Henriksson 2014a - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 13:05, 26 January 2021

2021-01-26T13:05:00Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 322350890 to Henriksson 2014a

2021-01-21T13:15:46Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 322350890 to Henriksson 2014a

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == Minskning av transporters negativa miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan, eller en Ã¶kning av hÃ¥llbara resor, har blivit en allt viktigare frÃ¥ga fÃ¶r lokala aktÃ¶re..."

2021-01-21T13:15:43Z

Created page with " == Abstract == Minskning av transporters negativa miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan, eller en Ã¶kning av hÃ¥llbara resor, har blivit en allt viktigare frÃ¥ga fÃ¶r lokala aktÃ¶re..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Minskning av transporters negativa miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan, eller en Ã¶kning av hÃ¥llbara resor, har blivit en allt viktigare frÃ¥ga fÃ¶r lokala aktÃ¶rer. Genom samhÃ¤lls- och trafikplanering ska dagens ohÃ¥llbara transportsystem bli mer hÃ¥llbart. Det gÃ¶r hur planerare i Helsingborg planerar fÃ¶r hÃ¥llbara resor intressant att studera. Avhandlingen undersÃ¶ker hur planerare fÃ¶restÃ¤ller sig vad hÃ¥llbart resande Ã¤r, vilka resenÃ¤rer det Ã¤r som bÃ¶r resa mer hÃ¥llbart samt hur en hÃ¥llbar stad kan se ut. Teoretiskt kombinerar avhandlingen ett intersektionellt ramverk med feministisk planeringsteori samt teorier frÃ¥n STS (teknik- och vetenskapsstudier). Det empiriska materialet bestÃ¥r av djupintervjuer med sexton planerare, en fokusgruppsintervju samt bildanalys av de planeringsdokument som Helsingborgs stad anvÃ¤nder sig av i planeringen fÃ¶r hÃ¥llbara resor. FramfÃ¶rallt visar avhandlingen att planerare inte betraktar resors negativa miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan som ett argument som kan fÃ¥ mÃ¤nniskor att resa mer hÃ¥llbart. IstÃ¤llet Ã¤r det mÃ¶jligheten att framstÃ¤lla hÃ¥llbara resor som roliga, hÃ¤lsosamma, lustfyllda och praktiska som planerare tror kan fÃ¥ helsingborgarna att cykla eller Ã¥ka mer buss. Men det Ã¤r bara vissa resenÃ¤rer som antas kunna ta del av de hÃ¥llbara resornas positiva vÃ¤rden. Planerarnas fÃ¶restÃ¤llningar om bland annat kÃ¶n, etnicitet och klass Ã¤r avgÃ¶rande fÃ¶r hur de fÃ¶rstÃ¥r hÃ¥llbara resor. Planerarna menar sammanfattningsvis att det Ã¤r stort att resa rÃ¤tt av miljÃ¶skÃ¤l, men stÃ¶rre att fritt vÃ¤lja det mest attraktiva fÃ¤rdsÃ¤ttet. Demands for sustainable mobility have become an increasingly important issue for local actors. Through city and traffic planning, the current unsustainable transport systems are going to become more sustainable. However, how to define sustainable mobility is disputed. Therefore, how planners in the Swedish municipality of Helsingborg define sustainable mobility makes an interesting case. This thesis examines how planners imagine sustainable mobility, who the sustainable traveler is, and what a sustainable city might look like. Theoretically the thesis combines an intersectional framework with a feminist planning theory and theories from Science and Technology Studies. The empirical material is based on in-depth interviews with sixteen planners, a focus group interview, and visual analyses of the planning documents the city of Helsingborg uses in planning for sustainable mobility. The analyses show that planners do not see the negative environmental impact of traveling as an argument which will persuade people to travel more sustainably. Instead, it is the possibility to construct sustainable mobility as fun, healthy, pleasurable, and practical that planners believe will persuade the inhabitants of Helsingborg to cycle or travel by bus more often. But not all travelers are likely to benefit from the positive values of sustainable mobility. To conclude, when planners imagine sustainable mobility, they imagine that it is good to travel the correct way for environmental reasons, but it is even greater to make independent travel choices, based on what modes of transport attract the most people. <p>I denna elektroniska version av avhandlingen Ã¤r bilderna i bilaga 2 uteslutna pÃ¥ grund av upphovsrÃ¤ttsliga skÃ¤l.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02 http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02]

* [http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102742 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102742]

* [http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02.pdf http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02.pdf],
: [http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-102742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-102742]

* [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:681485 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:681485],
: [https://trid.trb.org/view/1367705 https://trid.trb.org/view/1367705],
: [http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:681485 http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:681485],
: [http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02 http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02],
: [http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02 http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:681485/FULLTEXT02],
: [http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102742 http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102742],
: [https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1950639798 https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1950639798]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 26 January 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Abstract ==		== Abstract ==

−	Minskning av transporters negativa ~~miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan~~, eller en ~~Ã¶kning~~ av ~~hÃ¥llbara~~ resor, har blivit en allt viktigare ~~frÃ¥ga fÃ¶r~~ lokala ~~aktÃ¶rer~~. Genom ~~samhÃ¤lls~~- och trafikplanering ska dagens ~~ohÃ¥llbara~~ transportsystem bli mer ~~hÃ¥llbart~~. Det ~~gÃ¶r~~ hur planerare i Helsingborg planerar ~~fÃ¶r hÃ¥llbara~~ resor intressant att studera. Avhandlingen ~~undersÃ¶ker~~ hur planerare ~~fÃ¶restÃ¤ller~~ sig vad ~~hÃ¥llbart~~ resande ~~Ã¤r~~, vilka ~~resenÃ¤rer~~ det ~~Ã¤r~~ som ~~bÃ¶r~~ resa mer ~~hÃ¥llbart~~ samt hur en ~~hÃ¥llbar~~ stad kan se ut. Teoretiskt kombinerar avhandlingen ett intersektionellt ramverk med feministisk planeringsteori samt teorier ~~frÃ¥n~~ STS (teknik- och vetenskapsstudier). Det empiriska materialet ~~bestÃ¥r~~ av djupintervjuer med sexton planerare, en fokusgruppsintervju samt bildanalys av de planeringsdokument som Helsingborgs stad ~~anvÃ¤nder~~ sig av i planeringen ~~fÃ¶r hÃ¥llbara~~ resor. ~~FramfÃ¶rallt~~ visar avhandlingen att planerare inte betraktar resors negativa ~~miljÃ¶pÃ¥verkan~~ som ett argument som kan ~~fÃ¥ mÃ¤nniskor~~ att resa mer ~~hÃ¥llbart~~. ~~IstÃ¤llet Ã¤r~~ det ~~mÃ¶jligheten~~ att ~~framstÃ¤lla hÃ¥llbara~~ resor som roliga, ~~hÃ¤lsosamma~~, lustfyllda och praktiska som planerare tror kan ~~fÃ¥~~ helsingborgarna att cykla eller ~~Ã¥ka~~ mer buss. Men det ~~Ã¤r~~ bara vissa ~~resenÃ¤rer~~ som antas kunna ta del av de ~~hÃ¥llbara~~ resornas positiva ~~vÃ¤rden~~. Planerarnas ~~fÃ¶restÃ¤llningar~~ om bland annat ~~kÃ¶n~~, etnicitet och klass ~~Ã¤r avgÃ¶rande fÃ¶r~~ hur de ~~fÃ¶rstÃ¥r hÃ¥llbara~~ resor. Planerarna menar sammanfattningsvis att det ~~Ã¤r~~ stort att resa ~~rÃ¤tt~~ av ~~miljÃ¶skÃ¤l~~, men ~~stÃ¶rre~~ att fritt ~~vÃ¤lja~~ det mest attraktiva ~~fÃ¤rdsÃ¤ttet~~. Demands for sustainable mobility have become an increasingly important issue for local actors. Through city and traffic planning, the current unsustainable transport systems are going to become more sustainable. However, how to define sustainable mobility is disputed. Therefore, how planners in the Swedish municipality of Helsingborg define sustainable mobility makes an interesting case. This thesis examines how planners imagine sustainable mobility, who the sustainable traveler is, and what a sustainable city might look like. Theoretically the thesis combines an intersectional framework with a feminist planning theory and theories from Science and Technology Studies. The empirical material is based on in-depth interviews with sixteen planners, a focus group interview, and visual analyses of the planning documents the city of Helsingborg uses in planning for sustainable mobility. The analyses show that planners do not