https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Kousha_Thelwall_2015aKousha Thelwall 2015a - Revision history2026-04-17T04:53:22ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kousha_Thelwall_2015a&diff=128327&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 334600463 to Kousha Thelwall 2015a2019-04-08T12:52:17Z<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_334600463" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 334600463">Draft Content 334600463</a> to <a href="/public/Kousha_Thelwall_2015a" title="Kousha Thelwall 2015a">Kousha Thelwall 2015a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:52, 8 April 2019</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Scipediacontenthttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Kousha_Thelwall_2015a&diff=128326&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == This literature review describes web indicators for the impact of books, software, datasets, videos and other non-standard academic outputs. Although journal..."2019-04-08T12:52:14Z<p>Created page with " == Abstract == This literature review describes web indicators for the impact of books, software, datasets, videos and other non-standard academic outputs. Although journal..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
== Abstract ==<br />
<br />
This literature review describes web indicators for the impact of books, software, datasets, videos and other non-standard academic outputs. Although journal articles dominate academic research in the health and natural sciences, other types of outputs can make equally valuable contributions to scholarship and are more common in other fields. It is not always possible to get useful citation-based impact indicators for these due to their absence from, or incomplete coverage in, traditional citation indexes. In this context, the web is particularly valuable as a potential source of impact indicators for non-standard academic outputs. The main focus in this review is on books because of the much greater amount of relevant research for them and because they are regarded as particularly valuable in the arts and humanities and in some areas of the social sciences.<br />
<br />
== Full document ==<br />
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_334600463-41695-6596-document.pdf</pdf></div>Scipediacontent