https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Hubert_Cobanli_2014aHubert Cobanli 2014a - Revision history2026-04-23T15:05:04ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hubert_Cobanli_2014a&diff=194942&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 759432396 to Hubert Cobanli 2014a2021-01-28T21:58:19Z<p>Scipediacontent moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Content_759432396" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Content 759432396">Draft Content 759432396</a> to <a href="/public/Hubert_Cobanli_2014a" title="Hubert Cobanli 2014a">Hubert Cobanli 2014a</a></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:58, 28 January 2021</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Scipediacontenthttps://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Hubert_Cobanli_2014a&diff=194941&oldid=prevScipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == We analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian network for natural gas. Two pipelines, “Nord Stream..."2021-01-28T21:58:12Z<p>Created page with " == Abstract == We analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian network for natural gas. Two pipelines, “Nord Stream..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div><br />
== Abstract ==<br />
<br />
We analyze the impact of three controversial pipeline projects on the power structure in the Eurasian network for natural gas. Two pipelines, “Nord Stream” and “South Stream,” allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. The third project, “Nabucco,” aims at diversifying Europe’s gas imports by accessing producers in Middle East and Central Asia. If network power is measured with the Shapley Value we obtain a clear ranking of the projects which corresponds to the observed investment patterns. Nord Stream’s strategic value is huge, easily justifying the high investment cost for Germany and Russia. The additional leverage obtained through South Stream is much smaller and Nabucco is not viable. For the nucleolus in contrast, none of the pipelines has any strategic relevance at all, which contradicts the empirical evidence on investment.<br />
<br />
<br />
== Original document ==<br />
<br />
The different versions of the original document can be found in:<br />
<br />
* [http://hdl.handle.net/10419/100596 http://hdl.handle.net/10419/100596]<br />
<br />
* [https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/100596/1/VfS_2014_pid_676.pdf https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/100596/1/VfS_2014_pid_676.pdf]<br />
<br />
* [http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2015.14.issue-2/rne-2016-0011/rne-2016-0011.xml http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2015.14.issue-2/rne-2016-0011/rne-2016-0011.xml],<br />
: [https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2015.14.issue-2/rne-2016-0011/rne-2016-0011.pdf https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2015.14.issue-2/rne-2016-0011/rne-2016-0011.pdf],<br />
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0011]<br />
<br />
* [https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rneart/v14y2015i2p75-110n3.html https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rneart/v14y2015i2p75-110n3.html],<br />
: [https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100596 https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100596],<br />
: [http://www.ms-hns.de/files/publications/pipeline-power-2014.pdf http://www.ms-hns.de/files/publications/pipeline-power-2014.pdf],<br />
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2276891205 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2276891205]</div>Scipediacontent