Hua et al 2017a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 14:16, 9 January 2018

2018-01-09T14:16:49Z

2017-09-20T08:20:19Z

2017-09-19T13:59:02Z

2017-09-19T13:58:40Z

2017-09-19T12:31:40Z

2017-09-19T12:29:17Z

2017-09-15T13:22:23Z

2017-09-15T13:17:38Z

2017-09-15T13:16:03Z

2017-09-15T13:05:01Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Department of Engineering Mechanics<br />
 Northwestern Polytechnical University<br />
 China
+-->
-−
 ==Abstract==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Department of Engineering Mechanics
+Department of Engineering Mechanics<br />
-Northwestern Polytechnical University
+Northwestern Polytechnical University<br />
 China

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 19 September 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Department of Engineering Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China	+	Department of Engineering Mechanics
		+	Northwestern Polytechnical University
		+	China

@@ Line 296: / Line 296: @@
 <div class="center" style="font-size: 75%;">'''Table 2'''. V of structural response signals</div>
-{| style="text-align: right;width: auto;font-size:85%"
+{| style="margin: 1em auto 0.1em auto;border-collapse: collapse;width: auto;font-size:85%"
 |-
 |  style="border-left: 1pt solid black;border-top: 1pt solid black;border-right: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;width:30px;"|

@@ Line 320: / Line 320: @@
 ==References==
 [1] X.J. Dang, Statistic strategy of damage detection for composite structure using the correlation function amplitude vector. Procedia Engineering, 99(2015)1395–1406.
@@ Line 364: / Line 365: @@
 [22] K. Masayuki, M. Koji, Monitoring of inside surface crack growth by strain measurement of the outside surface: A feasibility study. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241(2011)1–11.

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:20, 20 September 2017
(No difference)

@@ Line 191: / Line 191: @@
 </div>
-{| style="width: 100%;border-collapse: collapse;font-size:85%;text-align: center;"
+{| style="border-collapse: collapse;font-size:85%;text-align: center;width: 100%;"
 |-
 |  style="border-left: 1pt solid black;border-top: 1pt solid black;border-right: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;"| <math>{E}_{XX}</math>
@@ Line 296: / Line 296: @@
 <div class="center" style="font-size: 75%;">'''Table 2'''. V of structural response signals</div>
-{| style="text-align: center;width: auto;border-collapse: collapse;font-size:85%"
+{| style="text-align: center;width: auto;font-size:85%"
 |-
 |  style="border-left: 1pt solid black;border-top: 1pt solid black;border-right: 1pt solid black;text-align: center;width:30px;"|

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 15 September 2017
Line 293:		Line 293:

	Based on Eq. (10), the change of signal energy can be obtained as 6.63%. Since <math display="inline">V</math> of sensor 4 signal is greater than 0, structural damage has occurred. However, the location of damage has not been captured yet. <math display="inline">V</math> of structural signals are shown in Table 2. From comparing the change of signal energy, <math display="inline">V</math> of sensor 3 signal is bigger which means that the structural damage is more likely to happen around this sensor. The damage detection results are in consistent with the pre-defined damage condition.		Based on Eq. (10), the change of signal energy can be obtained as 6.63%. Since <math display="inline">V</math> of sensor 4 signal is greater than 0, structural damage has occurred. However, the location of damage has not been captured yet. <math display="inline">V</math> of structural signals are shown in Table 2. From comparing the change of signal energy, <math display="inline">V</math> of sensor 3 signal is bigger which means that the structural damage is more likely to happen around this sensor. The damage detection results are in consistent with the pre-defined damage condition.
−
−	~~==kk==~~

	<div class="center" style="font-size: 75%;">'''Table 2'''. V of structural response signals</div>		<div class="center" style="font-size: 75%;">'''Table 2'''. V of structural response signals</div>