https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Lloret_1995aLloret 1995a - Revision history2026-05-13T01:12:44ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lloret_1995a&diff=107226&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 494404574 to Lloret 1995a2019-03-14T15:48:08Z<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_494404574" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 494404574">Draft Content 494404574</a> to <a href="/public/Lloret_1995a" title="Lloret 1995a">Lloret 1995a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:48, 14 March 2019</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Scipediacontenthttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Lloret_1995a&diff=107225&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Created page with " == Resum == The starting claim of this paper is that it is not accidental that in Catalan, as in Spanish, invariable nominals regarding number end in the same form as the re..."2019-03-14T15:48:06Z<p>Created page with " == Resum == The starting claim of this paper is that it is not accidental that in Catalan, as in Spanish, invariable nominals regarding number end in the same form as the re..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
== Resum ==<br />
<br />
The starting claim of this paper is that it is not accidental that in Catalan, as in Spanish, invariable nominals regarding number end in the same form as the regular plural marker, i.e., s, and thus any analysis willing to explain these words has to take this fact into account. Under this assumption, different proposals are evaluated: the existence of a `zero'-plural morph, the blocking of s (plural marker)-insertion, the deletion of s-plural marker, the ambimorphic interpretation of -s+s, the unspecified blocking of one of the two ss, and the deletion of the s-stem. The latter analysis is favoured, except for compounds whose second element is already plural, in which case the ambimorphic analysis is preferred.<br />
<br />
== Text complet ==<br />
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_494404574-7373-1262-document.pdf</pdf></div>Scipediacontent