Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 491347702 to Halpern et al 2020b

2021-01-25T17:42:13Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 491347702 to Halpern et al 2020b

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The findings reported in this deliverable reflect the state of knowledge up to their first submission date. A revised version will be submitted in August 2021..."

2021-01-25T17:42:10Z

Created page with " == Abstract == The findings reported in this deliverable reflect the state of knowledge up to their first submission date. A revised version will be submitted in August 2021..."

New page

== Abstract ==

The findings reported in this deliverable reflect the state of knowledge up to their first submission date. A revised version will be submitted in August 2021 that will include more recent material.; This report is the third WP2 deliverable. Drawing on the work done on the organizational, institutional, regulatory and political dimensions of road space allocation, it focuses on the contestation of street space. By purposefully using the notion of contestation, it sets out to identify various views on how space should be allocated across different transport modes and non-transport activities, as well as the various ways through which they are made material. Who has an interest in contesting road space arrangements or proposed changes? What are these claims about? How are they mobilized? To what extent are these claims channelled by formal consultation and decision-making processes? What similarities can be found across cities? How are these views represented at EU level? Drawing on an original qualitative dataset, the report includes an up-to-date analysis of how the contestation of street space enfolds across five cities - London, Constanta, Malmö, Lisbon and Budapest - and at EU level. Content: An up-to-date analysis of how the contestation of street space enfolds across five cities - London, Constanta, Malmö, Lisbon and Budapest - and at EU level ; Appendices : the detailed, supporting analysis for each of the five cases (“city portraits”), two sets of recommendations produced by ECF (European Cyclists Foundation) of how existing EU and Member states legislation should be revised in order to accommodate cycling.

== Original document ==

The different versions of the original document can be found in:

* [https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02990733 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02990733]

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:42, 25 January 2021
(No difference)

Halpern et al 2020b - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 491347702 to Halpern et al 2020b

Scipediacontent: Created page with " == Abstract == The findings reported in this deliverable reflect the state of knowledge up to their first submission date. A revised version will be submitted in August 2021..."