https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Lopez-Borrull_2018b 2026-04-30T18:46:36Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lopez-Borrull_2018b&diff=123290&oldid=prev 2019-04-02T07:13:29Z

<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_297354232" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 297354232">Draft Content 297354232</a> to <a href="/public/Lopez-Borrull_2018b" title="Lopez-Borrull 2018b">Lopez-Borrull 2018b</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 07:13, 2 April 2019</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

Scipediacontent https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lopez-Borrull_2018b&diff=123279&oldid=prev 2019-04-02T06:58:00Z

<p>Created page with &quot; == Resumen == Se describe la evolución de diversos repositorios temáticos aparecidos en 2017, así como alguna de las tendencias de futuro que se apuntan. Se discute el mo...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div><br /> == Resumen ==<br /> <br /> Se describe la evolución de diversos repositorios temáticos aparecidos en 2017, así como alguna de las tendencias de futuro que se apuntan. Se discute el momento actual de las megarrevistas, con énfasis en su viabilidad, modelo de negocio y estrategias de consolidación.<br /> <br /> == Texto completo ==<br /> &lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Content_297354232-64601-4235-document.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> == Referencias ==<br /> <br /> Binfield, Peter (2014). “Novel scholarly journal concepts”. En: Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (ed.). Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, pp. 155-163. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8 http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8<br /> <br /> Björk, Bo-Christer (2018). “Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017”, PeerJ 6: e4357. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4357<br /> <br /> Borrego, Ángel (2017), “Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099<br /> <br /> Davis, Phil (2017a). “Scientific reports overtakes PLOS One as largest megajournal”. The scholarly kitchen, 6 abril. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/04/06/scientific-reports-overtakes-plos-one-as-largest-megajournal<br /> <br /> Davis, Phil (2017b). “PLOS reports $1.7M loss In 2016”. The scholarly kitchen, 27 noviembre. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/11/27/plos-reports-2016-financial-loss<br /> <br /> Ellers, Jacintha; Crowther, Thomas W.; Harvey, Jeffrey A. (2017). “Gold open access publishing in mega-journals: Developing countries pay the price of western premium academic output” Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 89-102. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.1.89<br /> <br /> Hathcock, April (2017). “Open access week 2017: Launch of LIS scholarship archive”. At the intersection, 23 octubre. https://aprilhathcock.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/open-access-week-2017-launch-of-lis-scholarship-archive<br /> <br /> Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2012). “Física vs química: dos modelos de publicación científica”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 167-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.07<br /> <br /> Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2017). “Evolución de repositorios temáticos y megarrevistas: visión 2017”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 11, pp. 242-246. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.44<br /> <br /> Melero, Remedios (2018). “Evolució i nova generació dels repositoris”. Blok de BiD, 28 febrero. http://www.ub.edu/blokdebid/ca/node/850<br /> <br /> Shin, Eun-Ja (2017). “Can the growth of mega-journals affect authors’ choice of journal?”. Serials review, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1313092<br /> <br /> Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willet, Peter (2017). “Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082<br /> <br /> Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire; Willet, Peter (2018). “‘Let the community decide?’ The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals”. Journal of documentation, v. 74, n. 1, pp.137-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092<br /> <br /> Villatoro, Francisco (2018). “Scientific Reports ya es la mayor megarrevista científica superando a PLoS One”. La ciencia de la mula Francis, 19 febrero. http://francis.naukas.com/2018/02/19/scientific-reports-supera-a-plos-one-en-2017-siendo-la-mayor-megarrevista-cientifica/<br /> <br /> Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017a). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)”. Learned publishing, v. 30, pp. 301–311. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1117/epdf<br /> <br /> Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017b). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)”. Learned publishing , v. 30, pp. 313–322. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1118/epdf</div>

Scipediacontent