Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 200145046 to Ferretti et al 2021a

2021-11-30T13:16:58Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 200145046 to Ferretti et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == Existing masonry buildings, representing a large portion of the building stock in the Mediterranean area, are usually characterized by the presence of..."

2021-11-30T13:16:55Z

Created page with "== Abstract == Existing masonry buildings, representing a large portion of the building stock in the Mediterranean area, are usually characterized by the presence of..."

New page

== Abstract ==

Existing masonry buildings, representing a large portion of the building stock in the
Mediterranean area, are usually characterized by the presence of different constituent
materials. The modifications experienced over time could have modified the static
configuration of the structures and could trigger local damages and crises. Therefore,
it is of fundamental importance to assess the safety of these constructions and to
determine if retrofitting interventions are needed. In this framework, one of the crucial
aspects is the mechanical characterization of masonry. Concerning brick masonries, several
testing methodologies exist for the determination of the compressive strength, the elastic
modulus and the Poisson’s ratio. In particular, slightly-destructive tests, such as double
flatjack tests and compressive tests on masonry cores, can be performed in place of
destructive tests due to their limited invasiveness. However, they could be less
representative of the overall behavior of masonry structural elements. The objective of the
research is to evaluate the reliability of slightly-destructive tests in evaluating the compressive
properties of masonry. An experimental campaign is presented, in which masonry specimens
were built to reproduce a poor-quality brick masonry typology. Standard compression tests
on wallets and double flatjack tests, both monotonic and cyclic, were performed.
Moreover, masonry cores were extracted from the masonry specimens and tested in
compression. Compressive strength, elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio were evaluated
from each testing methodology. The results obtained from the double flatjack tests and the
tests on cores, in terms of strength and deformability properties, were compared with the
results of the standard compression tests, taken as reference. Correlations between the
results of the slightly-destructive tests and the standard compression tests were established,
obtaining a good agreement and confirming that the experimental techniques can be
reliably adopted for the evaluation of the compressive properties of brick masonry.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_200145046p1170.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] Ferretti, F., Ferracuti, B., Mazzotti, C. and Savoia M. Destructive and minor destructive tests on masonry buildings: Experimental results and comparison between shear failure criteria. Constr. Build. Mater. (2019) 199:12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.246.

[2] Binda, L., Saisi, A. and Tiraboschi, C. Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries, Constr. Build. Mater. (2000) 14:199–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00018-0.

[3] ASTM C1197-14. Standard Test Method for In Situ Measurement of Masonry Deformability Properties Using the Flatjack Method. American Society of Testing Material (2014).

[4] Binda, L. and Tiraboschi, C. Flatjack test as a slightly destructive technique for the diagnosis of brick and stone masonry structures. Int. Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments (1999):449-472.

[5] Sassoni, E., Mazzotti, C. and Pagliai, G. Comparison between experimental methods for evaluating the compressive strength of existing masonry buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. (2014) 68:206–219.

[6] Sassoni, E. and Mazzotti, C. The use of small diameter cores for assessing the compressive strength of clay brick masonries. J. Cult. Herit. (2013) 14S:e95-e101.6.

[7] Pelà, L., Canella, E., Aprile, A. and Roca, P. Compression test of masonry core samples extracted from existing brickwork. Constr. Build. Mater. (2016) 119:230–240.

[8] Jafari, S., Rots, J.G. and Esposito, R. Core testing method to assess nonlinear behavior of brick masonry under compression: A comparative experimental study. Constr. Build. Mater. (2019) 218:193–205.

[9] Incerti, A., Rinaldini, V. and Mazzotti, C. The evaluation of masonry shear strength by means of different experimental techniques: a comparison between full-scale and laboratory tests. International Brick & Block Masonry Conference (IBMAC), CRC Press (2016), pp. 1645–1652.

[10] EN 772-1. Methods of test for masonry units - Part 1: Determination of compressive strength, European Committee for Standardization (2011).

[11] EN 12390-5:2009. Testing hardened concrete - Part 5: Flexural strength of test specimens, European Committee for Standardization (2009).

[12] EN 12390-13. Testing hardened concrete - Determination of secant modulus of elasticity in compression, European Committee for Standardization (2013).

[13] EN 1015-11:1999/A1:2006. Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar, European Committee for Standardization (2006).

[14] EN 1052-1:1998. Methods of test for masonry - Part 1: Determination of compressive strength, European Committee for Standardization (1998).

[15] Henzel, J. and Karl, S. Determination of strength of mortar in the joints of masonry by compression tests on small specimens. Darmstadt Concrete (1987) 2:123-136.

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:16, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

Ferretti et al 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 200145046 to Ferretti et al 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == Existing masonry buildings, representing a large portion of the building stock in the Mediterranean area, are usually characterized by the presence of..."