Marrero 1996a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 11:01, 22 January 2021

2021-01-22T11:01:45Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 140454070 to Marrero 1996a

2020-10-26T14:41:15Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 140454070 to Marrero 1996a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The main objective of this project was to conduct intensive research and development of the Coal Log Pipeline (CLP). Specifically, the R & D was to concentrat..."

2020-10-26T14:41:12Z

Created page with " == Abstract == The main objective of this project was to conduct intensive research and development of the Coal Log Pipeline (CLP). Specifically, the R & D was to concentrat..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The main objective of this project was to conduct intensive research and development of the Coal Log Pipeline (CLP). Specifically, the R & D was to concentrate on previously neglected and insufficiently studied aspects of CLP which were deemed significant. With improvements in these areas, CLP could be implemented for commercial use within five years. CLP technology is capable of transporting coal logs for long distances. The many potential advantages of CLP over truck and railroad transportation include: lower freight costs, less energy consumption, less air pollution, decreased environmental problems, increased safety, and improved reliability. Previous studies have shown that CLP is advantageous over slurry pipeline technology. First, CLP uses one-third the water required by a coal slurry pipeline. Second, CLP provides easier coal dewatering. Third, the CLP conveying capacity of coal is twice as much as a slurry transport line of equal diameter. In many situations, the cost for transporting each ton of coal is expected to be less expensive by CLP as compared to other competing modes of transportation such as: truck, unit train and slurry pipeline.

Document type: Report

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_140454070-beopen492-2800-document.pdf</pdf>

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/415346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/415346]

* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf]

* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf],[https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150],[https://core.ac.uk/display/71160635 https://core.ac.uk/display/71160635],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2016324521 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2016324521]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The main objective of this project was to conduct intensive research and development of the Coal Log Pipeline (CLP). Specifically, the R & D was to concentrate on previously neglected and insufficiently studied aspects of CLP which were deemed significant. With improvements in these areas, CLP could be implemented for commercial use within five years. CLP technology is capable of transporting coal logs for long distances. The many potential advantages of CLP over truck and railroad transportation include: lower freight costs, less energy consumption, less air pollution, decreased environmental problems, increased safety, and improved reliability. Previous studies have shown that CLP is advantageous over slurry pipeline technology. First, CLP uses one-third the water required by a coal slurry pipeline. Second, CLP provides easier coal dewatering. Third, the CLP conveying capacity of coal is twice as much as a slurry transport line of equal diameter. In many situations, the cost for transporting each ton of coal is expected to be less expensive by CLP as compared to other competing modes of transportation such as: truck, unit train and slurry pipeline.
@@ Line 18: / Line 13: @@
 * [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf]
-* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf],[https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150],[https://core.ac.uk/display/71160635 https://core.ac.uk/display/71160635],[https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2016324521 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2016324521]
+* [https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc674150/m2/1/high_res_d/415346.pdf],

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:41, 26 October 2020
(No difference)