https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Mahdi_et_al_2023a Mahdi et al 2023a - Revision history 2026-05-01T17:26:14Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Mahdi_et_al_2023a&diff=284305&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 584862867 to Mahdi et al 2023a 2023-10-03T09:22:47Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_584862867" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 584862867">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 584862867</a> to <a href="/public/Mahdi_et_al_2023a" title="Mahdi et al 2023a">Mahdi et al 2023a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:22, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Mahdi_et_al_2023a&diff=284252&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:16, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:16:29Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:16, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l4" >Line 4:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 4:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This study evaluates the flexural strength and ductility of one-way concrete slab panels reinforced with deformed bar and welded wire under the application of pure bending. An experimental database of flexural strength and ductility for a set of three slab panels reinforced with 10 mm deformed bar, three panels with 6 mm welded wire reinforcement (WWR), and three panels with 8 mm WWR has been developed, with each slab panel having a dimension of 762 mm by 2286 mm. The deflection and ductility factors of the specimens are investigated. The results show that the slab panels reinforced with 6 mm WWR exhibit less vertical deflection at fracture in comparison to those with 8 mm WWR. Welded wire reinforced slab panels demonstrated uniformly distributed crack propagation in comparison to deformed bars. In addition, the slab panels with 8 mm WWR exhibit higher flexural strength than the 6 mm WWR reinforced panels. The 10 mm deformed bar-reinforced slab panels exhibited greater deflection at fracture compared to WWR specimens. The reason for the lower ductile behavior of slab panels with 6 mm WWR is due to the fact that 6 mm WWR, produced locally in Bangladesh, is manufactured by the cold-drawn method and has a lower ductility in compliance with BDS ISO 6935</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This study evaluates the flexural strength and ductility of one-way concrete slab panels reinforced with deformed bar and welded wire under the application of pure bending. An experimental database of flexural strength and ductility for a set of three slab panels reinforced with 10 mm deformed bar, three panels with 6 mm welded wire reinforcement (WWR), and three panels with 8 mm WWR has been developed, with each slab panel having a dimension of 762 mm by 2286 mm. The deflection and ductility factors of the specimens are investigated. The results show that the slab panels reinforced with 6 mm WWR exhibit less vertical deflection at fracture in comparison to those with 8 mm WWR. Welded wire reinforced slab panels demonstrated uniformly distributed crack propagation in comparison to deformed bars. In addition, the slab panels with 8 mm WWR exhibit higher flexural strength than the 6 mm WWR reinforced panels. The 10 mm deformed bar-reinforced slab panels exhibited greater deflection at fracture compared to WWR specimens. The reason for the lower ductile behavior of slab panels with 6 mm WWR is due to the fact that 6 mm WWR, produced locally in Bangladesh, is manufactured by the cold-drawn method and has a lower ductility in compliance with BDS ISO 6935</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Class A, which does not conform to ASTM A1064. Both 8 mm WWR and 10 mm deformed bars conform to BDS ISO 6935 Class D and ASTM A1064. Hence, the 6 mm WWR with Class A ductility is not recommended for reinforced concrete (RC) slab panels based on the experimental results conducted in this study, whereas the 8 mm WWR and the 10 mm deformed bar with Class D ductility are suitable for structural use as recommended in ACI 318.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Class A, which does not conform to ASTM A1064. Both 8 mm WWR and 10 mm deformed bars conform to BDS ISO 6935 Class D and ASTM A1064. Hence, the 6 mm WWR with Class A ductility is not recommended for reinforced concrete (RC) slab panels based on the experimental results conducted in this study, whereas the 8 mm WWR and the 10 mm deformed bar with Class D ductility are suitable for structural use as recommended in ACI 318.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_58486286735.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284250:newid:284252 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Mahdi_et_al_2023a&diff=284250&oldid=prev JSanchez at 09:16, 3 October 2023 2023-10-03T09:16:27Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:16, 3 October 2023</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">This study evaluates the flexural strength and ductility of one-way concrete slab panels reinforced with deformed bar and welded wire under the application of pure bending. An experimental database of flexural strength and ductility for a set of three slab panels reinforced with 10 mm deformed bar, three panels with 6 mm welded wire reinforcement (WWR), and three panels with 8 mm WWR has been developed, with each slab panel having a dimension of 762 mm by 2286 mm. The deflection and ductility factors of the specimens are investigated. The results show that the slab panels reinforced with 6 mm WWR exhibit less vertical deflection at fracture in comparison to those with 8 mm WWR. Welded wire reinforced slab panels demonstrated uniformly distributed crack propagation in comparison to deformed bars. In addition, the slab panels with 8 mm WWR exhibit higher flexural strength than the 6 mm WWR reinforced panels. The 10 mm deformed bar-reinforced slab panels exhibited greater deflection at fracture compared to WWR specimens. The reason for the lower ductile behavior of slab panels with 6 mm WWR is due to the fact that 6 mm WWR, produced locally in Bangladesh, is manufactured by the cold-drawn method and has a lower ductility in compliance with BDS ISO 6935</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Class A, which does not conform to ASTM A1064. Both 8 mm WWR and 10 mm deformed bars conform to BDS ISO 6935 Class D and ASTM A1064. Hence, the 6 mm WWR with Class A ductility is not recommended for reinforced concrete (RC) slab panels based on the experimental results conducted in this study, whereas the 8 mm WWR and the 10 mm deformed bar with Class D ductility are suitable for structural use as recommended in ACI 318.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:284249:newid:284250 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Mahdi_et_al_2023a&diff=284249&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2023-10-03T09:16:25Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez