https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Fechner%2A_et_al_2024a 2026-05-08T18:46:21Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.0-wmf.10 https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Fechner*_et_al_2024a&diff=302856&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:39:56Z

<p>JSanchez moved page <a href="/public/Draft_Sanchez_Pinedo_226178758" class="mw-redirect" title="Draft Sanchez Pinedo 226178758">Draft Sanchez Pinedo 226178758</a> to <a href="/public/Fechner*_et_al_2024a" title="Fechner* et al 2024a">Fechner* et al 2024a</a></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan='2' style='text-align: center;' lang='en'><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Fechner*_et_al_2024a&diff=302855&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:39:51Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Seismic surveys are often carried out between two or more pre-installed boreholes to assess unknown geological situation in the subsurface with high resolution. However, the cost of installing boreholes is often a budgetary constraint. Therefore, the direct-push technology, where rods are pushed into the subsurface, seems to be a more suitable tool and by incorporating seismic sources and receivers into the push rods, geophysical methods can become more flexible and adaptable, especially for larger areas of investigation or sites in harsh environments. In this paper, we present field results using such a direct-push seismic system as a cost-effective alternative to standard borehole-based investigation techniques. For both techniques complete cross-hole datasets of P, SV and SH waves were acquired at two different test sites (1) between direct-push boreholes and (2) between PVC cased boreholes. The in-situ profiles of the paired shear wave velocity profiles (SH and SV) were used to evaluate the stress history of the soils by deriving the over-consolidation difference (OCD). Many geotechnical parameters are influenced by the soil stress history, such as deformation properties and soil stiffness, but in the calculation of geotechnical parameters, such as the lateral stress state (K0), consolidation coefficient and liquefaction response the OCR also plays an important role. The tests also showed that direct-push based techniques make even seismic methods more flexible as test positions can be easily adapted and changed according to the results, local conditions or client requirements.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Seismic surveys are often carried out between two or more pre-installed boreholes to assess unknown geological situation in the subsurface with high resolution. However, the cost of installing boreholes is often a budgetary constraint. Therefore, the direct-push technology, where rods are pushed into the subsurface, seems to be a more suitable tool and by incorporating seismic sources and receivers into the push rods, geophysical methods can become more flexible and adaptable, especially for larger areas of investigation or sites in harsh environments. In this paper, we present field results using such a direct-push seismic system as a cost-effective alternative to standard borehole-based investigation techniques. For both techniques complete cross-hole datasets of P, SV and SH waves were acquired at two different test sites (1) between direct-push boreholes and (2) between PVC cased boreholes. The in-situ profiles of the paired shear wave velocity profiles (SH and SV) were used to evaluate the stress history of the soils by deriving the over-consolidation difference (OCD). Many geotechnical parameters are influenced by the soil stress history, such as deformation properties and soil stiffness, but in the calculation of geotechnical parameters, such as the lateral stress state (K0), consolidation coefficient and liquefaction response the OCR also plays an important role. The tests also showed that direct-push based techniques make even seismic methods more flexible as test positions can be easily adapted and changed according to the results, local conditions or client requirements.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Full Paper ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;pdf&gt;Media:Draft_Sanchez Pinedo_226178758155.pdf&lt;/pdf&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Fechner*_et_al_2024a&diff=302853&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:39:50Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2024</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">==Abstract==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Seismic surveys are often carried out between two or more pre-installed boreholes to assess unknown geological situation in the subsurface with high resolution. However, the cost of installing boreholes is often a budgetary constraint. Therefore, the direct-push technology, where rods are pushed into the subsurface, seems to be a more suitable tool and by incorporating seismic sources and receivers into the push rods, geophysical methods can become more flexible and adaptable, especially for larger areas of investigation or sites in harsh environments. In this paper, we present field results using such a direct-push seismic system as a cost-effective alternative to standard borehole-based investigation techniques. For both techniques complete cross-hole datasets of P, SV and SH waves were acquired at two different test sites (1) between direct-push boreholes and (2) between PVC cased boreholes. The in-situ profiles of the paired shear wave velocity profiles (SH and SV) were used to evaluate the stress history of the soils by deriving the over-consolidation difference (OCD). Many geotechnical parameters are influenced by the soil stress history, such as deformation properties and soil stiffness, but in the calculation of geotechnical parameters, such as the lateral stress state (K0), consolidation coefficient and liquefaction response the OCR also plays an important role. The tests also showed that direct-push based techniques make even seismic methods more flexible as test positions can be easily adapted and changed according to the results, local conditions or client requirements.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

JSanchez https://www.scipedia.com/wd/index.php?title=Fechner*_et_al_2024a&diff=302852&oldid=prev 2024-06-10T10:39:48Z

<p>Created blank page</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div></div>

JSanchez