Navarre et al 2001a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 14:05, 21 January 2021

2021-01-21T14:05:20Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 206433549 to Navarre et al 2001a

2020-10-14T11:06:41Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 206433549 to Navarre et al 2001a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == This paper presents a set of tools supporting the development of interactive systems using two different notations. One of these notations, called ConcurTaskT..."

2020-10-14T11:06:38Z

Created page with " == Abstract == This paper presents a set of tools supporting the development of interactive systems using two different notations. One of these notations, called ConcurTaskT..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This paper presents a set of tools supporting the development of interactive systems using two different notations. One of these notations, called ConcurTaskTrees (CTT), is used for task modelling. The other notation, called Interactive Cooperative Objects (ICO), is used for system modelling. Even though these two kinds of models represent two different views of the same world (users interacting with interactive systems), they are built by different people and used independently. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of scenarios as a bridge between these two views. On the task modelling side, scenarios are seen as possible traces of activities, while on the system side, they are viewed as traces of actions. This generic approach is presented in a case study in the domain of Air Traffic Control.

Document type: Part of book or chapter of book

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_206433549-beopen288-1787-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6]

* [http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 21 January 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	This paper presents a set of tools supporting the development of interactive systems using two different notations. One of these notations, called ConcurTaskTrees (CTT), is used for task modelling. The other notation, called Interactive Cooperative Objects (ICO), is used for system modelling. Even though these two kinds of models represent two different views of the same world (users interacting with interactive systems), they are built by different people and used independently. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of scenarios as a bridge between these two views. On the task modelling side, scenarios are seen as possible traces of activities, while on the system side, they are viewed as traces of actions. This generic approach is presented in a case study in the domain of Air Traffic Control.		This paper presents a set of tools supporting the development of interactive systems using two different notations. One of these notations, called ConcurTaskTrees (CTT), is used for task modelling. The other notation, called Interactive Cooperative Objects (ICO), is used for system modelling. Even though these two kinds of models represent two different views of the same world (users interacting with interactive systems), they are built by different people and used independently. The aim of this paper is to propose the use of scenarios as a bridge between these two views. On the task modelling side, scenarios are seen as possible traces of activities, while on the system side, they are viewed as traces of actions. This generic approach is presented in a case study in the domain of Air Traffic Control.
−
−	~~Document type: Part of book or chapter of book~~
−
−	~~== Full document ==~~
−	~~<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_206433549-beopen288-1787-document.pdf</pdf>~~


Line 17:		Line 12:

	* [http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf]		* [http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf]
		+
		+	* [https://publications.cnr.it/doc/91403 https://publications.cnr.it/doc/91403]
		+
		+	* [http://hiis.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf http://hiis.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-A2-014.pdf],
		+	: [http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-a2-014.pdf http://giove.isti.cnr.it/attachments/publications/2001-a2-014.pdf],
		+	: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6],
		+	: [https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dsvis/dsvis2001.html#NavarrePPSB01 https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dsvis/dsvis2001.html#NavarrePPSB01],
		+	: [https://www.scipedia.com/public/Navarre_et_al_2001a https://www.scipedia.com/public/Navarre_et_al_2001a],
		+	: [https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6 https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6],
		+	: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517782647 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1517782647]
		+
		+	* [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6],
		+	: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45522-1_6] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:06, 14 October 2020
(No difference)