<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a</id>
		<title>Kutnik et al 2020a - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T16:03:37Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=173023&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JSanchez at 12:46, 5 October 2020</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=173023&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2020-10-05T12:46:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 12:46, 5 October 2020&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot; &gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;. &lt;/del&gt;Most of European native wood species used outdoors are expected to last less than 10 years if left untreated and exposed to severe environmental conditions such as high humidity and biological agents. However, the current classification of wood’s natural durability based on EN standards does not fully reflect real end-use conditions, often underestimating wood’s performance in use. In addition, the importance of design details and the role they play in enhancing service life, especially in the case of outdoor applications, is often neglected. With the aim of evaluating the positive impact of proper design on wood’s service life, large-scale experimental devices, manufactured according to different designs (water draining / trapping) from six native wood species, were installed in 2009 in two French cities benefiting from different climatic conditions (oceanic / continental). The results of the evaluation carried out after 10 years of natural weathering demonstrated that (1) significant differences in the ability to withstand decay over time exist depending on the selected design details and the climatic conditions encountered in the experimental fields; (2) high variability in the resistance of non-durable spruce and poplar wood against fungal decay was noticed for each tested design, but with an unexpected high percentage of elements performing very well; (3) the moderately durable heartwood of larch, maritime pine and Douglas fir was mostly unaffected by decay even under severe conditions of exposure to rain (decking modules), suggesting these species may have greater value for outdoor applications without any preservative biocidal treatment than previously assumed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Most of European native wood species used outdoors are expected to last less than 10 years if left untreated and exposed to severe environmental conditions such as high humidity and biological agents. However, the current classification of wood’s natural durability based on EN standards does not fully reflect real end-use conditions, often underestimating wood’s performance in use. In addition, the importance of design details and the role they play in enhancing service life, especially in the case of outdoor applications, is often neglected. With the aim of evaluating the positive impact of proper design on wood’s service life, large-scale experimental devices, manufactured according to different designs (water draining / trapping) from six native wood species, were installed in 2009 in two French cities benefiting from different climatic conditions (oceanic / continental). The results of the evaluation carried out after 10 years of natural weathering demonstrated that (1) significant differences in the ability to withstand decay over time exist depending on the selected design details and the climatic conditions encountered in the experimental fields; (2) high variability in the resistance of non-durable spruce and poplar wood against fungal decay was noticed for each tested design, but with an unexpected high percentage of elements performing very well; (3) the moderately durable heartwood of larch, maritime pine and Douglas fir was mostly unaffected by decay even under severe conditions of exposure to rain (decking modules), suggesting these species may have greater value for outdoor applications without any preservative biocidal treatment than previously assumed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Full document ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Full document ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_804288415p813.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_804288415p813.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:171302:newid:173023 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JSanchez</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=171302&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 804288415 to Kutnik et al 2020a</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=171302&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2020-09-21T11:23:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scipediacontent moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Draft_Content_804288415&quot; class=&quot;mw-redirect&quot; title=&quot;Draft Content 804288415&quot;&gt;Draft Content 804288415&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/public/Kutnik_et_al_2020a&quot; title=&quot;Kutnik et al 2020a&quot;&gt;Kutnik et al 2020a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 11:23, 21 September 2020&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;mw-diff-empty&quot;&gt;(No difference)&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=171301&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Scipediacontent: Created page with &quot;== Abstract ==  . Most of European native wood species used outdoors are expected to last less than 10 years if left untreated and exposed to severe environmental conditions s...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kutnik_et_al_2020a&amp;diff=171301&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2020-09-21T11:23:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Abstract ==  . Most of European native wood species used outdoors are expected to last less than 10 years if left untreated and exposed to severe environmental conditions s...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
. Most of European native wood species used outdoors are expected to last less than 10 years if left untreated and exposed to severe environmental conditions such as high humidity and biological agents. However, the current classification of wood’s natural durability based on EN standards does not fully reflect real end-use conditions, often underestimating wood’s performance in use. In addition, the importance of design details and the role they play in enhancing service life, especially in the case of outdoor applications, is often neglected. With the aim of evaluating the positive impact of proper design on wood’s service life, large-scale experimental devices, manufactured according to different designs (water draining / trapping) from six native wood species, were installed in 2009 in two French cities benefiting from different climatic conditions (oceanic / continental). The results of the evaluation carried out after 10 years of natural weathering demonstrated that (1) significant differences in the ability to withstand decay over time exist depending on the selected design details and the climatic conditions encountered in the experimental fields; (2) high variability in the resistance of non-durable spruce and poplar wood against fungal decay was noticed for each tested design, but with an unexpected high percentage of elements performing very well; (3) the moderately durable heartwood of larch, maritime pine and Douglas fir was mostly unaffected by decay even under severe conditions of exposure to rain (decking modules), suggesting these species may have greater value for outdoor applications without any preservative biocidal treatment than previously assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full document ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pdf&amp;gt;Media:Draft_Content_804288415p813.pdf&amp;lt;/pdf&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scipediacontent</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>