https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Kumar%2A_Prashant_2024a Kumar* Prashant 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-08T11:00:26Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kumar*_Prashant_2024a&diff=302369&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 718810688 to Kumar* Prashant 2024a 2024-06-10T08:50:25Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_718810688" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 718810688">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 718810688</a> to <a href="/public/Kumar*_Prashant_2024a" title="Kumar* Prashant 2024a">Kumar* Prashant 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:50, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kumar*_Prashant_2024a&diff=302368&oldid=prev JSanchez at 08:50, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T08:50:20Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:50, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Geosynthetics-reinforced soil (GRS) walls have gained immense popularity among other reinforced soil walls. In recent times, case studies have highlighted several GRS walls facing problems such as cracking on the facia, breakage of connection pins in the segmental block, breakage of connection between facia and reinforcement, and relative settlement between facia and backfill, all leading to the serviceability issues or failure of the wall. The existing design methods estimate connection loads using laboratory pull-out tests, which do not incorporate the effect of on-site conditions, such as differential settlement, compaction-induced stresses, and facia geometry, and the stress mobilization in the connection system. This study examines the stress distribution in the facia connection system of segmental reinforced soil walls subjected to site conditions such as inadequate backfill compaction and differential settlement between facia and backfill. A finite element (FE) approach has been adopted to predict the stresses in the reinforcement for the connection loads in the reinforcement-facia connection system subjected to the above-mentioned conditions. The modular block facia, along with geogrid reinforcement connections, was studied, incorporating appropriate geometrical and interface properties (viz. geosynthetics-block interfaces). Based on the study, the obtained variation in the von Mises stresses in the geogrid, embedded in the modular block, due to connection load at the service state was analysed. A comparative analysis of the performance of three different segmental block facia-reinforcement connections was also performed to understand their suitability in a particular site condition</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Geosynthetics-reinforced soil (GRS) walls have gained immense popularity among other reinforced soil walls. In recent times, case studies have highlighted several GRS walls facing problems such as cracking on the facia, breakage of connection pins in the segmental block, breakage of connection between facia and reinforcement, and relative settlement between facia and backfill, all leading to the serviceability issues or failure of the wall. The existing design methods estimate connection loads using laboratory pull-out tests, which do not incorporate the effect of on-site conditions, such as differential settlement, compaction-induced stresses, and facia geometry, and the stress mobilization in the connection system. This study examines the stress distribution in the facia connection system of segmental reinforced soil walls subjected to site conditions such as inadequate backfill compaction and differential settlement between facia and backfill. A finite element (FE) approach has been adopted to predict the stresses in the reinforcement for the connection loads in the reinforcement-facia connection system subjected to the above-mentioned conditions. The modular block facia, along with geogrid reinforcement connections, was studied, incorporating appropriate geometrical and interface properties (viz. geosynthetics-block interfaces). Based on the study, the obtained variation in the von Mises stresses in the geogrid, embedded in the modular block, due to connection load at the service state was analysed. A comparative analysis of the performance of three different segmental block facia-reinforcement connections was also performed to understand their suitability in a particular site condition</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_71881068889.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302366:newid:302368 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kumar*_Prashant_2024a&diff=302366&oldid=prev JSanchez at 08:50, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T08:50:19Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:50, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Geosynthetics-reinforced soil (GRS) walls have gained immense popularity among other reinforced soil walls. In recent times, case studies have highlighted several GRS walls facing problems such as cracking on the facia, breakage of connection pins in the segmental block, breakage of connection between facia and reinforcement, and relative settlement between facia and backfill, all leading to the serviceability issues or failure of the wall. The existing design methods estimate connection loads using laboratory pull-out tests, which do not incorporate the effect of on-site conditions, such as differential settlement, compaction-induced stresses, and facia geometry, and the stress mobilization in the connection system. This study examines the stress distribution in the facia connection system of segmental reinforced soil walls subjected to site conditions such as inadequate backfill compaction and differential settlement between facia and backfill. A finite element (FE) approach has been adopted to predict the stresses in the reinforcement for the connection loads in the reinforcement-facia connection system subjected to the above-mentioned conditions. The modular block facia, along with geogrid reinforcement connections, was studied, incorporating appropriate geometrical and interface properties (viz. geosynthetics-block interfaces). Based on the study, the obtained variation in the von Mises stresses in the geogrid, embedded in the modular block, due to connection load at the service state was analysed. A comparative analysis of the performance of three different segmental block facia-reinforcement connections was also performed to understand their suitability in a particular site condition</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302365:newid:302366 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kumar*_Prashant_2024a&diff=302365&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-10T08:50:17Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez