https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a Ghafghazi et al 2024a - Revision history 2026-05-07T08:19:54Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a&diff=302942&oldid=prev JSanchez: JSanchez moved page Draft Sanchez Pinedo 347691267 to Ghafghazi et al 2024a 2024-06-10T10:54:39Z <p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_347691267" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 347691267">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 347691267</a> to <a href="/public/Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a" title="Ghafghazi et al 2024a">Ghafghazi et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:54, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a&diff=302941&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:54, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T10:54:31Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:54, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is the primary site investigation tool in silt-rich tailings. The permeability and compressibility range of tailings often puts the standard CPT penetration rate in the partial drainage range where the tip resistance, pore water pressure, and sleeve friction become functions of not only the state, but also drainage conditions. This makes interpretation of the state parameter, which represents liquefaction susceptibility and residual strength of tailings particularly challenging. It is not clear whether existing CPT interpretation frameworks are capable of accounting for effects of partial drainage. Developing field correlations for interpreting partially drained CPT data in tailings is hampered by spatial variability and sampling disturbance. CPT tests were performed in a calibration chamber and in the field on a gold tailings material. Dissipation tests were performed, and the pore water pressures on the cone at the u2 position were monitored. The degree of partial drainage was estimated based on the coefficient of consolidation inferred from these dissipation tests. Similarities and differences of the calibration chamber and field CPTs were discussed.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is the primary site investigation tool in silt-rich tailings. The permeability and compressibility range of tailings often puts the standard CPT penetration rate in the partial drainage range where the tip resistance, pore water pressure, and sleeve friction become functions of not only the state, but also drainage conditions. This makes interpretation of the state parameter, which represents liquefaction susceptibility and residual strength of tailings particularly challenging. It is not clear whether existing CPT interpretation frameworks are capable of accounting for effects of partial drainage. Developing field correlations for interpreting partially drained CPT data in tailings is hampered by spatial variability and sampling disturbance. CPT tests were performed in a calibration chamber and in the field on a gold tailings material. Dissipation tests were performed, and the pore water pressures on the cone at the u2 position were monitored. The degree of partial drainage was estimated based on the coefficient of consolidation inferred from these dissipation tests. Similarities and differences of the calibration chamber and field CPTs were discussed.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_347691267175.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a&diff=302939&oldid=prev JSanchez at 10:54, 10 June 2024 2024-06-10T10:54:29Z <p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:54, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is the primary site investigation tool in silt-rich tailings. The permeability and compressibility range of tailings often puts the standard CPT penetration rate in the partial drainage range where the tip resistance, pore water pressure, and sleeve friction become functions of not only the state, but also drainage conditions. This makes interpretation of the state parameter, which represents liquefaction susceptibility and residual strength of tailings particularly challenging. It is not clear whether existing CPT interpretation frameworks are capable of accounting for effects of partial drainage. Developing field correlations for interpreting partially drained CPT data in tailings is hampered by spatial variability and sampling disturbance. CPT tests were performed in a calibration chamber and in the field on a gold tailings material. Dissipation tests were performed, and the pore water pressures on the cone at the u2 position were monitored. The degree of partial drainage was estimated based on the coefficient of consolidation inferred from these dissipation tests. Similarities and differences of the calibration chamber and field CPTs were discussed.</ins></div></td></tr> </table> JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Ghafghazi_et_al_2024a&diff=302938&oldid=prev JSanchez: Created blank page 2024-06-10T10:54:27Z <p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div> JSanchez