see the negative environmental impact of traveling as an argument which will persuade people to travel more sustainably. Instead, it is the possibility to construct sustainable mobility as fun, healthy, pleasurable, and practical that planners believe will persuade the inhabitants of Helsingborg to cycle or travel by bus more often. But not all travelers are likely to benefit from the positive values of sustainable mobility. To conclude, when planners imagine sustainable mobility, they imagine that it is good to travel the correct way for environmental reasons, but it is even greater to make independent travel choices, based on what modes of transport attract the most people. <p>I denna elektroniska version av avhandlingen ~~Ã¤r~~ bilderna i bilaga 2 uteslutna ~~pÃ¥~~ grund av ~~upphovsrÃ¤ttsliga skÃ¤l~~.	+	Minskning av transporters negativa miljöpåverkan, eller en ökning av hållbara resor, har blivit en allt viktigare fråga för lokala aktörer. Genom samhälls- och trafikplanering ska dagens ohållbara transportsystem bli mer hållbart. Det gör hur planerare i Helsingborg planerar för hållbara resor intressant att studera. Avhandlingen undersöker hur planerare föreställer sig vad hållbart resande är, vilka resenärer det är som bör resa mer hållbart samt hur en hållbar stad kan se ut. Teoretiskt kombinerar avhandlingen ett intersektionellt ramverk med feministisk planeringsteori samt teorier från STS (teknik- och vetenskapsstudier). Det empiriska materialet består av djupintervjuer med sexton planerare, en fokusgruppsintervju samt bildanalys av de planeringsdokument som Helsingborgs stad använder sig av i planeringen för hållbara resor. Framförallt visar avhandlingen att planerare inte betraktar resors negativa miljöpåverkan som ett argument som kan få människor att resa mer hållbart. Istället är det möjligheten att framställa hållbara resor som roliga, hälsosamma, lustfyllda och praktiska som planerare tror kan få helsingborgarna att cykla eller åka mer buss. Men det är bara vissa resenärer som antas kunna ta del av de hållbara resornas positiva värden. Planerarnas föreställningar om bland annat kön, etnicitet och klass är avgörande för hur de förstår hållbara resor. Planerarna menar sammanfattningsvis att det är stort att resa rätt av miljöskäl, men större att fritt välja det mest attraktiva färdsättet. Demands for sustainable mobility have become an increasingly important issue for local actors. Through city and traffic planning, the current unsustainable transport systems are going to become more sustainable. However, how to define sustainable mobility is disputed. Therefore, how planners in the Swedish municipality of Helsingborg define sustainable mobility makes an interesting case. This thesis examines how planners imagine sustainable mobility, who the sustainable traveler is, and what a sustainable city might look like. Theoretically the thesis combines an intersectional framework with a feminist planning theory and theories from Science and Technology Studies. The empirical material is based on in-depth interviews with sixteen planners, a focus group interview, and visual analyses of the planning documents the city of Helsingborg uses in planning for sustainable mobility. The analyses show that planners do not see the negative environmental impact of traveling as an argument which will persuade people to travel more sustainably. Instead, it is the possibility to construct sustainable mobility as fun, healthy, pleasurable, and practical that planners believe will persuade the inhabitants of Helsingborg to cycle or travel by bus more often. But not all travelers are likely to benefit from the positive values of sustainable mobility. To conclude, when planners imagine sustainable mobility, they imagine that it is good to travel the correct way for environmental reasons, but it is even greater to make independent travel choices, based on what modes of transport attract the most people. <p>I denna elektroniska version av avhandlingen är bilderna i bilaga 2 uteslutna på grund av upphovsrättsliga skäl.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:15, 21 January 2021
(No difference)