<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a</id>
		<title>Lucesoli et al 2021a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T13:48:10Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233155&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 824680040 to Lucesoli et al 2021a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233155&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:32:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_824680040&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 824680040&quot;&gt;Draft Content 824680040&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&quot; title=&quot;Lucesoli et al 2021a&quot;&gt;Lucesoli et al 2021a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 13:32, 30 November 2021&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233154&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  The resilience of historic areas is highly threatened by natural sudden onset events such as earthquakes. Major weak points of an urban environment, widely deb...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lucesoli_et_al_2021a&amp;diff=233154&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-11-30T13:31:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  The resilience of historic areas is highly threatened by natural sudden onset events such as earthquakes. Major weak points of an urban environment, widely deb...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resilience of historic areas is highly threatened by natural sudden onset events such as earthquakes. Major weak points of an urban environment, widely debated in the past literature, concern mainly masonry buildings. However, also the complex urban paths system could be prone to lose  its functionality in the  aftermath of a seismic  event.  Urban paths alterations due to earthquake effects can be attributed to extrinsic (i.e.: ruins formation from buildings) and intrinsic (e.g.: ground instability due to landslide or underground cavities) vulnerability; these factors jointly combined with exposure condition of hosted population in  urban  areas  and  with  the  local  seismic  hazard  represent  a  possible  impediment  to evacuation  process  and  at  the  same  time,  an  obstacle  to  rescuers’  teams  occupied  in offering  a  first  aid response.  Therefore,  the work  aim is to apply a tool for preliminary evaluation  of  risk,  strictly  related  to  urban  paths  system  considering  all  abovementioned aspects  from  a  holistic  point  of  view.  This  goal  is  achieved  by  a  simplified  methodology applicable to a wide-scale on a whole historic centre that takes advantages from a series of easy-to-detect  parameters  influencing  the  risk  with  limited  availability  of  resources. Parameters grouped by topics (i.e.: path use and exposure;  geometric  features;  physical-structural  features;  extrinsic  vulnerability;  seismic hazard)  are  assigned  to  scores  and weights  according  to  a  multi-criteria  decision-making process  generating  a  numerical index.  A  typical  Italian  urban centre  made  by  historical  masonry  constructions  is assumed as a case study to implement  the existing method. The detected risk indexes are then graphically provided through risk maps, a chromatic scale indicates which areas are more prone to possible unavailability of paths rather than others. Evacuation  planners  and emergency  managers  could  embody  this  tool  in  their  studies  to prevent the high number of losses by guiding evacuees toward assembly points through the risk lower  paths  and  to direct  risk-reduction  interventions  punctually  where  critical  condition  emerges  with different  priority  levels.  Paths  accessibility  evaluation  through  a  risk characterization could also result useful as a tool for rescuers’ activities optimization and for inhabitant disaster preparedness in terms of being familiar with safest and alternatives paths in emergency conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_824680040p641.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1]  S. Santarelli, G. Bernardini, E. Quagliarini, M. D’Orazio, New Indices for the Existing  City-Centers Streets Network Reliability and Availability Assessment in Earthquake Emergency, Int. J. Archit. Herit. december (2017) 1–16. doi:10.1080/15583058.2017.1328543.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2]  A. Zlateski, M. Lucesoli, G. Bernardini, T.M. Ferreira, Integrating human behaviour and building vulnerability for the assessment and mitigation of seismic risk in historic centres: Proposal of a holistic human-centred simulation-based approach, Int. J.  Disaster Risk Reduct. 43 (2019) 101392. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101392.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3]  P. Mouroux, B. Le Brun, Presentation of RISK-UE project, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4 (2006). doi:10.1007/s10518-006-9020-3.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4]  L. Xinpo, H. Siming, Seismically induced slope instabilities and the corresponding  treatments: The case of a road in the Wenchuan earthquake hit region, J. Mt. Sci. 6 (2009) 96–100. doi:10.1007/s11629-009-0197-1.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5]  G. Tesoriere, G. Marinella, M. Russello, Analisi della Vulnerabilità delle Reti Stradali in Aree Soggette a Rischio Sismico, in: XI S.I.I.V, 2001: p. 12.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6]  A. Cherubini, Progetto: SAVE - Strumenti Aggiornati per la Vulnerabilità sismica del patrimonio Edilizio e dei sistemi urbani, TASK 4 - Cap 2. (2003).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7]  E. Quagliarini, G. Bernardini, S. Santarelli, M. Lucesoli, Evacuation paths in historic city centres: A holistic methodology for assessing their seismic risk, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 31 (2018) 698–710. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.010.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8]  S. Lagomarsino, S. Giovinazzi, Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 4 (2006) 415–443. doi:10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[9]  T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, 1980. https://books.google.it/books?id=Xxi7AAAAIAAJ.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[10]  R. Ferlito, A.G. Pizza, A seismic vulnerability model for urban scenarios. Quick method for evaluation of roads vulnerability in emergency (Modello di vulnerabilità di un centro urbano. Metodologia per la valutazione speditiva della vulnerabilità della viabilità d’emergenza), Ing. Sismica. 4 (2011) 31–43.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[11]  Ordinanza Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, Opcm 3519 28/04/2006, (2006).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[12]  A. Martinelli, L. Corazza, Censimento di vulnerabilita degli edifici pubblici, strategici  e speciali nelle regioni Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia e Sicilia:valutazione della vulnerabilità degli edifici pubblici rilevati in 1510 comuni nelle regioni: Abruzz, Dipartimento della protezione civile, 1999.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[13]  E. Quagliarini, M. Lucesoli, G. Bernardini, Rapid tools for assessing building heritage’s seismic vulnerability: a preliminary reliability analysis, J. Cult. Herit. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.03.008.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[14]  Piantedosi Matteo, Circolare del 18 luglio 2018 - N. 11001/1/110/(10) Modelli organizzativi e procedurali per garantire alti livelli di sicurezza in occasione di manifestazioni pubbliche, (2018).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>