. The microstructures of four pipeline steels were characterized and tensile testing was conducted in gaseous hydrogen and helium at pressures of 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). Based on reduction of area, two of the four steels that performed the best across the pressure range were selected for evaluation of fracture and fatigue performance in gaseous hydrogen at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). The basic format for this phase of the study is as follows: Microstructural characterization of volume fraction of phases in each alloy; Tensile testing of all four alloys in He and H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi), and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). RA performance was used to choose the two best performers for further mechanical property evaluation; Fracture testing (ASTM E1820) of two best tensile test performers in H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi); Fatigue testing (ASTM E647) ofmoreÂ Â» two best tensile test performers in H2 at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi) with frequency =1.0 Hz and R-ratio=0.5 and 0.1.Â«Â le

Document type: Report

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_475832812-beopen220-8264-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1059020 http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1059020]

* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc837746/m2/1/high_res_d/1059020.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc837746/m2/1/high_res_d/1059020.pdf]

* [http://hydrogendoedev.nrel.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf http://hydrogendoedev.nrel.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf],[https://core.ac.uk/display/71262188 https://core.ac.uk/display/71262188],[http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf],[https://trid.trb.org/view/1249780 https://trid.trb.org/view/1249780],[https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1059020 https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1059020],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517336128 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517336128]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 25 January 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

−	The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evaluate the potential use of the existing steel pipeline infrastructure in high pressure gaseous hydrogen applications. The microstructures of four pipeline steels were characterized and tensile testing was conducted in gaseous hydrogen and helium at pressures of 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). Based on reduction of area, two of the four steels that performed the best across the pressure range were selected for evaluation of fracture and fatigue performance in gaseous hydrogen at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). The basic format for this phase of the study is as follows: Microstructural characterization of volume fraction of phases in each alloy; Tensile testing of all four alloys in He and H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi), and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). RA performance was used to choose the two best performers for further mechanical property evaluation; Fracture testing (ASTM E1820) of two best tensile test performers in H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi); Fatigue testing (ASTM E647) ~~ofmoreÂ Â»~~ two best tensile test performers in H2 at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi) with frequency =1.0 Hz and R-ratio=0.5 and 0.1.~~Â«Â le~~	+	The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evaluate the potential use of the existing steel pipeline infrastructure in high pressure gaseous hydrogen applications. The microstructures of four pipeline steels were characterized and tensile testing was conducted in gaseous hydrogen and helium at pressures of 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). Based on reduction of area, two of the four steels that performed the best across the pressure range were selected for evaluation of fracture and fatigue performance in gaseous hydrogen at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). The basic format for this phase of the study is as follows: Microstructural characterization of volume fraction of phases in each alloy; Tensile testing of all four alloys in He and H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi), and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). RA performance was used to choose the two best performers for further mechanical property evaluation; Fracture testing (ASTM E1820) of two best tensile test performers in H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi); Fatigue testing (ASTM E647) ofmore » two best tensile test performers in H2 at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi) with frequency =1.0 Hz and R-ratio=0.5 and 0.1.« le

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The main objective of the study is as follows: Identify steel compositions/microstructures suitable for construction of new pipeline infrastructure and evaluate the potential use of the existing steel pipeline infrastructure in high pressure gaseous hydrogen applications. The microstructures of four pipeline steels were characterized and tensile testing was conducted in gaseous hydrogen and helium at pressures of 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). Based on reduction of area, two of the four steels that performed the best across the pressure range were selected for evaluation of fracture and fatigue performance in gaseous hydrogen at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). The basic format for this phase of the study is as follows: Microstructural characterization of volume fraction of phases in each alloy; Tensile testing of all four alloys in He and H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi), 11 MPa (1600 psi), and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi). RA performance was used to choose the two best performers for further mechanical property evaluation; Fracture testing (ASTM E1820) of two best tensile test performers in H{sub 2} at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi); Fatigue testing (ASTM E647) ofmoreÂ Â» two best tensile test performers in H2 at 5.5 MPa (800 psi) and 20.7 MPa (3000 psi) with frequency =1.0 Hz and R-ratio=0.5 and 0.1.Â«Â le
@@ Line 18: / Line 13: @@
 * [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc837746/m2/1/high_res_d/1059020.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc837746/m2/1/high_res_d/1059020.pdf]
-* [http://hydrogendoedev.nrel.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf http://hydrogendoedev.nrel.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf],[https://core.ac.uk/display/71262188 https://core.ac.uk/display/71262188],[http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf],[https://trid.trb.org/view/1249780 https://trid.trb.org/view/1249780],[https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1059020 https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1059020],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517336128 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517336128]
+* [https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review11/pd047_stalheim_2011_p.pdf],

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:32, 26 October 2020
(No difference)