Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 723812477 to E. Mousavian 2021a

2021-11-30T11:52:47Z

Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 723812477 to E. Mousavian 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a method to analyses the structural feasibility and assemblability of the masonry assemblages composed of interlocking blocks. In..."

2021-11-30T11:52:44Z

Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a method to analyses the structural feasibility and assemblability of the masonry assemblages composed of interlocking blocks. In..."

New page

== Abstract ==

This paper presents a method to analyses the structural feasibility and
assemblability of the masonry assemblages composed of interlocking blocks. Interlocking
blocks with projections and depressions on their faces have relatively better structural
performance comparing to the conventional blocks with flat faces, during and after the
construction. Therefore, they can represent proper alternatives to the conventional blocks for
the seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry structures. Structural soundness and
assemblability of a model are both functions of the interlocking block geometry. The proposed
methods enable the designer to adjust the shape of the interlocking blocks, while meeting the
structural and assembling requirements. The paper first introduces an extension of the limit
analysis to the assemblages with corrugated interlocking interfaces having anisotropic sliding
behavior. Then, the work reformulates the extended limit analysis to develop a method to
measure the structural infeasibility due to the lack of sliding resistance at the interlocking
interfaces. This is called sliding infeasibility and the designer can minimize it during the
shape exploration. Finally, an assemblability method is presented to check if the designed
interlocking blocks can be assembled on the other blocks in contact. This method is added to
the extended limit analysis and the sliding infeasibility measurement method in form of a
geometric constraint that prevents modeling of un-assemblable structures.

== Full document ==
<pdf>Media:Draft_Content_723812477p934.pdf</pdf>
== References ==

[1] Liu, H., Liu, P., Lin, K. and Zhao, S. Cyclic behavior of mortarless brick joints with different interlocking shapes. Materials (2016) 9(3): art. no. 166.

[2] Totoev, Y.Z. Design procedure for semi interlocking masonry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture (2015) 9: 517-525.

[3] Hossain, M. A., Totoev, Y.Z. and Masia, M.J. Friction on Mortar-less Joints in Semi Interlocking Masonry. In: C. Modena et al. (Eds.): Brick and Block Masonry–Trends, Innovations and Challenges, CRC Press/Balkema (2016), pp. 1635-1644.

[4] Dyskin, A.V., Pasternak, E. and Estrin, Y. Mortarless structures based on topological interlocking. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering (2012) 6(2):188-197.

[5] Dyskin, A. V., Estrin, Y. and Pasternak, E. Topological Interlocking Materials. In: Y. Estrin, et al. (Eds.). Architectured Materials in Nature and Engineering, Springer (2019), pp. 23-49.

[6] Ali, M., Gultom, R.J. and Chouw, N. Capacity of innovative interlocking blocks under monotonic loading. Construction and Building Materials (2012) 37:812-821.

[7] Giresini, L. Design Strategy for the Rocking Stability of Horizontally Restrained Masonry Walls. In: M. Papadrakakis and M. Fragiadakis (Eds.): Proceedings of the 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2017), National Technical University of Athens (2017), pp. 2963-2979.

[8] Giresini, L., Sassu, M. and Sorrentino, L. In situ free‐vibration tests on unrestrained and restrained rocking masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (2018) 47(15):3006-3025.

[9] Giresini, L., Lourenço, P.B., Puppio, M.L., Sassu, M. Rocking and Kinematic Analysis of Two Masonry Church Façades. In: K. Van Balen and E. Verstrynge (Eds.): Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (SAHC 2016), CRC Press/Balkema (2016), pp. 1190-1196.

[10] Fang, D., Moradei, J., Brütting, J., Fischer, A., Landez, D.K., Shao, B. and Mueller, C. Modern Timber Design Approaches for Traditional Japanese Architecture: Analytical, Experimental, and Numerical Approaches for the Nuki Joint. In: C. Lázaro et al. (Eds.): Form and Force (IASS 2019), CIMNE (2019), pp. 2911-2918.

[11] Sassu, M., De Falco, A., Giresini, L. and Puppio, M. Structural solutions for low-cost bamboo frames: Experimental tests and constructive assessments. Materials (2016) 9(5): art. no. 346.

[12] Cipollini, M., Bonannini, E.,Cinotti, M., Sassu, M. Design, production, and installation of wooden walls for the Japan Pavilion at Expo 2015. Buildings (2016) 6(4): art. no. 43.

[13] Mousavian, E. and Casapulla, C. Structurally informed design of interlocking block assemblages using limit analysis. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering (2020) 7(4):1-21.

[14] Rippmann M., Curry J., Escobedo D. and Block P. Optimising Stone-Cutting Strategies for Freeform Masonry Vaults. In: J.B. Obrębski and R. Tarczewski (Eds.): Proceedingsof the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium (2013), pp. 1-7.

[15] Sassu, M., Stochino, F., Mistretta, F. Assessment method for combined structural and energy retrofitting in masonry buildings. Buildings (2017) 7(3): art. no. 71.

[16] Heyman, J. The stone skeleton. International Journal of solids and structures (1966) 2(2):249-279.

[17] Livesley, R.K. Limit analysis of structures formed from rigid blocks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (1978) 12(12):1853-1871.

[18] Livesley, R.K. A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures. Meccanica (1992) 27(3):161-172.

[19] Casapulla, C. and Maione, A. Modelling the dry-contact interface of rigid blocks under torsion and combined loadings: concavity vs. convexity formulation. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics (2018) 99:86-96.

[20] Gilbert, M., Casapulla, C. and Ahmed, H.M. (2006). Limit analysis of masonry block structures with non-associative frictional joints using linear programming. Computers and Structures 84(13-14):873-887.

[21] Mousavian, E. and Casapulla, C. Limit State Approach for Structurally informed Design of Shells Composed of Interlocking Blocks. In: C. Lázaro et al. (Eds.): Form and Force (IASS 2019), CIMNE (2019), pp. 1610-1618.

[22] Canny, J. The complexity of robot motion planning. MIT press (1988).

[23] Wilson, R.H. On Geometric Assembly Planning, PhD thesis No. STAN-CS-92-1416 (1992) Stanford University, Department of Computer Science.

[24] Ghandi, S. and Masehian, E. Review and taxonomies of assembly and disassembly path planning problems and approaches. Computer-Aided Design (2015) 67:58-86.

[25] Casapulla, C. and Portioli F. Experimental tests on the limit states of dry-jointed tuff blocks. Materials and Structures (2016) 49(3):751-767.

[26] Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J. and Durand, F. Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2009) 28(5):112:1-112:9.

[27] Casapulla, C., Mousavian, E. and Zarghani, M. A digital tool to design structurally feasible semi-circular masonry arches composed of interlocking blocks. Computers and Structures (2019) 221:111-126.

[28] Tai, A.S.C. Design for assembly: a computational approach to construct interlocking wooden frames, PhD thesis (2012) Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:52, 30 November 2021
(No difference)

E. Mousavian 2021a - Revision history

Scipediacontent: Scipediacontent moved page Draft Content 723812477 to E. Mousavian 2021a

Scipediacontent: Created page with "== Abstract == This paper presents a method to analyses the structural feasibility and assemblability of the masonry assemblages composed of interlocking blocks. In..."