https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Halleux_et_al_2024a 2026-05-06T09:35:54Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Halleux_et_al_2024a&diff=302542&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:21:38Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_110263904" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 110263904">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 110263904</a> to <a href="/public/Halleux_et_al_2024a" title="Halleux et al 2024a">Halleux et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:21, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Halleux_et_al_2024a&diff=302541&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:21:32Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:21, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Accurate evaluation of undrained shear strength of soils is crucial in geotechnical design and assessment. In the practice, undrained shear strength is obtained most frequently from CPT data, dividing the net cone tip resistance by a cone factor, 𝑁 . For organic soils, values between 8.6 and 15.3 are reported, depending on the stress history. The cone factor can be conditioned to the results of laboratory tests, although uncertainties remain on the variety of stress paths followed by the soil elements around the tip of the cone, compared to the ones tested in the laboratory. Non-uniqueness in the definition of the cone factor may lead to either unsafe or over-conservative choices, partly undermining both the reliability and the sustainability of the design. This contribution analyses numerically the inversion technique used to determine the undrained shear strength of organic clays, exploiting data from an extensive in situ and laboratory investigation. The adopted constitutive model was calibrated on the results of laboratory tests. Cone penetration tests were simulated performing coupled hydro-mechanical numerical analyses via G-PFEM, developed in the last decade at CIMNE-UPC. The role played by initial stress state and previous stress history upon stress distribution at failure, cone factor and sleeve friction is discussed. The numerical results suggest how the sleeve friction could be used to condition the cone factor depending on the over-consolidation ratio and demonstrate how combining the different available CPT readings with the aid of numerical results may reduce the uncertainty in the estimation of undrained shear strength.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Accurate evaluation of undrained shear strength of soils is crucial in geotechnical design and assessment. In the practice, undrained shear strength is obtained most frequently from CPT data, dividing the net cone tip resistance by a cone factor, 𝑁 . For organic soils, values between 8.6 and 15.3 are reported, depending on the stress history. The cone factor can be conditioned to the results of laboratory tests, although uncertainties remain on the variety of stress paths followed by the soil elements around the tip of the cone, compared to the ones tested in the laboratory. Non-uniqueness in the definition of the cone factor may lead to either unsafe or over-conservative choices, partly undermining both the reliability and the sustainability of the design. This contribution analyses numerically the inversion technique used to determine the undrained shear strength of organic clays, exploiting data from an extensive in situ and laboratory investigation. The adopted constitutive model was calibrated on the results of laboratory tests. Cone penetration tests were simulated performing coupled hydro-mechanical numerical analyses via G-PFEM, developed in the last decade at CIMNE-UPC. The role played by initial stress state and previous stress history upon stress distribution at failure, cone factor and sleeve friction is discussed. The numerical results suggest how the sleeve friction could be used to condition the cone factor depending on the over-consolidation ratio and demonstrate how combining the different available CPT readings with the aid of numerical results may reduce the uncertainty in the estimation of undrained shear strength.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_110263904147.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Halleux_et_al_2024a&diff=302539&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:21:30Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 09:21, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Accurate evaluation of undrained shear strength of soils is crucial in geotechnical design and assessment. In the practice, undrained shear strength is obtained most frequently from CPT data, dividing the net cone tip resistance by a cone factor, 𝑁 . For organic soils, values between 8.6 and 15.3 are reported, depending on the stress history. The cone factor can be conditioned to the results of laboratory tests, although uncertainties remain on the variety of stress paths followed by the soil elements around the tip of the cone, compared to the ones tested in the laboratory. Non-uniqueness in the definition of the cone factor may lead to either unsafe or over-conservative choices, partly undermining both the reliability and the sustainability of the design. This contribution analyses numerically the inversion technique used to determine the undrained shear strength of organic clays, exploiting data from an extensive in situ and laboratory investigation. The adopted constitutive model was calibrated on the results of laboratory tests. Cone penetration tests were simulated performing coupled hydro-mechanical numerical analyses via G-PFEM, developed in the last decade at CIMNE-UPC. The role played by initial stress state and previous stress history upon stress distribution at failure, cone factor and sleeve friction is discussed. The numerical results suggest how the sleeve friction could be used to condition the cone factor depending on the over-consolidation ratio and demonstrate how combining the different available CPT readings with the aid of numerical results may reduce the uncertainty in the estimation of undrained shear strength.</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff cache key mw_drafts_scipedia-sc_mwd_:diff:version:1.11a:oldid:302538:newid:302539 --> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Halleux_et_al_2024a&diff=302538&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T09:21:28Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez