https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Haynes%2A_et_al_2024a Haynes* et al 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-07T18:30:07Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Haynes*_et_al_2024a&diff=302904&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 443617516 to Haynes* et al 2024a 2024-06-10T10:51:40Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_443617516" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 443617516">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 443617516</a> to <a href="/public/Haynes*_et_al_2024a" title="Haynes* et al 2024a">Haynes* et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:51, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Haynes*_et_al_2024a&diff=302903&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:51, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T10:51:32Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:51, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Cone penetration testing with pore pressure measurement (CPTu) represents a state of practice tool to assess the in situ state parameter, strength, and liquefaction susceptibility of sandy soils and mine tailings. Many techniques for the interpretation of CPTu data are based on the results of calibration chamber test programs on sand and, more recently, mine tailings. While these efforts have led to the current methods to interpret CPTu data, two factors relevant to CPTu interpretation require consideration: (i) the available calibration chamber data is dominated by tests with consolidated mean effective stresses &amp;lt; 200 kPa; and (ii) tailings storage facilities are being constructed to heights such that in situ effective stresses are far higher than those of the available calibration chamber test database. While much of CPTu interpretation is carried out in a dimensionless framework, there is evidence that existing relationships between stressnormalised tip resistance and state parameter are dependent on effective stress. This stress-dependence has been attributed to a variation in shear rigidity with effective stress, which is not accounted for in many interpretation techniques. However, at high stresses, other factors such as the curvature of the critical state line in an e-log(p’) plane may contribute. To assess CPTu of sands at high stresses, a novel small-scale calibration chamber employing a miniature cone capable of testing soils consolidated to a mean effective stress up to 2,000 kPa is outlined. Test results are presented for tests carried out over a range of mean effective stresses up to 1,000 kPa.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Cone penetration testing with pore pressure measurement (CPTu) represents a state of practice tool to assess the in situ state parameter, strength, and liquefaction susceptibility of sandy soils and mine tailings. Many techniques for the interpretation of CPTu data are based on the results of calibration chamber test programs on sand and, more recently, mine tailings. While these efforts have led to the current methods to interpret CPTu data, two factors relevant to CPTu interpretation require consideration: (i) the available calibration chamber data is dominated by tests with consolidated mean effective stresses &amp;lt; 200 kPa; and (ii) tailings storage facilities are being constructed to heights such that in situ effective stresses are far higher than those of the available calibration chamber test database. While much of CPTu interpretation is carried out in a dimensionless framework, there is evidence that existing relationships between stressnormalised tip resistance and state parameter are dependent on effective stress. This stress-dependence has been attributed to a variation in shear rigidity with effective stress, which is not accounted for in many interpretation techniques. However, at high stresses, other factors such as the curvature of the critical state line in an e-log(p’) plane may contribute. To assess CPTu of sands at high stresses, a novel small-scale calibration chamber employing a miniature cone capable of testing soils consolidated to a mean effective stress up to 2,000 kPa is outlined. Test results are presented for tests carried out over a range of mean effective stresses up to 1,000 kPa.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_443617516120.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302901:newid:302903 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Haynes*_et_al_2024a&diff=302901&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:51, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T10:51:30Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:51, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Cone penetration testing with pore pressure measurement (CPTu) represents a state of practice tool to assess the in situ state parameter, strength, and liquefaction susceptibility of sandy soils and mine tailings. Many techniques for the interpretation of CPTu data are based on the results of calibration chamber test programs on sand and, more recently, mine tailings. While these efforts have led to the current methods to interpret CPTu data, two factors relevant to CPTu interpretation require consideration: (i) the available calibration chamber data is dominated by tests with consolidated mean effective stresses &amp;lt; 200 kPa; and (ii) tailings storage facilities are being constructed to heights such that in situ effective stresses are far higher than those of the available calibration chamber test database. While much of CPTu interpretation is carried out in a dimensionless framework, there is evidence that existing relationships between stressnormalised tip resistance and state parameter are dependent on effective stress. This stress-dependence has been attributed to a variation in shear rigidity with effective stress, which is not accounted for in many interpretation techniques. However, at high stresses, other factors such as the curvature of the critical state line in an e-log(p’) plane may contribute. To assess CPTu of sands at high stresses, a novel small-scale calibration chamber employing a miniature cone capable of testing soils consolidated to a mean effective stress up to 2,000 kPa is outlined. Test results are presented for tests carried out over a range of mean effective stresses up to 1,000 kPa.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302900:newid:302901 --> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Haynes*_et_al_2024a&diff=302900&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-10T10:51:28Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez