Scipediacontent at 10:53, 29 May 2017

2017-05-29T10:53:20Z

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 328761303 to Frings et al 2016b

2017-05-26T09:11:52Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 328761303 to Frings et al 2016b

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Highlights== * Implicit drinker identity is linked with self-reported past usage and intentions. * Study compares implicit/explicit identity effects on attitudes and actual..."

2017-05-26T09:05:58Z

Created page with "== Highlights== * Implicit drinker identity is linked with self-reported past usage and intentions. * Study compares implicit/explicit identity effects on attitudes and actual..."

Show changes

@@ Line 184: / Line 184: @@
 ! ''R''<sup>2</sup>
-! <math display="inline">\overset{\rule{1em}{1pt}}{R}</math><sup>2</sup>
+! <math display="inline">\overset{-}{R}</math><sup>2</sup>
 ! ''F''
 ! ''p''
@@ Line 262: / Line 262: @@
 |}
-Note: Models are reported by row, with the dependent (criterion) variable in the first column, followed by model fit statistics, the effects of each identity as a predictor variable, and the resulting interaction term. Model fit statistics reflect the full model with both predictors and interaction term. For all models, N = 32 and degrees of freedom were (3,28). <math display="inline">\overset{\rule{1em}{1pt}}{R}</math><sup>2</sup> indicates adjusted ''R''<sup>2</sup>. β indicates standardised betas.
+Note: Models are reported by row, with the dependent (criterion) variable in the first column, followed by model fit statistics, the effects of each identity as a predictor variable, and the resulting interaction term. Model fit statistics reflect the full model with both predictors and interaction term. For all models, N = 32 and degrees of freedom were (3,28). <math display="inline">\overset{-}{R}</math><sup>2</sup> indicates adjusted ''R''<sup>2</sup>. β indicates standardised betas.
 In summary, participants' attitude towards their own drinking was related to their explicit identity as a drinker (with greater identification being related to more positive attitudes), but not their implicit identity as a drinker. The amount participants poured was unrelated to the either identity. There was a marginal (''p'' = .079) association between implicit identities and total consumed. There was no relationship (''p'' = .31) between this outcome and explicit identity. The proportion of the amount poured consumed was predicted by a significant interaction between the two identities. To explore this interaction via simple slopes analysis, both identity variables were standardised, a new interaction term calculated and simple slopes analysis was undertaken, testing at values +/− one standard deviation from the mean (see [[#f0005|Fig. 1]]). When levels of explicit identity were high, there was no effect of implicit identity, β = −.06, ''t''(32) = .73, ''p'' = .47. When levels of explicit identity were low, higher implicit identity was linked to a greater proportion consumed, β = .22, ''t''(32) = 3.03, ''p'' < .001. When levels of implicit identity were low, there was no effect of explicit identity, β = .07, ''t''(32) = 1.09, ''p'' = .29. When levels of implicit identity were high, lower levels of explicit identity were linked with a greater proportion consumed, β = .21, ''t''(32) = 2.81, ''p'' = .009.

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:11, 26 May 2017
(No difference)

Frings et al 2016b - Revision history

Scipediacontent at 10:53, 29 May 2017

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 328761303 to Frings et al 2016b

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Highlights== * Implicit drinker identity is linked with self-reported past usage and intentions. * Study compares implicit/explicit identity effects on attitudes and actual..."