https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Hyder%2A_Moug_2024a 2026-05-05T14:47:12Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hyder*_Moug_2024a&diff=302524&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:19:01Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_435002933" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 435002933">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 435002933</a> to <a href="/public/Hyder*_Moug_2024a" title="Hyder* Moug 2024a">Hyder* Moug 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:19, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hyder*_Moug_2024a&diff=302523&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:18:56Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:18, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The cone penetration test (CPT) is used to characterize the behaviour and properties of soils, including the cyclic strength against earthquake liquefaction triggering. The cone tip resistance relates to cyclic strength through relative density, where relative density is closely related to both cone tip resistance and liquefaction susceptibility. Currently, published methods of estimating liquefaction potential (i.e., cyclic resistance ratio) are based on silica sands and do not properly characterize calcareous sands. The measured cone tip resistance in calcareous sands is lower than in silica sands at the same relative density; this difference is generally attributed to the higher compressibility of calcareous sands due to particle crushing during cone penetration. Consequently, application of CPT-based liquefaction triggering evaluations in calcareous sands result in over-conservative analysis. To avoid over-conservative analysis, projects may develop site-specific correction factors to adjust the cone tip resistance in calcareous sand to the equivalent value in silica sand at the equivalent relative density. This study aims to investigate cone penetration in calcareous sands compared to silica sands by examining the roles of soil compressibility and other fundamental soil parameters. The study is performed with a direct axisymmetric penetration model and the MIT-S1 constitutive model calibrated against published mechanical behaviour for a calcareous sand; the simulated cone penetration results are compared with simulated cone penetration in Ottawa F-65 sand. Compressibility of the calibrations is adjusted to explore the role of compressibility on cone tip resistance. The numerical results show that differences in compressibility only partially account for differences in cone tip resistance between calcareous and silica sands at the same initial state. However, the results support that critical state line position does strongly relate to differences in cone tip resistance between the two soil types. The study results provide a basis to investigate differences in critical state line position as a basis for site-specific cone tip resistance correction factors for calcareous soils.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The cone penetration test (CPT) is used to characterize the behaviour and properties of soils, including the cyclic strength against earthquake liquefaction triggering. The cone tip resistance relates to cyclic strength through relative density, where relative density is closely related to both cone tip resistance and liquefaction susceptibility. Currently, published methods of estimating liquefaction potential (i.e., cyclic resistance ratio) are based on silica sands and do not properly characterize calcareous sands. The measured cone tip resistance in calcareous sands is lower than in silica sands at the same relative density; this difference is generally attributed to the higher compressibility of calcareous sands due to particle crushing during cone penetration. Consequently, application of CPT-based liquefaction triggering evaluations in calcareous sands result in over-conservative analysis. To avoid over-conservative analysis, projects may develop site-specific correction factors to adjust the cone tip resistance in calcareous sand to the equivalent value in silica sand at the equivalent relative density. This study aims to investigate cone penetration in calcareous sands compared to silica sands by examining the roles of soil compressibility and other fundamental soil parameters. The study is performed with a direct axisymmetric penetration model and the MIT-S1 constitutive model calibrated against published mechanical behaviour for a calcareous sand; the simulated cone penetration results are compared with simulated cone penetration in Ottawa F-65 sand. Compressibility of the calibrations is adjusted to explore the role of compressibility on cone tip resistance. The numerical results show that differences in compressibility only partially account for differences in cone tip resistance between calcareous and silica sands at the same initial state. However, the results support that critical state line position does strongly relate to differences in cone tip resistance between the two soil types. The study results provide a basis to investigate differences in critical state line position as a basis for site-specific cone tip resistance correction factors for calcareous soils.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_43500293378.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302521:newid:302523 --> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hyder*_Moug_2024a&diff=302521&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:18:54Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:18, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The cone penetration test (CPT) is used to characterize the behaviour and properties of soils, including the cyclic strength against earthquake liquefaction triggering. The cone tip resistance relates to cyclic strength through relative density, where relative density is closely related to both cone tip resistance and liquefaction susceptibility. Currently, published methods of estimating liquefaction potential (i.e., cyclic resistance ratio) are based on silica sands and do not properly characterize calcareous sands. The measured cone tip resistance in calcareous sands is lower than in silica sands at the same relative density; this difference is generally attributed to the higher compressibility of calcareous sands due to particle crushing during cone penetration. Consequently, application of CPT-based liquefaction triggering evaluations in calcareous sands result in over-conservative analysis. To avoid over-conservative analysis, projects may develop site-specific correction factors to adjust the cone tip resistance in calcareous sand to the equivalent value in silica sand at the equivalent relative density. This study aims to investigate cone penetration in calcareous sands compared to silica sands by examining the roles of soil compressibility and other fundamental soil parameters. The study is performed with a direct axisymmetric penetration model and the MIT-S1 constitutive model calibrated against published mechanical behaviour for a calcareous sand; the simulated cone penetration results are compared with simulated cone penetration in Ottawa F-65 sand. Compressibility of the calibrations is adjusted to explore the role of compressibility on cone tip resistance. The numerical results show that differences in compressibility only partially account for differences in cone tip resistance between calcareous and silica sands at the same initial state. However, the results support that critical state line position does strongly relate to differences in cone tip resistance between the two soil types. The study results provide a basis to investigate differences in critical state line position as a basis for site-specific cone tip resistance correction factors for calcareous soils.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hyder*_Moug_2024a&diff=302520&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:18:53Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez