Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 470551981 to Mentrelli et al 2016a

2021-02-16T09:15:20Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 470551981 to Mentrelli et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == mong the modelling approaches that have been proposed for the simulation of wildfire propagation, two have gained considerable attention in recent years: the..."

2021-02-16T09:15:17Z

Created page with " == Abstract == mong the modelling approaches that have been proposed for the simulation of wildfire propagation, two have gained considerable attention in recent years: the..."

New page

== Abstract ==

mong the modelling approaches that have been proposed for the simulation of wildfire propagation, two have gained considerable attention in recent years: the one based on a reaction-diffusion equation, and the one based on the level set method. These two approaches, traditionally seen in competition, do actually lead to similar equation models when the level set method is modified taking into account random effects as those due to turbulent hot air transport and fire spotting phenomena. The connection between these two approaches is here discussed and the application of the modified level set method to test cases of practical interest is shown.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://bird.bcamath.org/bitstream/20.500.11824/189/1/Mentrelli-Pagnini.pdf http://bird.bcamath.org/bitstream/20.500.11824/189/1/Mentrelli-Pagnini.pdf] under the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1] under the license cc-by-nc-sa

* [http://hdl.handle.net/11585/551690 http://hdl.handle.net/11585/551690]

* [http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11824/189 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11824/189]

* [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1.pdf http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1.pdf],
: [http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1/fulltext.html http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1/fulltext.html],
: [http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1]

* [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11587-016-0272-1],
: [https://bird.bcamath.org/handle/20.500.11824/189 https://bird.bcamath.org/handle/20.500.11824/189],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2340007695 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2340007695] under the license http://www.springer.com/tdm

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:15, 16 February 2021
(No difference)

Mentrelli et al 2016a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 470551981 to Mentrelli et al 2016a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == mong the modelling approaches that have been proposed for the simulation of wildfire propagation, two have gained considerable attention in recent years: the..."